FirstHR

Billing and Time Tracking Software: 9 Compared

Billing and time tracking software compared on invoicing, real cost at 10, 25, and 50 users, and the pricing changes that hit two major tools.

Billing and Time Tracking Software Compared

Why the advertised seat price is no longer the price at two major vendors, what eight of them cost at 10, 25, and 50 users, and where client billing stops being a payroll record

I build software for small businesses, and if another founder asked me how to choose a billing and time tracking tool, I would tell them to compare the bills, not the pricing pages. This comparison does that for nine tools, and works out what eight of them cost at three team sizes.

For most of this category's history the buying question was simple: pick a per-seat price you can live with and check that the invoice template looks professional. Two pricing changes broke that, and both of them open a gap between the number on the pricing page and the number on the bill.

One major vendor was acquired and, in early 2026, restructured its pricing to charge usage fees on top of the seat rate, so a renewal can rise without a single seat being added. Another raised its per-employee fee by 25 percent at the entry tier by early July 2026.

Neither change is hidden, but neither shows up in a side-by-side comparison of advertised starting prices, which is how most of these tools get compared. This page covers what those changes mean if you are buying now, along with what the category does and where client billing stops being a valid payroll record.

TL;DR
Most team tools cost $4 to $11 per user a month, with Clockify cheapest at $3.99. Two list prices mislead: Harvest adds usage fees on top of its seat rate, and QuickBooks Time raised its per-employee fee $2 by early July 2026. Billable-hours tracking is not a wage and hour record, so firms with non-exempt hourly staff need both.

What the category actually covers

The defining capability is not the timer. It is that a tracked hour carries a billable rate and a client attached to it, so an invoice can be generated from the time record rather than reconstructed from it.

CapabilityWhat it meansWho needs it
Billable rate per personDifferent people bill at different ratesAny firm with mixed seniority on a project
Rate per project or clientThe same person bills differently by engagementFirms with negotiated client rates
Billable versus internalTime is captured but excluded from invoicesEveryone, for utilization reporting
Budget trackingHours measured against an agreed project totalFixed-fee and capped engagements
Invoice generationThe bill is produced from the time recordFirms invoicing monthly from hours
Profitability reportingRevenue against cost per projectFirms deciding which work to take again

The last row is where the cheap tools and the expensive ones diverge. Tracking hours and sending an invoice is close to a commodity, available free on the smallest plans. What the higher tiers charge for is knowing whether a given client is actually profitable once you count the unbillable time around their work, and for many small firms that is the only feature worth paying for.

Project time management: budgets, estimates, and resourcing

Project time management is the layer above the timer: hours attached to a project that carries an agreed budget, so the tool can tell you how much of that budget is gone before the client does. Capture is the input. The comparison against the budget is the point.

Three capabilities separate this from a stopwatch with a client field. Estimates set against tasks, so actuals can be measured against what you quoted. Budget alerts that fire at a threshold rather than at the overrun. And resource scheduling, which shows who is already committed to which work instead of only reporting what happened after the fact.

Among the nine below, three go furthest here: Everhour, which ties budgets and estimates to the task inside your project system; Paymo, which adds resource scheduling on its top Pro tier; and BigTime, which treats project financials as the product rather than a report. Harvest keeps profitability reporting at its higher tier.

Client billing is not a payroll record

Client billing records and payroll records are constantly treated as the same thing, including by buyers who assume that because they are tracking hours they have satisfied their obligations as an employer. They have not.

The legal duty is specific. According to the Department of Labor's recordkeeping fact sheet, the Fair Labor Standards Act requires an employer to record the hours worked each day and each workweek for every non-exempt employee, meaning anyone entitled to overtime pay. A client timesheet that leaves out unbillable time does not meet that duty.

QuestionClient billingPayroll and compliance
What the hours produceAn invoice sent to a clientA paycheck paid to an employee
Who reviews themA project manager, then the clientA manager, then payroll
What accuracy protectsRevenue and the client relationshipLegal compliance with wage and hour rules
Rounding conventionTenths or quarters of an hour by customExact time, or neutral rounding that still pays all time worked
Unbillable timeTracked but excluded from the invoiceStill paid, and still counts toward overtime
Recordkeeping dutyContractual, set by the clientStatutory under the Fair Labor Standards Act
Most products in this category answer the left column well and the right column partially or not at all. A firm with non-exempt hourly employees has both obligations, and a billable-hours tool does not satisfy the second one on its own.
One rounding rule cannot serve both purposes
Professional services conventionally bill in six-minute or fifteen-minute increments, and configuring that rule is routine. The mistake is applying the same rounding to employee pay. Rounding that is perfectly acceptable in a client invoice is constrained by wage and hour rules when it determines what a non-exempt employee is paid. The federal regulation on time-clock rounding, 29 CFR 785.48, accepts rounding to the nearest five minutes, tenth, or quarter of an hour only if, over time, employees are still paid for all the time they actually work. A rule that systematically rounds against the employee creates legal risk regardless of intent. If the same tool feeds both your invoices and your payroll, confirm the rounding is configured separately for each rather than once globally.

The practical consequence is that a firm with salaried exempt professionals can often run on billing tracking alone, while a firm with non-exempt hourly staff needs a record of actual hours worked that satisfies statutory recordkeeping.

When one timesheet has to pay staff and bill clients

Some firms need a single hour to do two jobs: pay the person who worked it and bill the client who bought it. Staffing and recruiting agencies call this pay and bill, and it is the requirement this category handles least consistently, because most of these products were built to produce an invoice and stop there.

The Payroll Link column in the comparison table below shows the honest split. QuickBooks Time pushes hours into QuickBooks payroll and the ledger without an export step, and Hubstaff includes payroll features rather than a CSV download. The other seven expect somebody to carry approved hours into a payroll system, which is tolerable monthly and tiresome weekly.

If your margin lives in the gap between a pay rate and a bill rate, as it does in staffing, none of these tools models that on its own. An invoice and payroll workflow assembled from a general time tracker keeps the two rates in separate places, so agencies at real volume end up on a dedicated staffing platform instead.

Still Using Spreadsheets for Onboarding?
Automate documents, training assignments, task management, and track onboarding progress in real time.
See How It Works

Two pricing changes worth knowing before you buy

The two changes are Harvest's shift to usage charges layered over its seat price and a higher per-employee fee at QuickBooks Time. Both change what you will actually pay, each in a different way.

Harvest moved to seat plus usage

Harvest, now owned by Bending Spoons, restructured its pricing model in early 2026. The current arrangement pairs a per-seat plan fee with usage-based charges calculated from account activity: invoices sent, plus active projects, clients, and tasks. Harvest bills each paid plan either as Flex, with those usage charges, or as Unlimited at a fixed price, and its free tier covers one seat and two projects.

The seat price is a floor, not a total
The consequence is worth modeling before you sign. An account with few seats but many projects or clients can cost far more than the seat count suggests, because usage does not move with headcount. Harvest's pricing page also does not list the per-unit usage rates. This does not make the product bad: Harvest has a mature feature set and wide integrations, and the fixed-price Unlimited option exists precisely for buyers who want predictability. It does mean its per-seat rate cannot be compared like for like with a competitor's, and that a quote at your actual project and client volume is the only meaningful figure.

QuickBooks Time raised its per-employee fee

By early July 2026, QuickBooks Time had raised its per-employee monthly fee by $2 on both the Premium and Elite plans, with the $20 and $40 base fees unchanged. At the entry tier that moves the per-employee charge from $8 to $10, a 25 percent increase, applied on top of a base fee and on top of the QuickBooks Online subscription the product requires.

For a 25-person business the increase alone is roughly $600 a year. The product remains a reasonable choice for a firm whose books already live in QuickBooks, since the integration removes an export step, but at the new rate the value calculation has changed.

9 billing and time tracking products compared

The nine tools below span free plans to enterprise platforms. They were chosen because they cover the realistic range for small and growing firms, not because they are the most advertised.

ProductBest ForEntry PricePricing ModelBillable RatesInvoicingPayroll LinkTrial
ClockifyBudget-conscious teams$3.99/userPer userFree tier
TogglFast tracking, light billing$9/userPer userFree tier
HarvestTeams wanting mature invoicing$9/userSeat plus usageFree tier
PaymoSmall project-based teams$10.90/userPer userFree tier
EverhourTeams living in Asana or Jira$8.50/userPer userFree tier
HubstaffDistributed teams needing proof$4.99/userPer userFree tier
QuickBooks TimeBusinesses inside QuickBooks$20 + $10/eeBase plus per eeFree trial
BigTimeProfessional services at scale$20/userPer userDemo
FreshBooksSolo operators who invoice$20.70/moFlat plus usersFree trial
Pricing verified as of October 2026 from vendor pricing pages, at the lowest paid tier with annual billing where the vendor discounts for it. Paymo's Solo plan, at $5.90 a month, covers one user, so its team entry is Plus. Invoicing means the product generates a client invoice from tracked hours rather than exporting to an accounting tool. Payroll Link means hours feed a payroll process rather than only a client bill. Harvest carries usage fees on top of the seat rate on its usage-based billing option, so its entry figure is a floor rather than a total. QuickBooks Time requires a QuickBooks Online subscription billed separately.

Clockify

Clockify is the cheapest established paid option in the category. Basic, at $3.99 per user per month on annual billing, adds billable rates; Standard at $5.49 adds invoicing and approvals; and Pro at $7.99 adds scheduling, expenses, and profitability reports. By April 21, 2026, Clockify's own pricing page showed the free plan capped at five users, with billable rates moved to paid tiers.

For a firm of five or fewer that only needs hours captured against projects and builds invoices elsewhere, the free plan can still be a permanent answer. A team that bills from rates inside the tool starts at Basic.

Pros
Free plan for up to five users, enough to test real projects
Billable rates from the $3.99 Basic tier on annual billing
Cheapest paid tiers among established team tools
Broad platform coverage across web, desktop, and mobile
Cons
Invoicing is thinner than dedicated billing tools
Administrative depth means a busier interface than the minimalists
Invoicing and approvals start on the $5.49 Standard tier
Support is lighter than the premium-priced competitors

Toggl

Toggl, formerly Toggl Track, is built around speed of capture, with an interface widely regarded as the cleanest in the category. It has a free plan for up to three users, and paid plans start at $9 per user per month on annual billing.

If people at your firm skip tracking because tracking is annoying, Toggl addresses that cause more directly than a feature-richer tool would. The trade-off is the other half of the job: invoicing is comparatively limited (a PDF built from a report rather than a billing workflow), so firms that need billing depth typically pair it with something else or choose differently.

Pros
Fastest and least intrusive time capture experience
Strong reporting clarity for utilization and project analysis
Free plan for teams of up to three users
High adoption rates because the daily workflow is genuinely quick
Cons
Invoicing is limited relative to dedicated billing tools
Per-user pricing is above the budget options
Fewer administrative controls than Clockify
Advanced features require the higher tiers

Harvest

Harvest is a mature product with two decades of history, a well-regarded invoicing workflow, and wide integrations. It costs $9 per seat per month on Teams and $14 on Enterprise with annual billing. If the requirement is tracked hours becoming a clean client invoice with minimum friction, the workflow is among the best in the category.

The caveat is the pricing structure described above rather than the product. Model your actual project, client, and invoice volume before committing, and ask specifically about the fixed-price Unlimited billing option if predictability matters more than optimizing the monthly rate.

Pros
Among the smoothest paths from tracked time to a sent invoice
Mature feature set with wide third-party integrations
Fixed-fee billing option available for predictable costs
Long track record and stable core product
Cons
Usage fees on top of seat cost make the entry price a floor
Free tier limited to one seat and two projects
Project profitability reporting sits at the higher tier
Renewals can rise with project and client volume, not only seats

Paymo

Paymo is a project-based work platform with time tracking and invoicing built in. The Solo plan costs $5.90 a month for a single user. Teams start on Plus at $10.90 per user per month on annual billing, which includes project profitability, and Pro at $16.90 adds resource scheduling and timesheet approvals.

For a small agency or studio that wants project management and billing in the same tool rather than two subscriptions, Paymo hits a useful middle point.

Pros
Project management and billing in a single subscription
Low single-user price on the Solo plan
Free tier available for a single user
Resource scheduling included on the Pro tier
Cons
Breadth means more setup than a focused timer
Project profitability requires the Plus tier or above
Smaller ecosystem than the category leaders
Less suited to firms that already run a project tool

Everhour

Everhour is designed to embed inside project management tools rather than replace them, with native integrations into Asana, Jira, Trello, ClickUp, and others. Its free plan covers up to five users but leaves the integrations out, and the Team plan costs $8.50 per user per month on annual billing with a five-seat minimum.

For a team whose work already lives in one of those project tools, tracking from inside the task is far more likely to stick than asking people to open a second app.

Pros
Best-in-class integrations with project management platforms
Time tracked from inside the task raises adoption
Budgets and estimates tied to the work itself
Free plan for up to five users
Cons
Much of the value depends on using a supported project tool
Standalone experience is weaker than dedicated trackers
Invoicing is lighter than billing-first products
Per-user pricing above the budget tier

Hubstaff

Hubstaff is aimed at distributed teams where the client or the employer wants verification alongside the hours, with screenshots, activity levels, and GPS available depending on tier. Pricing starts around $4.99 per user per month with a two-seat minimum. For agencies billing clients who expect proof of work, this is the category answer, and for teams who would find monitoring intrusive it is the wrong one.

Pros
Verification features that some client contracts effectively require
Low entry price relative to the monitoring capability
Payroll features included rather than export-only
Strong fit for remote and field-based teams
Cons
Monitoring is a cultural decision, not just a feature choice
Two-seat minimum on paid plans
Feature set spread across tiers and paid add-ons
Overbuilt for a co-located professional team

QuickBooks Time

QuickBooks Time, formerly TSheets, is Intuit's time product, priced at a base fee plus a per-employee charge, and it requires a QuickBooks Online subscription. The argument for it is integration: hours reach payroll and the general ledger without an export, which for a firm already committed to QuickBooks removes a genuine friction point.

The argument against is cost. A $20 base fee plus $10 per employee, the rates in place by early July 2026, puts a 25-person team at $270 a month before the QuickBooks Online subscription.

Pros
Native integration with QuickBooks payroll and accounting
Strong scheduling and time clock functionality
Established product with deep employer-side features
Removes export steps for firms already on QuickBooks
Cons
Per-employee fee rose $2 per month by early July 2026
Requires a QuickBooks Online subscription billed separately
Base fee plus per-employee charge adds up quickly as a team grows
Little value if your books are not in QuickBooks

BigTime

BigTime is a professional services automation platform rather than a time tracker: it covers time, billing, expenses, and project portfolio management, and sells resource management as an add-on module. Pricing starts at $20 per user per month on the Essentials plan. For a consultancy or firm where project profitability and resourcing have become real management problems, the platform and its add-ons buy capability the cheaper tools genuinely lack.

Pros
Project financials beyond simple time and billing, with resourcing as an add-on
Built for professional services rather than adapted to it
Handles complex rate structures and billing arrangements
Scales into larger firms without replatforming
Cons
Entry price is several times the focused trackers
Substantially more platform than a small firm needs
Implementation effort is real rather than a signup
Adoption suffers if only the timer module is used

FreshBooks

FreshBooks is an invoicing and accounting product with time tracking attached, rather than the reverse. The Lite plan lists at $23 a month, or $248.40 a year on yearly billing, which works out to $20.70 a month. It lets you invoice up to five clients and charges $11 a month for each additional team member.

For a solo consultant whose actual need is to invoice clients, and who tracks hours as an input to that, FreshBooks covers both jobs in one subscription where the team-first tools cover only one.

Pros
Invoicing and light accounting in the same product as tracking
Flat monthly pricing rather than per user at the entry tier
Strong fit for solo operators and very small firms
Handles expenses and payment collection alongside billing
Cons
Each additional team member costs $11 a month
Time tracking is secondary to the accounting product
Weaker project and utilization reporting than the trackers
Cost rises quickly once a team grows past a couple of people
Companies Using FirstHR Onboard 3x Faster
Join hundreds of small businesses who transformed their new hire experience.
See It in Action

Time management software for accountants

Accounting firms shop this category for a reason the other buyers do not share: the work arrives in a wave. Utilization, the share of available hours that end up billable, is not a smooth line in a certified public accountant (CPA) practice. The useful report is not how many hours were billable overall but whose capacity busy season consumed, and how much of it was written off.

Three things to check before buying for a practice. Hours have to attach to an engagement rather than a generic project, because one client can run a return, a review, and advisory work at three different rates. Write-offs have to be visible, since the gap between hours worked and hours billed is what a partner manages. And rates have to be settable per person, not only per client.

Of the nine here, a firm billing by engagement is usually choosing between Harvest and BigTime, with Clockify as the low-cost option when the invoice is produced in your accounting software anyway. Practice management suites bundle time and billing too, so if you already run one, the integration question comes before the feature comparison.

What each product costs at 10, 25, and 50 users

Nearly everything here prices per user, which makes the arithmetic simple and the growth curve steep. Apart from the QuickBooks Time base fee, there is no flat charge to spread across the team, so headcount multiplies the bill directly. FreshBooks is left out of the table because it is priced for solo operators, as a flat plan plus a charge for each added team member.

Product10 users25 users50 usersNotes
Clockify$40$100$200Basic tier; invoicing starts on Standard
Hubstaff$50$125$250Two-seat minimum applies
Everhour$85$213$425Team tier, five-seat minimum
Toggl$90$225$450Starter tier, invoicing is limited
Harvest$90$225$450Seat fee only; usage fees add on top
QuickBooks Time$120$270$520Base plus per user, after the 2026 increase
Paymo$109$273$545Plus tier, since Solo covers one user
BigTime$200$500$1,000Essentials tier, professional services focus
Monthly cost at the lowest paid tier that supports the stated user count, on annual billing where the vendor discounts for it, verified October 2026, excluding add-ons and promotional discounts. The Harvest figures reflect the seat fee only and understate the bill for accounts on usage-based billing. The QuickBooks Time figures reflect the per-user increase in place by early July 2026 and exclude the required QuickBooks Online subscription.

The spread at 50 users is roughly $800 a month between the cheapest paid option and the most expensive, which is a real budget difference for a firm of that size. Clockify Basic, at $3.99 per user, sets the floor for the whole table, so every other row has to justify its premium with a feature that floor lacks and you actually cannot do without.

Price the feature you are actually buying
Small teams in this category can still track hours for free, and larger ones for a few dollars per user. What the paid tiers sell is some combination of billable rates, invoicing, profitability reporting, approvals, and integrations. Before comparing per-user rates, name the one capability that makes the cheapest tier insufficient for you, then find the cheapest tool that delivers it well. Firms that skip this step routinely pay $9 per user for a product whose core function they could have had for far less, because the paid feature they were actually after sat two tiers higher anyway.

How to choose billing and time tracking software

Five questions settle most of this choice: whether invoices have to leave the tool, whether your people are exempt or non-exempt, which vendors changed their pricing, where the work already lives, and whether you need profitability reporting.

Do you need to send invoices from the tool, or just inform them?
This is the question that decides how much you pay, and for the smallest teams whether you pay anything at all. If hours need to become a sent invoice inside the same product, you need real invoicing and the free tiers thin out quickly. If your bookkeeper or accounting software produces the invoice and you only need accurate hours by client, a free tier or the cheapest paid tier with solid reporting may be a permanent answer rather than a starting point. Be honest about which one you are, because the answer changes the budget by thousands a year at team scale.
Are your people exempt salaried professionals or non-exempt hourly staff?
Billable-hours tracking is not a wage and hour record. If your billable staff are salaried exempt professionals, a billing tool alone generally covers your operational need. If you employ non-exempt hourly people, whether billable or administrative, you have a statutory recordkeeping obligation for actual hours worked and an overtime calculation that a client-billing tool is not designed to satisfy. Confirm which population you have before assuming one system covers both.
Have you priced the vendors whose pricing changed?
Two of the tools here no longer cost what a comparison table suggests. One charges usage fees on top of seats, tied to invoices, projects, clients, and tasks, so a small team with many projects can pay far more than the seat count implies. Another raised its per-employee fee by 25 percent at the entry tier by early July 2026. In both cases, get a quote at your actual volume rather than reading the pricing page, and ask directly about fixed-price options if predictability matters.
Where does the work already live?
Adoption is the failure mode in this category, not features. If your team works inside a project management tool all day, a tracker that embeds into it will be used and a standalone one often will not. If your books are in a particular accounting system, a native integration removes an export step that someone currently does manually every month. Choosing for integration with where work already happens beats choosing for a marginally better feature list.
Do you need profitability reporting or just hours and invoices?
Tracking hours and sending invoices is close to commodity and available cheaply. Knowing whether a client is profitable once unbillable time is accounted for is the capability that separates tiers and vendors, and it frequently sits at a higher plan than buyers expect. If this is the reason you are shopping, check which specific tier includes it at each vendor and compare those numbers, because the ranking at the entry tier tells you nothing about the ranking at the tier you will actually buy.

Before you choose

FirstHR covers the people side of a professional services firm: onboarding, signed paperwork, training, and the employee file. Billable hours and client invoices come from the products above, and a firm shopping for time and billing should buy one of them.

What all nine share is an assumption: the person tracking time is already an employee or contractor in good standing with an account already set up for them. In a professional services firm that assumption carries weight, because billable staff are the product, and every new one arrives with paperwork that no billing tool touches.

What happens before the first billable hourWhere it usually lives
Signed offer letter and employment agreementEmail attachments
Confidentiality agreement and client conflict termsA folder somewhere
Form I-9 within three business daysPaper, often incomplete
Form W-4 and state withholding equivalentPayroll provider, sometimes
Policy and handbook acknowledgmentRarely captured with a signature
Professional certifications and renewal datesRarely tracked systematically

Two of those rows run on federal rules. The employer must complete Section 2 of Form I-9 within three business days of the employee's first day of work, according to the Handbook for Employers from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Form W-4 tells the employer how much federal income tax to withhold from each paycheck.

None of that paperwork is produced by a time and billing tool, and in a firm without a dedicated HR person it typically lands on an operations lead alongside everything else.

FirstHR covers that layer: onboarding workflows with task deadlines, e-signature on offer letters and acknowledgments, document management with an expiry date on each document, training modules with completion records, an org chart, and employee self-service, at a flat $98 a month for up to 10 people or $198 for 11 to 50. We sit alongside your billing tool rather than replacing it.

Key Takeaways
The advertised seat price is unreliable at two vendors. Harvest, now owned by Bending Spoons, layers usage fees for invoices, projects, clients, and tasks on top of its seat rate, and QuickBooks Time raised its per-employee fee by $2 monthly by early July 2026, a 25 percent rise at the entry tier.
Client billing is not a payroll record. Billable-hours tracking answers what to charge; wage and hour recordkeeping answers what an employee is owed and whether overtime was calculated correctly. Firms with non-exempt hourly staff need both, and one rounding rule cannot serve both purposes.
Free is viable for time capture on a small team. Clockify is free for up to five users and Toggl for up to three, with billable rates on paid tiers, so the real question is not which paid tool to buy but which single paid capability makes free insufficient for you.
Profitability reporting is what the higher tiers actually sell. Tracking hours and issuing invoices is close to commodity; knowing whether a client is profitable after unbillable time is the capability that separates vendors and tiers, and it usually sits higher than buyers expect.
Adoption decides the outcome more than features. A tracker embedded where the work already happens gets used, and a standalone one competing for attention frequently does not, which is why integration with existing tools outranks a marginally longer feature list.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is billing and time tracking software?

Software that records hours spent on client work and turns them into an invoice. What separates it from a plain timer is that each tracked hour carries a client and a billable rate, so the bill comes from the time record instead of being rebuilt by hand.

What is the difference between billing time tracking and payroll time tracking?

Billing tracking asks what a client should be charged and protects revenue. Payroll tracking asks what an employee is owed and satisfies a legal recordkeeping obligation. Unbillable time shows the gap: excluded from the invoice, still paid, still counted toward overtime.

How much does billing and time tracking software cost?

From free plans for the smallest teams to roughly $20 per user per month, with most credible team options between about $4 and $11. Because pricing is mostly per user, cost scales close to linearly with headcount. Two vendors changed their pricing in ways that make the advertised rate misleading.

Why did Harvest pricing change?

In early 2026 Harvest, now owned by Bending Spoons, began pairing its per-seat fee with usage charges for invoices, projects, clients, and tasks. A fixed-price Unlimited option exists alongside the usage-based Flex billing, and the free tier stops at a single seat and two projects.

Is free billing and time tracking software good enough?

For time capture on a small team, often yes: Clockify's free plan takes up to five users and Toggl's up to three. Limits usually appear at billable rates and invoicing rather than tracking, so the test is whether invoices must leave the tool or merely be informed by it.

What is accounting time tracking software?

Usually it means time tracking used by accounting and CPA firms to bill their own clients, not accounting software with a timer. An accounting practice bills much like a law firm or agency, so the same category applies.

Do these tools handle rounding and billing increments?

Most support rounding rules, and they should be configured deliberately. Client work is usually billed in six- or fifteen-minute increments. Rounding that works for client billing is limited by wage and hour rules once it sets employee pay, so the two need separate configuration.

Should a small firm pick a specialist or an all-in-one platform?

A specialist is cheaper and faster to adopt if tracking and invoicing are the only broken parts. A platform makes sense if resourcing and project profitability also need solving. Buying a platform to fix a tracking problem tends to fail because only one module gets used.

Do billing tools track employee onboarding or HR records?

No. Every tool here assumes the person tracking time is already onboarded, with an account set up. Hiring paperwork, signed agreements, policy acknowledgments, and the employee file sit outside these platforms.

Make HR the easy part of running your business

Onboarding, e-signatures, training and core HR in one place. Up and running in 5 minutes.

  • 7-day free trial
  • No credit card required
  • Cancel anytime
4.7 on G2300+ companies trust FirstHR