FirstHR

Compensation Trends: What Actually Reaches a Small Employer

The pay trends that reach a small employer: where raise budgets landed, why benefit costs outrun wages, and which states now require a posted range.

Nick Anisimov

Nick Anisimov

FirstHR Founder

Payroll
24 min

Compensation Trends

What the raise budgets, benefit costs, and pay range rules mean for a business with no HR department

Every compensation trends report I get sent is written for a company that has a compensation committee. Salary structure maturity models, geographic differential frameworks, a distribution chart of merit outcomes across nine performance bands. The people who actually email me are working out whether they can give three people a raise in March without wrecking the quarter.

At that size a pay trend is not a planning cycle. It arrives as the renewal quote your broker sends in October, the state that starts requiring a salary range in your job ad, or the Tuesday a candidate asks what the top of the band is and you realize you never set one.

So this is the small employer reading of the pay data. Where raise budgets actually landed, which part of your compensation spend is growing fastest, which disclosure rules reached new states, and which widely reported trends belong to organizations with a compensation department. I rewrite this page once a year, because roughly half of it expires.

TL;DR
US raise budgets have settled between 3 and 3.5 percent, benefit costs are growing faster than wages, and posted pay ranges reached three more states. For a small employer, the practical consequences are a tighter raise pool, a bigger renewal quote, and a range you now have to publish before anyone applies.

What Is Actually Changing in Small Business Pay

Five things are moving in American compensation right now, and every one of them reaches an employer with no compensation department. Each card below states what is shifting and the version of it that lands on an owner, and the sections that follow work through them in the same order.

Raise Budgets Stopped MovingPay
Salary increase budgets have flattened into a band between 3 and 3.5 percent and stayed there across planning cycles. The interesting change is not the average but the spread, which has narrowed to the point that the only real decision left is who gets what share of a fixed pool.
Benefits Are Outgrowing WagesCost
Employer benefit costs are now rising faster than wages and salaries, and health coverage is where almost all of that gap sits. A flat total compensation budget therefore produces a smaller raise pool every year, which is why owners feel poorer than the payroll number suggests.
The Posted Range Keeps SpreadingCompliance
Pay range disclosure has moved from a coastal rule to a default expectation, with three more states switching on during 2026. What decides your exposure is where the work can be performed, so a single remote posting can pull a business into a rule its home state never passed.
The Federal Floors Sat StillCompliance
The federal minimum wage and the salary threshold for the white-collar overtime exemptions both stayed where they were, after a rule that would have raised the second one was vacated in court. State floors did not sit still, which is where the actual compliance work lives.
The Size Gap WidenedStructural
Large establishments spend far more per hour worked than small ones, and the gap is proportionally wider in benefits than in wages. That is a structural fact rather than a trend to respond to, and it should decide which parts of an offer you compete on.

Raise Budgets Have Settled Into a Narrow Band

US salary increase budgets have settled between 3 and 3.5 percent, and that band has held across several planning cycles. The number itself is less useful than what the narrowing implies: employers have stopped competing on the size of the pool and started competing on how sharply they divide it.

SHRM reported in August 2026 that a WTW survey covering more than 34,000 companies in 156 countries, including 1,650 in the United States, expects US salary increase budgets to average 3.4 percent in 2027, against the 3.5 percent employers actually spent in 2026. A separate Gallagher survey of roughly 1,180 employers described the same picture as budgets stabilizing between 3 and 3.5 percent annually.

What the government data shows
Over the twelve months ended June 2026, compensation costs for private industry workers rose 3.3 percent. Wages and salaries were up 3.1 percent, down from 3.5 percent a year earlier, while benefit costs were up 3.8 percent, accelerating from 3.4 percent. Adjusted for inflation, wages and salaries fell 0.4 percent over the same year. (BLS Employment Cost Index, August 2026)

That last figure is the one worth sitting with. A 3 percent increase handed to someone whose real purchasing power went backwards does not read as generosity, and pretending otherwise in the conversation is how a raise turns into a resignation four months later.

What the number isWhere it standsWhat it changes at your size
Salary increase budgets3.4 percent projected for 2027, against 3.5 percent actually spent in 2026A $700,000 wage bill funds about $24,000 of increases. Spread evenly it is invisible; concentrated it keeps two people
Wages and salaries, actualUp 3.1 percent over the year ended June 2026, down from 3.5 percent the year beforeMarket pay is moving more slowly than it was, so a band you built two years ago is closer to current than you assume
Real wagesConstant-dollar wages and salaries fell 0.4 percent over the same twelve monthsYour employees experienced a pay cut. The framing of the raise conversation matters as much as the amount
Benefit costsUp 3.8 percent over the year ended June 2026, accelerating from 3.4 percentTotal compensation spend is climbing faster than your pay bands, and the growth sits in a line nobody thanks you for

The mistake I watch small employers make with a pool this size is spreading it evenly out of fairness. Three percent for everyone is a rounding error on each paycheck and a real cost in aggregate, which is the worst of both outcomes. Deciding how much of a raise to give is easier once you accept that a flat pool cannot buy retention across the whole team.

A better use of the same money is to fund two or three real moves and say plainly why. That is the argument behind a merit increase rather than an across-the-board adjustment, and at small scale it works because you can actually explain the reasoning to each person in a five-minute conversation.

The trend that runs alongside a flat pool is the promotion that arrives without money attached. It has a name now, and it costs more than it saves. A dry promotion buys a few months of goodwill and then produces the exact pay compression problem you will pay to fix when a new hire comes in above the person you promoted.

Still Using Spreadsheets for Onboarding?
Automate documents, training assignments, task management, and track onboarding progress in real time.
See How It Works

Benefit Costs Are Growing Faster Than Wages

Benefit costs for private industry workers rose 3.8 percent over the year ended June 2026 while wages and salaries rose 3.1 percent, and health coverage accounts for most of that gap. For a small employer this is the single most consequential trend on the page, because it quietly shrinks the raise pool before you ever sit down to allocate it.

SHRM reported in July 2026 that total health benefit cost per employee was on pace to rise 6.7 percent for 2026, pushing the average above $18,500 per employee. An August 2026 projection from Aon, drawn from more than 1,100 US employers covering 7.9 million people, put 2027 at 9.5 percent and above $19,000 per employee. Higher healthcare utilization, a rise in chronic conditions, and the growing use of GLP-1 drugs are the factors named as drivers.

Where the money is movingWhat changedThe small employer response
Health plan cost per employeeOn pace to rise 6.7 percent in 2026, above $18,500 per employee, with 9.5 percent projected for 2027Ask for the renewal quote in writing by August rather than October, while changing anything is still possible
Prescription drug coverageEmployers bundling drug coverage with the medical plan fell from 93 percent to 77 percent in a single yearCarving pharmacy out has become a mainstream option rather than a large-employer one. Ask your broker to price both
Paid parental and family leavePaid parental leave rose to 46 percent of employers, up 7 points, and paid family leave to 36 percent, up 5 pointsThis is the benefit candidates ask about, and it is cheap next to health. It is where a small team can genuinely differentiate
Retirement contribution limitsThe 401(k) elective deferral limit rose to $24,500 for 2026 from $23,500, with an $8,000 catch-up at age 50 and overA limit change costs you nothing and is worth one email to the team. The employer match is the part with a budget attached

The survey behind the benefits design numbers is SHRM's 2026 Employee Benefits Survey, published in June 2026 and drawn from 5,472 HR professionals. It also recorded fully insured plans slipping from 70 percent to 67 percent of employers while self-insured arrangements rose from 27 percent to 29 percent, which is worth knowing mostly so you recognize the option when a broker raises it.

The contribution limits come from IRS Notice 2025-67, issued November 13, 2025, which also set an $11,250 catch-up for employees aged 60 through 63. None of that costs an employer anything. It is a payroll setting and a note to the team, and it belongs in the same annual pass as the rest of your benefits decisions.

The renewal timing trap
The most expensive mistake I see is treating the health renewal as a September problem. By the time the quote arrives, plan design changes, a carrier comparison, and any conversation with the team about a higher deductible are all compressed into a few weeks before open enrollment. Put a reminder in June to request the quote, and budget the increase at the top of the projected range rather than the middle. If it comes in lower, you have found your raise pool.

There is a framing point underneath all of this. When benefits absorb the growth, the raise looks smaller than the money you spent, and employees have no way of seeing the difference unless you show them. A total rewards statement is a one-page fix for that, and at small scale it is a spreadsheet rather than a project.

Posted Pay Ranges Keep Reaching New States

Three states added a pay range requirement to job postings in 2026, on top of the states that already had one. Virginia began on July 1, 2026, Maine on July 29, 2026, and Connecticut follows on October 1, 2026, moving from disclosure on request to disclosure in the posting itself under Public Act 26-12.

Virginia is the broadest of the three. Under section 40.1-28.7:12, every job posting or hiring advertisement in the state has to carry a wage or salary range, and the Virginia Department of Labor and Industry pairs that with a ban on seeking compensation history from an applicant, a former employer, or a third-party service. There is no headcount threshold in the posting rule.

Maine set its threshold at 10 or more employees. According to the Maine Department of Labor, covered employers must include the anticipated pay range in advertisements for available positions, give a current employee the range for their own position on request, and keep records of positions and pay history for the length of employment plus three years after separation.

The rule that decides your exposure
Coverage almost never turns on where your business is incorporated. It turns on where the work can be performed, which means one fully remote posting can pull a company into the disclosure rules of a state it has never operated in. If you post remote roles at all, the practical strategy is to write one good faith range and use it everywhere rather than maintaining a matrix of state-specific postings.

What this changes operationally is smaller than it sounds and larger than most owners expect. Writing the range is a twenty-minute exercise the first time and a five-minute one afterwards. The uncomfortable part is that publishing it forces you to answer questions you had been deferring, starting with what the top of the band is and whether anyone currently sits above it.

The second-order effect is the one worth planning for. Once a range is public, your existing employees read it, and a posting that opens above what a current employee earns is a conversation you will have whether or not you scheduled it. Run a quick pay equity pass before the first posting goes live rather than after.

The Legal Floors Underneath Your Pay Decisions

Two federal numbers set the outer edges of every pay decision you make, and neither moved: the federal minimum wage is still $7.25 an hour, and the salary threshold for the executive, administrative, and professional exemptions is still $684 a week, or $35,568 a year.

The overtime number has a history worth knowing, because a lot of small employers budgeted for a higher figure that never arrived. The 2024 rule that would have raised the threshold was vacated by the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in November 2024. In May 2026 the Department of Labor issued a technical amendment removing the vacated language from the Code of Federal Regulations and republishing the 2019 regulations, which is where the $684 figure and the $107,432 highly compensated employee threshold both come from.

Check the salary, then check the duties
A salary above $684 a week does not make anyone exempt on its own. The duties test decides it, and job titles decide nothing at all. If you have someone on a salary who spends most of their time on routine work rather than on the judgment and discretion the exemption describes, the safest position is to treat them as non-exempt and track the hours. The cost of being wrong is back wages plus liquidated damages, which arrives all at once.

The Department of Labor is explicit that many states set higher minimums and that an employer has to comply with both, so the binding number is whichever is higher where the person works. That is the part that actually moves each January, and it moves without anyone notifying you. If you employ people in more than one state, the annual check is not optional.

What a Small Employer Actually Spends Per Hour

Private establishments with fewer than 100 workers spent $37.97 per hour worked on total compensation in March 2026, against $68.03 at establishments with 500 or more workers. The gap is proportionally wider in benefits than in wages, and that single fact should decide which parts of an offer you try to compete on.

Establishment sizeTotal compensation per hourWages and salariesBenefitsBenefits as a share
1 to 99 workers$37.97$27.98$9.9926.3 percent
All private industry$46.60$32.60$14.0130.1 percent
500 or more workers$68.03$44.07$23.9535.2 percent
Where the size gap really sits
A large establishment spends 2.4 times as much per hour on benefits as a small one ($23.95 against $9.99), while spending 1.6 times as much on wages ($44.07 against $27.98). Benefits make up 35.2 percent of compensation cost at 500 or more workers and 26.3 percent below 100. (BLS Employer Costs for Employee Compensation, March 2026)

Read that as a strategy note rather than a complaint. You are not going to out-benefit a company many times your size, and building a plan around trying is how small employers end up with a benefits bill they cannot sustain through a slow quarter. The honest position is to pay competitively in cash, cover health at a level you can hold through a bad year, and win on the things a large employer structurally cannot promise an individual.

Those things are real and they are free. A schedule that does not change without notice. A named person who answers a question the same day. A decision made this week instead of next quarter. Speed is the advantage most small employers never price, and it shows up in labor cost terms as a shorter vacancy and less overtime paid to cover it.

It also means your benchmarking has to be size-aware. National medians blend in employers with a compensation department and a benefits budget you do not have, so a range built straight off a national median will read high. Salary benchmarking at small scale is mostly the discipline of matching the scope of the job rather than the title.

Companies Using FirstHR Onboard 3x Faster
Join hundreds of small businesses who transformed their new hire experience.
See It in Action

Compensation Trends You Can Ignore at Your Size

Knowing what to skip matters as much as knowing what to adopt, because the person reading compensation trends at a small company is usually the same person running payroll. Five recurring themes in compensation coverage do not translate below a few hundred employees.

Enterprise compensation trendWhy it does not apply at small scale
Geographic pay differential frameworksBuilt to price the same job across dozens of metros. With one or two remote employees, you pick a rule and write it down in a sentence
Regression-based pay equity auditsStatistical models need enough people per job group to mean anything. At small scale the honest method is reading every pay rate against its range and writing down the reason for each gap
Long-term incentive and equity refresh designRefresh grant cycles assume a valuation process and a board committee. Most small companies should decide whether equity exists at all before designing its cadence
Nine-box merit matricesA matrix distributes a pool across performance and position-in-range cells. With eight employees you have fewer people than cells, and the matrix is doing arithmetic you can do in your head
Job architecture and skills-based pay projectsA leveling framework across hundreds of roles is a year of work. The small business version is a one-page list of your roles with a range next to each one

Ignoring these is not falling behind. A ten-person company that runs a regression analysis instead of publishing a range has optimized the wrong layer, and the same filter applies to the broader small business HR trends conversation: does this address a constraint you actually have this year?

How to Refresh Your Pay Picture Once a Year

An annual compensation review takes about ninety minutes and replaces the version where somebody asks for a raise and you decide on the spot. Run it in the same month every year, because most of the value comes from the comparison with last year rather than from this year in isolation.

1
Add up what employment actually cost you
Wages, employer payroll taxes, the employer share of health premiums, the retirement match, and everything else you pay because a person is on the team. Divide by headcount, then compare with last year and note how much of the increase went to wages rather than benefits.
2
Put every person against a current range
One row each, with the low, middle, and high of the market range beside their current pay. Refresh the ranges rather than reusing what you had at hire, because a two-year-old range is a two-year-old answer.
3
Size the pool before you allocate any of it
Decide the dollar amount you can genuinely fund, express it as a percentage of total wages, and only then work out who gets what. Doing it in the other order produces a pool defined by the promises you already made.
4
Date the rules that reach you
State minimum wage for every state you employ in, every exempt salary against the current thresholds, and the posting rules for every state you advertise into. Anything you cannot put a date next to is overdue for a check.
5
Write down the decisions and the reasons
One line per person: what they got, why, and what would have to be true for a different answer next year. This is the document that makes the following review take half as long and defends the decision if anyone ever asks.

The worksheet below carries the accounting half of that: step one in full, the exposure counts that come out of step two, the single number step three starts from, and the dated list in step four. It fits on a page and it wants the payroll register and the renewal invoice open beside it. What it deliberately does not do is allocate. Who gets what share of the pool is the next sitting, it belongs with the performance conversation rather than with the arithmetic, and it is much easier once this page is filled in.

Annual Pay Cost and Compliance Check
ANNUAL PAY COST AND COMPLIANCE CHECK

One page, once a year, filled in before the raise conversation starts. It answers the two questions an owner cannot answer from memory: what employing people actually cost over the last twelve months, and which of the rules underneath every pay decision have been checked recently enough to rely on.
It stops deliberately short of individual numbers. Who receives what is a separate sitting with the performance conversation attached, and it goes better starting from a filled-in page than from a guess.
Company: Headcount today: Headcount twelve months ago:
Completed by: Date: Next review due:
SECTION 1, WHAT EMPLOYMENT ACTUALLY COST

Pull these from the payroll register and the invoices, not from memory.
Wages and salaries paid in the last twelve months:
Employer payroll taxes:
Employer share of health premiums:
Retirement match paid:
Everything else you pay because a person is employed here:
Total employment cost:
Total employment cost divided by headcount:
Change from the prior year, in dollars: As a percentage:
SECTION 2, HOW MUCH OF THE INCREASE WAS PAY

This is the section that explains why a compensation bill that grew does not feel like generosity to anyone receiving it.
Increase in wages and salaries, in dollars: As a percentage:
Increase in benefit cost, in dollars: As a percentage:
Share of the total increase absorbed by benefits rather than wages:
Health renewal, quote requested on: Received on:
Increase quoted: Increase after plan changes:
What this year's cost growth leaves you able to fund in increases:
Carry that last figure into the raise cycle. Dividing it is the next exercise, not this one.
SECTION 3, WHO THE MARKET LEFT BEHIND

Counts rather than a per-person table. You are looking for exposure that got expensive while you were not watching, and for ranges too stale to trust.
People paid below the bottom of a range you pulled this month:
People whose pay has not moved in more than eighteen months:
People you would have to replace above what you currently pay them:
People you would struggle to replace at any price:
Roles still priced off a range more than twelve months old:
Roles that need a fresh range before the next posting goes live:
SECTION 4, THE RULES THAT APPLY TO YOU

Write the date each item was last checked, not that it exists somewhere.
State minimum wage, for every state you employ in:
Every exempt salary, against the current federal and state thresholds:
Pay range disclosure rules, for every state you post into:
Salary history questions removed from the application and the interview script:
A written range on file for every open role:
States you began employing or advertising into this year:
Items you could not date:
Owner of each one, with a deadline:
SECTION 5, WHAT CHANGES THIS YEAR

Pick two. Two done beats nine listed.
Change 1: Owner: Done by:
Change 2: Owner: Done by:
What you deliberately decided not to do, and why:

One caution on section 4 of that worksheet. It is a prompt to check dates, not legal advice, and wage rules vary by state more than almost any other area of employment law. Confirm each item against your state labor agency before you treat the page as complete, and treat a state you newly employ in as a fresh check rather than an extension of the last one.

The part of this that software should carry is the record keeping rather than the judgment. Pay decisions, offer letters, and the range you posted all need to be findable a year later, which is exactly the trail that gets lost when a new hire's paperwork lives in an inbox. FirstHR keeps the offer, the signed documents, and the employee record together from the day someone accepts, so the annual review starts from a file rather than from memory. What each person should be paid stays a decision a human makes and can explain.

Key Takeaways
US salary increase budgets have settled between 3 and 3.5 percent, so the meaningful decision left to a small employer is how sharply to divide a fixed pool rather than how large to make it.
Benefit costs rose 3.8 percent over the year ended June 2026 against 3.1 percent for wages, which means a flat compensation budget produces a smaller raise pool each year.
Health plan cost per employee was on pace to rise 6.7 percent in 2026 and is projected at 9.5 percent for 2027, so request the renewal quote in June and budget the increase at the top of the range.
Three states added a pay range posting requirement during 2026, and coverage turns on where the work can be performed rather than where the business is incorporated.
The federal minimum wage of $7.25 and the $684 weekly exempt salary threshold both held steady, so the annual compliance work is at the state level, where floors move each January.
Small establishments spend $37.97 per hour on compensation against $68.03 at large ones, with the gap widest in benefits, so compete on cash, speed, and predictability rather than on plan design.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the biggest compensation trends for small businesses right now?

Five shifts define pay for a small employer at the moment: salary increase budgets that have flattened into a band between 3 and 3.5 percent, benefit costs growing faster than wages, pay range disclosure spreading to more states, federal wage and overtime floors that have not moved while state floors keep climbing, and a widening spending gap between small and large employers. Bureau of Labor Statistics data for the year ended June 2026 tells most of that story in two numbers: wages and salaries for private industry workers rose 3.1 percent while benefit costs rose 3.8 percent. The practical version for an owner is that the raise pool is smaller than the total compensation increase, because the difference is absorbed by a health plan renewal that nobody experiences as a raise.

How much should a small business budget for raises?

Most US employers are budgeting between 3 and 3.5 percent of total wages. A WTW survey covering more than 34,000 companies, reported by SHRM in August 2026, has US budgets averaging 3.4 percent for 2027 after employers spent 3.5 percent in 2026, and a Gallagher survey of roughly 1,180 employers describes the same band. For a small business the average matters less than the arithmetic. A 3.4 percent pool on a $700,000 wage bill is roughly $24,000, which is either a token increase for everyone or a real one for the three people you could not replace at the price you currently pay them. I would rather fund the second version and be able to explain the decision than spread a pool so thin that nobody notices it arrived.

Why are benefit costs rising faster than wages?

Health coverage is the reason. Over the year ended June 2026 the Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Cost Index put benefit costs for private industry workers up 3.8 percent against 3.1 percent for wages and salaries, and the health line explains most of that spread. SHRM coverage in July 2026 had the average total health benefit cost per employee on track to clear $18,500 after a 6.7 percent rise, and an August 2026 Aon projection drawn from more than 1,100 US employers and 7.9 million covered people had 2027 landing at 9.5 percent and more than $19,000 a head. Higher healthcare utilization, a rise in chronic conditions, and the growing use of GLP-1 drugs get named as the drivers. What that does to a small employer is arithmetic: hold total compensation flat and the raise pool shrinks, because the health renewal takes its increase first.

Which states now require a salary range in job postings?

Three states added a posting requirement during 2026, on top of the states that already had one. Virginia began requiring a wage or salary range in every job posting on July 1, 2026, paired with a ban on asking an applicant for salary history. Maine followed on July 29, 2026 for employers with 10 or more employees, requiring the anticipated pay range in advertisements, the range on request from a current employee, and pay records kept for the length of employment plus three years. Connecticut follows on October 1, 2026 under Public Act 26-12, moving from disclosure on request to a wage range and a general benefits description in public and internal advertisements. California, Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Vermont, and Washington were already there. Coverage turns on where the work can be performed, so a remote posting often reaches a rule you do not live under.

Did the federal overtime salary threshold change?

No. The salary threshold for the executive, administrative, and professional exemptions under the Fair Labor Standards Act is still $684 a week, or $35,568 a year, and the highly compensated employee threshold is still $107,432. The 2024 rule that would have lifted both figures was struck down by a federal court in Texas in November 2024, and in May 2026 the Department of Labor republished the 2019 regulations to match, which is where those two numbers come from. The federal minimum wage has been $7.25 an hour since July 24, 2009. What actually moves sits at the state level, where minimum wages and, in some states, exempt salary thresholds climb on their own schedules, and where the higher of the two standards is the one that binds you.

How often should a small business review compensation?

Once a year, on a date you choose rather than the day somebody asks for a raise. An annual review has three parts that take about half an hour each: what you actually spent on employment over the last twelve months, where every person sits against a current market range, and how large a raise pool you can genuinely fund. Add a fourth pass over the rules that reach you, because state minimum wages, exempt salary thresholds, and pay range disclosure requirements all change on schedules that have nothing to do with your fiscal year. Running the review in the same month every year matters more than running it perfectly the first time, because most of the value comes from the comparison with last year’s page rather than from this year’s numbers in isolation.

Ready to transform your onboarding?

7-day free trial No credit card required
Start Your Free Trial