FirstHR

ADP RUN Alternatives: 10 Platforms Compared

ADP RUN alternatives compared on published pricing, real cost at 10, 25, and 50 employees, and which platform fits your reason for leaving.

Nick Anisimov

Nick Anisimov

FirstHR Founder

Payroll
17 min

ADP RUN Alternatives

Ten payroll platforms compared on what they publish, what they actually cost at 10, 25, and 50 employees, and which one matches the reason you started looking

Almost nobody shops for a payroll provider because payroll broke. RUN Powered by ADP files taxes in every US jurisdiction, produces W-2 and 1099 forms, and has been doing both for longer than most of the companies on this page have existed. The reason a 20-person business starts looking is smaller and more specific: the invoice grew without an explanation, the one feature they need sits in a package they are not on, the person who set them up stopped answering, or a renewal arrived with terms nobody remembered agreeing to.

That matters for how you shop. If you replace a payroll platform without naming the reason you are leaving, you tend to buy the same shape of product again and repeat the problem 18 months later. A team leaving over cost needs a different answer than a team leaving because scheduling and the time clock live somewhere else.

So this comparison is organized around the reason. Ten platforms, each matched to a situation, with every price taken from the vendor pricing page in August 2026 and a plain note wherever a vendor publishes nothing at all.

TL;DR
ADP does not publish RUN pricing, which is the most common reason a small employer starts shopping. Gusto and OnPay both publish $49 per month plus $6 per person. Patriot is cheapest at $37 plus $5. Square Payroll and Homebase suit hourly teams. Paychex Flex, Rippling, and the TriNet HR Platform still quote rather than publish.

Why small businesses leave ADP RUN

Four reasons cover most departures: a price nobody can look up, a feature that sits one package higher, a support relationship that changes after implementation, and contract terms that only become visible at renewal. None of them is a failure of the payroll engine, which is why the switch is usually a fit decision rather than a rescue.

The price is quoted, not published

ADP lists four RUN packages on its own product page: Essential Payroll, Enhanced Payroll, Complete Payroll and HR Plus, and HR Pro Payroll and HR. It lists no price for any of them. Every package routes to a Get Pricing form or a phone number, which means two businesses of identical size can pay materially different amounts and neither can check the other.

The same page advertises three months free for new small business payroll customers. Promotions are normal, but they change what your early invoices tell you. The number worth planning around is the one that applies in month four, and that number does not appear anywhere public. Compare that with the published rate cards on most of the alternatives below, where a 25-person bill can be calculated in ten seconds.

The module you need sits one package up

RUN is tiered, and time tracking and HR tools vary by package. That is a reasonable way to sell software, but it produces a specific frustration for small employers: needing one capability moves the entire account up a tier, and the tier price is quoted rather than posted. You cannot tell in advance whether adding a time clock costs $20 a month or $200.

The support relationship changes after implementation

ADP includes 24/7 support across the RUN packages, which is more than several platforms here offer at any price. The recurring theme in customer reviews is not the availability of support but the difference between the attentive implementation period and the steady state that follows it. If your reason for leaving is that nobody knows your account anymore, note that the vendors who compete on that ground, Paychex Flex and the PEO options, sell service relationships and quote accordingly.

The terms only matter at renewal

Contract length, automatic renewal, and notice periods are not published next to the packages, so the service agreement is the only reliable source. Before signing anything, with ADP or a replacement, get four things in writing: the initial term, whether it renews automatically, how much notice cancellation requires, and the full fee schedule including year-end forms and off-cycle runs.

Changing providers does not move the tax liability
The IRS is explicit that employers who outsource payroll remain ultimately responsible for income tax withheld and both halves of Social Security and Medicare tax. If a provider fails to deposit or file, the employer still owes the money and the penalties (IRS). Whichever platform you land on, keep verifying deposits yourself through your own EFTPS enrollment rather than trusting a dashboard.
If you are leaving becauseLook atWhy it fits
The bill keeps climbingPatriot Software$37 plus $5 per worker paid, published
You cannot get a straight priceGusto or OnPayBoth publish $49 plus $6 per person
Features are gated by tierOnPayOne payroll plan with multi-state and year-end forms in it
Scheduling and the clock are missingHomebasePayroll attached to scheduling and a time clock
You already run a Square registerSquare Payroll$35 plus $6 per person, timecards in one system
You mostly pay contractorsSquare Payroll$6 per contractor per month, no base fee
Benefits are the real problemJustworksPEO pooling with published per-employee rates
HR and IT are separate systemsRipplingOne employee record across payroll, HR, and IT

10 ADP RUN alternatives at a glance

Every platform below can run full-service US payroll with federal, state, and local tax filing, though for Homebase, Rippling, and the TriNet HR Platform payroll is a module or add-on rather than the core product. The columns that separate them are whether the rate card is public, how the price is structured, and what a 25-person payroll actually costs.

PlatformBest ForPublished PricePricing ModelFull Rate PublishedCost at 25
GustoThe straightforward replacement$49 + $6/personBase + PEPM$199
OnPayOne payroll plan, no tiers$49 + $6/workerBase + PEPM$199
Patriot SoftwareThe lowest published bill$37 + $5/workerBase + PEPM$162
SurePayrollVery small and household payrolls$29 + $7/workerBase + PEPM$204
Square PayrollTeams already on a Square register$35 + $6/personBase + PEPM$185
HomebaseHourly teams needing scheduling$39 + $6/employeeAdd-on + PEPM$189
RipplingPayroll wired to HR and ITQuoteQuoteQuote
Paychex FlexA like-for-like service vendorQuoteQuoteQuote
JustworksBenefits through a PEO$50 + $8/employeeBase + PEPM$250
TriNet HR PlatformHR first with payroll attachedQuoteQuoteQuote
Rates taken from each vendor pricing page in August 2026. PEPM = per employee per month. Cost at 25 is the entry plan base fee plus 25 per-person fees, before add-ons, benefits premiums, promotional discounts, and per-state charges. Gusto figures are the Simple plan. Homebase is the payroll add-on price and sits on top of a Homebase plan. Justworks figures are the standalone Payroll plan, not the PEO plans, which are published separately at $79 and $124 per employee. Rippling, Paychex, and the TriNet HR Platform publish no rates at all.
Still Using Spreadsheets for Onboarding?
Automate documents, training assignments, task management, and track onboarding progress in real time.
See How It Works

How we evaluated these alternatives

Every platform here had to be something a US small business can buy and operate without a dedicated payroll administrator, and had to be a genuine replacement for RUN rather than an adjacent tool. Mid-market and enterprise systems that require an implementation project were left out.

Is the price published?
The single most common complaint about RUN is that the rate card is private, so a replacement that also hides its pricing solves nothing. Seven of the ten platforms here publish a full base and per-person rate. The three that do not are included anyway, because a quote-only vendor is the right answer for some situations, but they are labeled clearly and excluded from the cost table rather than filled in with estimates.
Does the entry plan do the job, or is it bait?
An entry tier that cannot run payroll in a second state, or that leaves out time tracking, is not the plan you will end up on. We noted where a common requirement forces an upgrade and priced the realistic tier instead. Gusto Simple is the clearest example: it covers one state, so a single out-of-state hire moves a 25-person payroll from $199 to $380 a month on Plus.
What does it cost at 50 employees, not at 5?
Per-employee pricing compounds, and the gap between platforms widens as you grow. We modeled 10, 25, and 50 employees from published base and per-person rates so the trajectory is visible rather than implied. At 10 employees the published options sit within about $40 of each other. At 50 the same options spread across a range of more than $150 a month before any add-ons.
Does it match how the team is actually paid?
A restaurant with rotating shifts and a design studio with 12 salaried people have almost nothing in common at the pay run, even at the same headcount. Platforms built around scheduling and a time clock were scored for hourly teams, and platforms built around the pay run and tax filing were scored for salaried teams. The wrong shape costs more in workarounds than it saves in subscription fees.

The 10 alternatives reviewed

#1Gusto
Best for a straightforward replacement with published pricing
Price: Simple $49/mo + $6/person, Plus $80 + $12, Premium $180 + $22Cost at 10 / 25 / 50: $109 / $199 / $349 on SimpleNote: Simple runs payroll in one state only

Gusto is where most small employers land when they leave RUN, and the reason is structural rather than emotional: the price is on the website. Simple is $49 per month plus $6 per person, Plus is $80 plus $12, and Premium is $180 plus $22, all published on the Gusto pricing page. Federal, state, and local tax filing is automatic, unlimited payroll runs are included, and billing is month to month.

The variable to model before you sign is state count. Simple covers a single state, so one hire across a line moves you to Plus and roughly doubles the per-person rate, taking a 25-person payroll from $199 to $380 a month. Plus is also where multi-state payroll and built-in time tracking live, so a team that used the RUN time module should price Plus from the start rather than Simple.

Pros
Full rate card published for all three tiers, no sales call required
Automated federal, state, and local tax filing with unlimited runs
Month-to-month billing rather than an annual term
Plus adds multi-state payroll and time tracking without a second vendor
Cons
Simple covers one state, so a single out-of-state hire forces an upgrade
Time tracking is not included in the entry plan
Plus reaches $680 per month at 50 employees
Premium at $180 plus $22 per person is a large step for a small team
#2OnPay
Best for one payroll plan with no tiers to climb
Price: Payroll Essentials $49/month + $6 per worker; HR add-on $15 + $2Cost at 10 / 25 / 50: $109 / $199 / $349Note: Pay workers in as many states as you need, no surcharge

OnPay answers the tier complaint by selling payroll as one plan instead of three. Payroll Essentials is $49 per month plus $6 per worker, and the payroll side is all in it: federal, state, and local tax filing, W-2 and 1099 workers, payroll in multiple states, unlimited pay runs and schedules, benefits administration, and year-end filings. OnPay states plainly that it does not charge extra to pay workers in as many states as you need and adds no implementation or integration fees, which removes most of the line items that make a payroll invoice creep.

Read the add-on line before you assume everything is included, though. HR sits outside the base plan at $15 per month plus $2 per worker, and that is where PTO management, onboarding workflows, org charts, and document storage live, with Compliance Resources at $10 and Live HR Support at $75 on top of that. For a business leaving RUN over surprise charges rather than the headline rate, the payroll side is still the cleanest structure here. The trade-off is depth: a team that wants applicant tracking or learning modules will be buying that elsewhere.

Pros
One payroll plan with no tier to climb for a payroll feature
Pay workers in as many states as you need at no extra charge
Unlimited pay runs with no implementation or integration fees
W-2s, 1099s, and year-end filings included rather than billed separately
Cons
HR tooling is a paid add-on at $15 per month plus $2 per worker
No native applicant tracking or learning management
Interface is functional rather than polished
Not designed for companies growing past a few hundred employees
#3Patriot Software
Best for the lowest published bill
Price: Full Service $37/mo + $5 per worker paid; Basic $17 + $4Cost at 10 / 25 / 50: $87 / $162 / $287Note: 30 days free plus 50 percent off for six months

Patriot has the lowest published full-service price in the category. Full Service Payroll is $37 per month plus $5 per worker paid, with federal, state, and local tax filing included. Basic Payroll is $17 plus $4 and leaves the deposits and returns to you, which is a real option for a single-state employer with a simple deposit schedule and a bad month, and a bad idea for everyone else.

Two add-ons are worth pricing up front, because both are things RUN customers often have bundled already: time and attendance is $6 per month plus $2 per employee, and HR software is the same. Additional state filings are $12 per month per state, so a company with people in three states pays $24 a month on top. Even loaded up, it usually lands under the alternatives, and there is a 30-day free trial plus 50 percent off for six months.

Pros
Lowest published full-service price at $37 per month plus $5 per worker paid
Charges per worker paid, so a light month costs less
Time and attendance and HR add-ons priced transparently at $6 plus $2
30 days free plus 50 percent off the first six months
Cons
$12 per month for each additional state adds up for distributed teams
Basic plan leaves you filing your own deposits and returns
Time tracking and HR are separate paid modules, not included
Plain interface with fewer integrations than the larger platforms
#4SurePayroll
Best for very small payrolls and household employers
Price: $29/month + $7 per worker; nanny and household $45/month including one employeeCost at 10 / 25 / 50: $99 / $204 / $379Note: Multi-state payroll is a flat $9.99 per month

SurePayroll has the lowest base fee of any full-service option here at $29 per month, with a $7 per-worker charge that makes it a value play below roughly 15 people and an expensive one above 30. Federal and state tax filing, new hire reporting, unlimited runs, and free two-day direct deposit are included. Multi-state is a flat $9.99 per month rather than a charge per state, which beats per-state pricing for a scattered team, though the page notes a separate fee applies in areas that require local taxes.

Three things to know before you switch. Year-end forms are not in the subscription: SurePayroll bills W-2 and 1099-NEC filing annually at a $50 base fee plus $5 per form, so a 25-person payroll adds roughly $175 every January that the monthly figure does not show. SurePayroll is also a Paychex company, so a business leaving one national provider is moving to a product owned by another, which matters if the reason for leaving was the vendor rather than the price. And the household plan at $45 per month including one employee is the strongest option here for anyone paying a nanny or caregiver, a case most business payroll platforms handle badly. Other add-ons are priced separately too: accounting integration is $4.99 per month and time clock integration starts at $5 per month plus $3 per employee.

Pros
Lowest base fee at $29 per month with tax filing included
Flat $9.99 monthly multi-state charge rather than per-state pricing
Dedicated nanny and household plan at $45 per month including one employee
Unlimited payroll runs with free two-day direct deposit
Cons
$7 per worker is the highest per-person rate among the budget options
Year-end W-2 and 1099-NEC filing is billed separately at $50 plus $5 per form
Accounting and time clock integrations are billed as add-ons
Owned by Paychex, which matters if you are leaving a national vendor on principle
#5Square Payroll
Best for hourly teams already running a Square register
Price: $35/month + $6 per person paid; contractor-only $6 per person, no base feeCost at 10 / 25 / 50: $95 / $185 / $335Note: Contractor-only payroll has no monthly base

Square Payroll is $35 per month plus $6 per person paid, and it is the obvious move for a restaurant, salon, or retail shop that already takes payments through Square. Timecards, tips, and hours come from the same system that rings up the sale, which removes the integration that usually sits between a point of sale and a pay run. It is a better structural fit for that business than a general payroll platform is, at a price below most of them.

The contractor-only tier is the sharper deal: $6 per person per month with no base fee at all. A business that pays six contractors and no employees spends $36 a month, which is less than the base fee alone on several alternatives. If that describes you, compare it against the dedicated contractor payroll options before defaulting to a full platform.

Pros
Contractor-only payroll at $6 per person with no monthly base fee
Timecards and tips flow from the same system that takes payments
Charges per person paid, so seasonal months cost less
Strong fit for restaurants, retail, and service businesses
Cons
Value drops sharply if you do not use Square for payments
Lighter HR functionality than the payroll-plus-HR platforms
Built around hourly and tipped work rather than salaried teams
Fewer benefits and retirement options than the national providers
#6Homebase
Best for shift teams that need scheduling and a time clock
Price: Payroll add-on $39/month + $6 per employee paid; plans free to $120 per locationCost at 10 / 25 / 50: $99 / $189 / $339 for the payroll add-onNote: Plan fees are charged per location

Homebase inverts the usual arrangement. It is a scheduling and time clock product first, with payroll available as an add-on at $39 per month plus $6 per employee paid. For a business whose real problem is that shifts, breaks, and hours live in one system and pay lives in another, that is the correct shape, and it removes the integration RUN customers usually maintain between a time module and the pay run.

Price the plan underneath before you compare. Homebase plans run from a free Basic tier through Essentials at $30, Plus at $70, and All-in-One at $120 per location per month, with 20 percent off for annual billing. Basic is the one to check: it is free, but only up to 10 employees at a single location, so anyone modeling 25 or 50 people is on a paid plan by definition. Multi-location businesses should read that per location carefully too, because two sites double the plan fee even though the payroll add-on does not change.

Pros
Scheduling, time clock, and payroll in one system with no integration to maintain
Payroll add-on published at $39 per month plus $6 per employee paid
Free Basic plan for up to 10 employees at a single location
Built specifically for hourly and shift-based teams
Cons
Plan fees are charged per location, so multi-site businesses pay repeatedly
Payroll is an add-on rather than the core product
Weak fit for salaried, desk-based teams
Less depth in benefits and retirement than the national providers
Companies Using FirstHR Onboard 3x Faster
Join hundreds of small businesses who transformed their new hire experience.
See It in Action
#7Rippling
Best for payroll wired to HR and IT on one record
Price: Quote. Rippling publishes no rate for the platform or for payrollCost at 10 / 25 / 50: QuoteNote: The pricing page is a custom quote form

Rippling sells a single employee record shared by payroll, HR, and IT provisioning. Hire someone once and the same action can open payroll, order a laptop, and create their accounts, which is genuine automation rather than a feature list. It is also modular, so what you pay depends entirely on which products you switch on.

The catch is that Rippling publishes no rate for any of it. Its pricing page is a form that asks which services you need and promises a custom quote in return, so there is no base fee, no per-employee figure, and no way to model a bill before you talk to sales. If you are leaving RUN because you are tired of quotes, this is the wrong destination. If you are leaving because your HR and payroll systems do not talk to each other and you have IT overhead to consolidate, it is the strongest platform in that direction.

Pros
One employee record across payroll, HR, and IT provisioning
Deepest automation in the category once configured
Handles multi-state registration inside the same workflow
Scales into the mid-market without replatforming
Cons
No published rate for the platform or for the payroll module
The pricing page is a quote form rather than a rate card
A sales conversation is required before you see any figure
More platform than a 15-person business without IT complexity needs
#8Paychex Flex
Best like-for-like replacement with a service relationship
Price: Quote. Five packages, each with a Request Pricing buttonCost at 10 / 25 / 50: QuoteNote: Packages run from Flex Select through HR PEO

Paychex is the closest structural match to ADP, which cuts both ways. Its packages are Paychex Flex Select, Flex Pro, Flex Enterprise, HR Pro, and HR PEO, and its comparison page shows a Request Pricing button next to every one of them rather than a rate. If the reason you are leaving RUN is that you cannot look up your own price, this changes nothing.

What it does change is the relationship. Paychex competes on service depth, compliance coverage, and the ability to buy payroll, benefits, retirement, and HR support from one vendor, which is what a company that outgrew self-serve software usually wants. It is also worth knowing that SurePayroll, further up this list, is a Paychex company, so the two are alternatives to ADP but not to each other in any structural sense.

Pros
Full-service tax filing and compliance across all US jurisdictions
Payroll, benefits, retirement, and HR support from a single vendor
Service model built around named contacts at higher packages
Package range extends from small business into the mid-market
Cons
No published rates on any of the five packages
Solves the service complaint but not the pricing transparency complaint
Contract terms are negotiated per account rather than posted
More platform than a self-serve small team needs
#9Justworks
Best for small teams buying benefits through a PEO
Price: Payroll $50/month + $8 per employee; PEO Basic $79 and PEO Plus $124 per employeeCost at 10 / 25 / 50: $130 / $250 / $450 on the Payroll planNote: PEO rates exclude insurance premiums and workers comp

Justworks runs two products under one name, and unusually for this end of the market it publishes rates for both. The standalone Payroll plan is $50 per month plus $8 per employee and comes with HR tools and expert support, with time tracking sold alongside it as an $8 per employee add-on. That puts it above the budget platforms and below the quote-only vendors. That is ordinary software, priced ordinarily.

The PEO plans are the actual reason companies move here. A professional employer organization co-employs your staff, which lets a 20-person business buy health coverage priced off a much larger risk pool. Justworks lists PEO Basic at $79 per employee per month and PEO Plus at $124, both before health premiums and workers compensation, which are pass-through costs on top. Co-employment is a structural change rather than a software swap.

Pros
Standalone Payroll plan published at $50 per month plus $8 per employee
PEO pooling gives small teams access to larger-group benefits pricing
PEO Basic and PEO Plus rates are published at $79 and $124 per employee
Support is included rather than tied to a premium tier
Cons
PEO Plus at $124 per employee is a steep step up from the Payroll plan
Health premiums and workers compensation are separate pass-through costs
Co-employment changes your legal structure, not just your software
Payroll plan is more expensive than the budget platforms at every headcount
#10TriNet HR Platform
Best for an HR-first platform with payroll attached
Price: Quote. TriNet publishes no rates for the HR PlatformCost at 10 / 25 / 50: QuoteNote: TriNet still labels this product TriNet Zenefits

The TriNet HR Platform is what Zenefits became after the acquisition, and the rename matters when you are searching, because a lot of the comparison content still circulating uses the old brand and the old rate card. TriNet has not buried the lineage either: zenefits.com now redirects to trinet.com, the platform sits under the HR Plus product line, and TriNet still labels the customer login as the HR Platform, also known as TriNet Zenefits. It is an HR-first system with benefits administration at the center and payroll available as part of the configuration, which suits a company whose pain is enrollment and records rather than the pay run itself.

The catch is the same as with Paychex. TriNet publishes no plan names and no per-employee rates; its pricing page says only that the model is per employee per month and that the figure depends on company size and service level, then asks you to fill in a form. Any per-employee figure you find on a review site is either a third-party estimate or a legacy Zenefits price, and neither predicts a current quote. Treat it as a shortlist candidate for benefits depth, not as an escape from opaque pricing.

Pros
Benefits administration depth beyond most payroll-first platforms
HR records, onboarding, and payroll configured as one system
Backed by an established national HR services company
Suits companies whose real problem is enrollment rather than payroll
Cons
No published pricing of any kind on the product page
Circulating price figures are legacy Zenefits rates or third-party estimates
Payroll is part of a configuration rather than a standalone purchase
Solves nothing for a buyer leaving ADP over pricing opacity

What each alternative costs at 10, 25, and 50 employees

The seven platforms that publish a full rate card can be modeled exactly. The table below multiplies each published base fee and per-person rate at three headcounts, which is the comparison a RUN quote is hard to place against until you have it in writing.

Platform10 employees25 employees50 employeesWhat moves the number
Patriot Software$87$162$287$12/mo per extra state
Square Payroll$95$185$335Contractor-only is $6 per person, no base
SurePayroll$99$204$379Multi-state $9.99/mo; year-end forms billed extra
Homebase$99$189$339Plus a paid Homebase plan per location above 10 staff
Gusto Simple$109$199$349Single state only, Plus tier for more
OnPay$109$199$349Multi-state at no extra charge; HR is a $15 + $2 add-on
Justworks Payroll$130$250$450PEO Basic is $79 and PEO Plus $124 per employee
Gusto Plus$200$380$680Multi-state and time tracking included
Monthly software cost at published base plus per-person rates, verified against vendor pricing pages in August 2026. Excludes promotional discounts, benefits premiums, workers compensation, add-on modules, and year-end form fees where billed separately. Rippling, Paychex Flex, and the TriNet HR Platform are omitted because they publish no rates at all. RUN Powered by ADP is omitted for the same reason.

Two patterns are worth naming. The first is that the spread widens with headcount: at 10 employees the published options sit between $87 and $130, a range small enough that price should not decide anything. At 50 the same options run from $287 to $450, and adding Gusto Plus for multi-state coverage pushes the top to $680. The pricing model, not the feature list, produces almost all of that gap.

The second is that per-person fees are often charged per worker paid rather than per person on the roster. Patriot, Square, and the Homebase payroll add-on all bill that way, which means a seasonal business genuinely pays less in a quiet month. That structure matters more than a few dollars of base fee for anyone with a variable headcount, and it is worth confirming in writing when you compare payroll pricing across quotes.

Price the headcount you will have in 18 months
Run the numbers at your current size and at your projected size a year and a half out, then ask two more questions: will anyone be working in a second state, and will anyone need a time clock. Those two answers move the ranking more than the base fee does. A platform that wins at 12 employees in one state can be the most expensive option on the list at 40 across three.

What switching payroll providers actually involves

The move takes a few hours of work and one decision about timing. A quarter boundary is much easier than a mid-quarter move, because payroll tax returns run on a quarterly cycle for Form 941 and an annual cycle for W-2s, so each complete filing period stays with one provider. January 1 is easiest of all, since the new system starts with clean year-to-date totals.

Your new provider will need authority to file and deposit on your behalf, which is done with Form 8655, Reporting Agent Authorization. The provider normally prepares it, but the signature and the responsibility are yours. Deposit schedules follow the IRS lookback rules rather than the provider, so monthly or semiweekly status carries across the move unchanged.

StepWhat to doWhen
Pick the dateTarget a quarter start, ideally January 1Before you sign anything
Export everythingPayroll registers, tax deposit history, employee records, prior filingsBefore you cancel the old account
File the authorizationSign Form 8655 so the new provider can deposit and fileAt implementation
Load year-to-date totalsWages, taxes, and deductions per employee if moving mid-yearBefore the first live run
Confirm state accountsState withholding and unemployment account numbers and ratesBefore the first live run
Run a parallel cycleProcess one pay period in both systems and compare net payOne cycle before go-live
Verify the first depositCheck the deposit posted through your own EFTPS enrollmentAfter the first live run

Do not delete anything on the way out. The FLSA requires employers to keep payroll records for at least three years, and the records that wage computations are based on, including time cards and work schedules, for two (DOL Fact Sheet 21). Access to an old payroll platform usually ends when billing does, so export your payroll records before the final invoice, not after.

How to choose your replacement

Start from the reason you are leaving rather than from the feature grid. Five questions narrow ten options down to two in about ten minutes.

Was the problem the price or the price transparency?
These lead to different answers. If the bill itself was too high, Patriot at $37 plus $5 per worker paid or Square at $35 plus $6 per person will cut it meaningfully. If the problem was that you could never verify what you were paying for, the fix is any vendor with a public rate card, which rules out Rippling, Paychex Flex, and the TriNet HR Platform, all three of which route every request to a quote form.
How many states will you file in next year?
This single answer reorders the whole list. OnPay charges nothing extra for additional states. Gusto Simple covers one state and forces a Plus upgrade for a second. Patriot bills $12 per month per additional state, and SurePayroll charges a flat $9.99 for multi-state regardless of count. A team planning remote hires should price the multi-state scenario first and treat the single-state number as irrelevant.
Is the team hourly or salaried?
An hourly team with rotating shifts needs scheduling and a time clock feeding the pay run, which is what Homebase and Square are built around. A salaried team needs accurate filing and clean records, which is what OnPay and Gusto are built around. Buying the wrong shape means paying for a second subscription and maintaining an integration, and that combined cost usually exceeds whatever the subscription comparison saved you.
Is the real problem benefits rather than payroll?
If the thing that actually hurts is health coverage pricing or enrollment administration, a payroll platform swap will not fix it. A PEO like Justworks changes the economics by pooling your employees into a larger risk group, and the TriNet HR Platform is built around benefits administration. Both are structural decisions with legal and cost implications well beyond a software subscription, so evaluate them as such rather than as cheaper payroll.
What are you signing?
Get the initial term, the renewal behavior, the notice period, and the complete fee schedule in writing before you commit, including year-end form charges, off-cycle run fees, and per-state charges. Several platforms here bill month to month with no term at all, which is worth real money in flexibility. If a vendor will not put the full fee schedule in writing during the sales process, that is information about how the relationship will run afterward.

One last item sits outside the payroll engine. Whichever platform you pick, the new-hire paperwork still has to be collected and kept: the I-9, the W-4, state withholding certificates, and direct deposit authorization. A provider switch is a good moment to check that those files are complete, because that is exactly when gaps in year-end records tend to surface.

Key Takeaways
ADP does not publish RUN pricing. All four packages, Essential Payroll, Enhanced Payroll, Complete Payroll and HR Plus, and HR Pro Payroll and HR, route to a quote form, and the advertised three months free means early invoices do not show the steady-state cost.
Seven of the ten alternatives publish a full rate card. Gusto and OnPay both list $49 per month plus $6 per person, Patriot lists $37 plus $5 per worker paid, and Square lists $35 plus $6 per person paid.
State count reorders the ranking faster than headcount. OnPay charges nothing extra for additional states, Gusto Simple covers one, Patriot bills $12 per month per extra state, and SurePayroll charges a flat $9.99 for multi-state.
Hourly teams should look at Homebase at $39 per month plus $6 per employee paid, or Square Payroll, because scheduling and the time clock feed the pay run instead of sitting in a separate system.
Switching is easiest at a quarter boundary. The new provider needs a signed Form 8655 to file on your behalf, and you remain liable to the IRS for deposits and returns no matter who processes them.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best alternative to ADP RUN for a small business?

For most US small employers, Gusto or OnPay, because both publish a full rate card at $49 per month plus $6 per person and both file federal, state, and local payroll taxes. OnPay charges nothing extra for additional states and gates no payroll feature behind a tier. Gusto splits into Simple, Plus, and Premium, so a second state or built-in time tracking moves you up. If cost is the whole reason, Patriot is cheaper at $37 plus $5 per worker paid.

How much does ADP RUN cost per month?

ADP does not publish it. All four RUN packages route to a Get Pricing form or a phone number, so any specific figure you find elsewhere is a third-party estimate or somebody else's negotiated deal. ADP also advertises three months free for new small business customers, which means early invoices understate the steady-state cost. Ask for a written quote covering the package, every add-on, year-end form fees, and the price after the promotion ends.

Is Gusto cheaper than ADP RUN?

Only one of the two publishes rates, so the honest answer is that it depends on your quote. Gusto lists Simple at $49 plus $6 per person, Plus at $80 plus $12, and Premium at $180 plus $22. A 25-person team on Simple pays $199 a month and can verify that before speaking to anyone. Put your ADP quote next to $199, or next to $380 if you need multi-state payroll on Plus.

What is the cheapest alternative to ADP RUN?

Patriot Software, at $37 per month plus $5 per worker paid, which is $87 at 10 employees and $287 at 50. Its Basic plan is $17 plus $4 but does not file your taxes. For a contractor-only payroll, Square is cheaper still at $6 per person with no base fee. Watch the surcharges: Patriot bills $12 per month per additional state, and SurePayroll bills $9.99 for multi-state.

Can I switch payroll providers in the middle of the year?

Yes, though a quarter boundary is far less work. Form 941 runs quarterly and W-2s run annually, so moving at a period start keeps each complete filing with one provider. A mid-quarter move means loading year-to-date wage and tax totals into the new system and agreeing in writing who files the current quarter. Export registers, deposit history, and employee records before you cancel, since access usually ends with billing.

Does ADP RUN require a contract?

ADP does not publish contract terms next to its packages, so the service agreement is the only reliable source. Before signing with any provider, get the initial term, the renewal behavior, the notice period, and the full fee schedule in writing. Several alternatives here bill month to month with no term at all, which is worth real money in flexibility if you are unsure whether the fit will last.

What do I lose by leaving ADP RUN?

Mostly scale and breadth: filing coverage in every US jurisdiction, 24/7 support on RUN packages, and the option to buy benefits, retirement, and workers compensation from the same vendor. You also lose your historical data unless you export it first. What you usually gain is a price you can read and month-to-month billing. If breadth is what you value, Paychex Flex is the closest like-for-like replacement and it quotes the same way ADP does.

Which ADP RUN alternative is best for hourly and shift-based teams?

Homebase or Square Payroll. Homebase is a scheduling and time clock product with payroll attached at $39 per month plus $6 per employee paid, so hours feed the pay run without a second subscription. Square Payroll is $35 plus $6 per person paid and fits a business already taking payments through Square. For food service specifically, compare both against dedicated restaurant payroll services before deciding.

Ready to transform your onboarding?

7-day free trial No credit card required
Start Your Free Trial