FirstHR

Payroll for Law Firms: 8 Options Compared

Payroll for law firms compared on partner K-1 handling, trust account separation, and multi-state filing, plus what payroll does not cover at hiring.

Nick Anisimov

Nick Anisimov

FirstHR Founder

Payroll•
•
16 min

Payroll for Law Firms Compared

Why partners never run through payroll, what trust account separation actually requires, and which of eight options fit a small or growing firm

A law firm with fifteen people can be paying five different ways at once. I build HR software for small businesses, and if another founder asked me about paying a firm like that, I would say the hard part is not the software but the rules around it, which come from tax law and bar ethics.

This comparison covers what actually differs about paying a law firm, which of eight options fit a small or growing firm, and the part of hiring an attorney that no payroll platform touches.

At a firm that size, equity partners take draws against profit and receive a K-1. Associates get salary and a bonus on a W-2. A contract attorney invoices on a 1099. Paralegals are hourly with overtime. And somewhere in the background sits a trust account holding client money that must never come near any of it.

That mix makes the search for law firm payroll frustrating. Practice management platforms such as Clio and MyCase do not run payroll, and there is no meaningful category of law-firm-native payroll software. You buy general small business payroll plus separate legal accounting tools for the trust side. Several of those payroll vendors keep law firm pages on partner pay and mixed W-2 and 1099 teams.

TL;DR
Partners in a partnership take guaranteed payments and draws on Schedule K-1, not W-2 wages, and owe 15.3 percent self-employment tax. Client trust money can never fund payroll. Law-firm-native payroll barely exists, so you are buying general payroll: Gusto and OnPay publish pricing at $49 plus $6 per employee, SurePayroll suits solos, and quote-only ADP and Paychex fit multi-state firms.

What makes law firm payroll different

Three things set law firm payroll apart: the mix of tax treatments, the client trust account, and multi-state practice. None of them requires legal-specific software, but all three change how ordinary software has to be configured.

RoleHow they are paidTax formWho pays employment taxPayroll treatment
Equity partnerGuaranteed payments and drawsSchedule K-1Self-employment tax paid by the partnerNever through payroll
Income partnerSalary, sometimes plus bonusW-2 in many firmsEmployer withholds and matches FICAThrough payroll, structure varies
Associate attorneySalary plus bonusW-2Employer withholds and matches FICAThrough payroll
Of counselSalary or contract feeW-2 or 1099Depends on the working relationshipDepends on classification
Contract attorneyHourly or per-matter fee1099 typicallyContractor pays own self-employment taxContractor payment, not payroll
Paralegal and supportHourly or salary plus overtimeW-2Employer withholds and matches FICAThrough payroll
General treatment for a firm organized as a partnership. Structure varies with entity type: a professional corporation or an S corporation election changes how owner compensation is handled, and income partner treatment differs between firms. This is a starting framework rather than tax advice; confirm your firm's structure with your accountant before configuring payroll.

The first is the sheer number of tax treatments running simultaneously. A firm of fifteen may have partners on K-1, associates and staff on W-2, and contract attorneys on 1099, which means the payroll system has to accommodate people who are deliberately outside the payroll run alongside those inside it.

The second is the trust account, covered below. The third is multi-state practice. Attorneys licensed and practicing across state lines are common even at small firms, while a comparable non-legal business of that size would still be single-state. Each additional state means registration for withholding and unemployment before anyone is paid there.

Why partners never run through payroll

A partnership cannot pay W-2 wages to its own partners: the Internal Revenue Service says partners are not employees and should not be issued a Form W-2, and a general partner's earnings from the firm count as self-employment income. This is the point that most surprises people arriving from a corporate background, and it is not a matter of firm preference.

Payment typeWhat it isTax treatment
Guaranteed paymentFixed compensation for services, paid regardless of firm profitOrdinary income on K-1, subject to self-employment tax
DrawWithdrawal against the partner's share of profitsDistribution, reduces capital account rather than being separate income
Distributive shareThe partner's allocated portion of firm incomeReported on K-1, general partners owe self-employment tax

Guaranteed payments for services are subject to self-employment tax, including for limited partners, who avoid it on their distributive share under 26 U.S.C. 1402(a)(13). The rate is 15.3 percent, made up of 12.4 percent Social Security on earnings up to the annual wage base of $184,500 for 2026 plus 2.9 percent Medicare with no cap.

An additional 0.9 percent Medicare tax applies above $200,000 for single filers and $250,000 for joint filers. Self-employment tax is calculated on 92.35 percent of net earnings, and half of it is deductible, per IRS Topic 554.

Guaranteed payments do not go through the payroll run
The practical rule is simple and frequently broken by firms setting up payroll for the first time: partner compensation is paid outside the payroll system, and the partner handles the tax through quarterly estimated payments rather than through withholding. Running a partner through payroll as though they were an employee creates a W-2 that should not exist and employer FICA that the firm should not be paying. If a payroll platform is configured with a partner as a salaried employee, that is a setup error worth catching before the first quarter closes.

Income partners, sometimes called non-equity partners, are a different case. Many firms treat them as employees receiving a W-2, since they hold the partner title without an equity stake. The treatment varies between firms and depends on the partnership agreement, which is one of the reasons the payroll setup conversation should involve the firm accountant rather than only the office manager.

Still Using Spreadsheets for Onboarding?
Automate documents, training assignments, task management, and track onboarding progress in real time.
See How It Works

Trust account separation is an ethics rule, not an accounting preference

Client funds held in an Interest on Lawyers Trust Account (IOLTA) belong to the client, not to the firm. Under the American Bar Association's Model Rule 1.15 and the state equivalents that nearly all jurisdictions have adopted, those funds must be kept entirely separate from the firm's own property.

Paying operating expenses, payroll included, out of the trust account breaks that rule in two ways. Firm money left in trust is commingling (mixing firm and client funds), and client money spent on firm bills is misappropriation. The consequences for attorney misconduct range from reprimand through suspension to disbarment.

The rule bites even where the mistake was unintentional and no client ultimately lost money. California's Handbook on Client Trust Accounting, for one, holds a lawyer responsible for mishandled funds regardless of intent or the absence of injury to anyone.

What this means for payroll configuration specifically
Payroll is funded from the operating account and only the operating account. When setting up a payroll platform, connect the operating account and do not add the trust account to the banking configuration at all, even as a secondary or backup funding source. The failure mode is not usually a deliberate raid on client funds; it is an automated system drawing from whichever account has a balance when the operating account runs short. Removing the trust account from the platform entirely eliminates that possibility.

Trust accounts also carry reconciliation duties. California, for example, requires a written monthly three-way reconciliation that balances the trust account journal against the individual client ledgers and the bank statement. That is trust accounting work for legal accounting tools, not for payroll software. On top of that, California's State Bar now requires annual trust account registration and a compliance certification.

8 payroll options for law firms compared

The table compares seven payroll providers plus one adjacent tool. The Runs Payroll column is there because the tool in the first row does not run payroll, and that distinction matters more than any feature comparison below it.

ProviderBest ForStarting PriceRuns PayrollPartner K-1 HandlingMulti-State FilingOnboarding WorkflowsTrial
FirstHRAttorney and staff onboarding only$98-$198 flatFree trial
GustoFirms wanting published pricing$49 + $6/eeUntil 1st run
OnPayMulti-state firms on one plan$49 + $6/ee1 month
SurePayrollSolo and very small practices$29 + $7/eeVaries
PaychexGrowing firms wanting an advisorQuoteVaries
ADP RUNMulti-office and multi-state depthQuoteVaries
JustworksBenefits buying power through a PEO$50 + $8/eeDemo
RipplingFirms wiring payroll to HR and IT$40 + $8/userDemo
Pricing as published on each vendor's own site, checked October 2026. Paychex and ADP publish no list pricing, so those rows show Quote. Rippling's pricing page is a quote form; its figure is the starting price on Rippling's small-business page, which starts payroll plans at $8 per user per month plus a $40 monthly base fee. Rippling's blog prices the core platform and the payroll module at $8 per employee each (payroll billed annually), so configured quotes can run higher. Partner K-1 Handling means the platform lets partners stay outside the W-2 payroll run, with draws and guaranteed payments paid outside it; the K-1 itself comes from the partnership return, not from payroll. Multi-State Filing marks support at any price: Gusto needs its Plus plan, and SurePayroll charges a flat $9.99 a month. Onboarding Workflows marks employee onboarding in the vendor's own product; on Paychex it is an add-on to the Basic package. FirstHR is our product, listed first as the onboarding layer that sits beside a payroll provider: it does not run payroll and covers only the onboarding column. We list its gaps the same way we do for every other tool.

A note on the first row: FirstHR is our product. It heads the table as the onboarding layer that sits beside a payroll provider, and we have marked its gaps in the same columns we use for everyone else.

Payroll, partner compensation, and tax filing come from the seven providers below, and the full FirstHR review sits in the section on what payroll does not cover at hiring.

Gusto

Gusto pairs published pricing with onboarding built into the same account. The Simple plan costs $49 per month plus $6 per employee, after a base increase during 2025. Its law firm page describes support for lockstep and Cravath-scale associate salaries, with scale levels set from first-year associates through Of Counsel and administrative staff.

The catch for firms is that Simple covers single-state payroll only. Given how often attorneys are licensed across state lines, model the Plus tier at $80 plus $12 per employee if a second state is plausible.

Pros
Published pricing with month-to-month billing and no long-term contract
Law firm page covers lockstep and Cravath-scale associate pay
Strong benefits administration for firms offering health coverage
Contractor payments handled alongside W-2 payroll for contract attorneys
Cons
Simple plan is single-state only, which multi-jurisdiction firms outgrow
Base price rose from $40 to $49 during 2025
No trust accounting: that requires a separate legal accounting tool
Per-employee fees compound as the firm grows

OnPay

OnPay has one payroll plan at $49 per month plus $6 per employee, with no tier to climb. Tax filing covers all 50 states with no multi-state surcharge, which is the specific reason to prefer it over Gusto for a firm with attorneys practicing across state lines.

HR tools and time tracking are paid add-ons. OnPay maintains a law firm page addressing equity and non-equity partners, contract attorneys, and trust account separation.

Pros
Multi-state filing at no surcharge
Single payroll plan with no tiers to climb
Documented approach to partner and contract attorney payment
Year-end W-2 and 1099 filing included in the base price
Cons
HR tools beyond onboarding paperwork are a $15 plus $2 per worker add-on
Time tracking for hourly support staff is a $15 plus $4 per worker add-on
Live HR support is a separate $65-a-month add-on
Interface is functional rather than polished

SurePayroll

SurePayroll is Paychex's payroll for very small employers, at $29 per month plus $7 per employee. Its law firm page covers owner draws, partner distributions, and associate salaries alongside W-2 and 1099 workers. For a solo practitioner with an assistant or a two-attorney practice, it is the cheapest credible option, and the feature depth of the larger platforms is not needed.

Pros
Lowest monthly base fee among the providers here
Law firm page covers owner draws, distributions, and salaries
Flat $9.99 monthly multi-state fee rather than per-state pricing
Unlimited payroll runs on all plans
Cons
Its $7 per-employee fee tops Gusto Simple and OnPay
Thin HR functionality and no onboarding workflows
Outgrown quickly by a firm adding associates
Interface reads dated compared to newer platforms

Paychex

With Paychex you buy a service relationship rather than a software subscription, with a payroll specialist included on the Complete package and a professional employer organization (PEO) option for firms that want more buying power on benefits. Pricing is quote-only.

Paychex also runs a partner program for American Bar Association members, with its own sign-up page for the association, so a member firm should ask for those terms before comparing quotes.

Pros
Partner program for American Bar Association members
A payroll specialist is included on the Complete package
Professional employer organization path to more buying power on benefits
Handles multi-state registrations and filings
Cons
Quote-only pricing with no published rates at any tier
Garnishment payment services are an add-on on the Basic package
Dedicated support requires the Complete package or a paid add-on
Ending service requires 30 days of notice

ADP RUN

Every RUN package calculates, files, deposits, and reconciles payroll taxes, and ADP pays the resulting fines if it makes a filing error. Multi-state payroll is included in all four packages, and for a firm with offices in several states or attorneys admitted in multiple jurisdictions, that is the concrete argument for ADP.

ADP publishes no rates; every package is quoted. There is no law-firm-specific landing page, so the industry framing comes from general professional services.

Pros
Multi-state payroll and tax filing included in all four packages
Scales from small firm to large without changing vendors
Deep benefits and retirement administration
Runs free-month promotions for new clients with 1 to 49 employees
Cons
No published pricing: every package is quoted
No law-firm-specific product framing or documentation
W-2 and 1099 forms carry an additional fee
Electronic Form I-9 starts on the Enhanced package, not Essential

Justworks

Justworks is two products under one name. Payroll at $50 per month plus $8 per employee is straightforward software.

The professional employer organization tier is a co-employment arrangement giving a small firm access to benefit plans priced off a much larger risk pool. That pooling is the main reason to consider it: a fifteen-person firm cannot negotiate health coverage the way a large group can.

Pros
PEO pooling gives small firms access to larger-group benefits pricing
Published per-employee pricing, unusual among PEOs
Multi-state payroll and filings included
Support included at every tier
Cons
PEO pricing is far above standalone payroll software
Co-employment is a structural change rather than a software swap
Health premiums and workers compensation are separate pass-through costs
More arrangement than a firm wanting only payroll needs

Rippling

Rippling is built on a unified employee record where payroll, HR, and device provisioning share one data model. The IT provisioning is more relevant to a law firm than to most industries, given document management systems and the security requirements around client confidentiality.

Rippling's pricing page lists no rates. Its small-business page starts payroll plans at a $40 monthly base fee plus $8 per user. Its blog prices the core platform at $8 per employee and domestic payroll at another $8 on annual billing, so a configured quote can land above that starting figure.

Pros
Device and application provisioning genuinely relevant to firm security
Single employee record across payroll, HR, and IT
Handles state tax registration, withholding, and filing across all 50 states
Scales without replatforming as the firm grows
Cons
Modular pricing: benefits, time and attendance or IT products add to the $8 per user start
The pricing page is a quote form, so starting rates come from the Rippling small-business page and blog
Each product is bought separately on top of the required core platform
Overbuilt for a small firm
Companies Using FirstHR Onboard 3x Faster
Join hundreds of small businesses who transformed their new hire experience.
See It in Action

Where practice management tools fit, and why they skip payroll

Practice management tools fit beside payroll, not in place of it. Firms often start this search assuming the platform they already use will handle payroll, but none of the six below runs payroll itself. Each centers on legal-specific work, whether practice management, billing, or trust accounting, while payroll needs no legal-specific software.

PlatformWhat it doesPayroll?
ClioPractice management, billing, trust accountingNo payroll in its feature list
MyCasePractice management and billingNo payroll
PracticePantherAll-in-one practice management and workflowNo payroll processing; its accounting add-on books payroll spend
CosmoLexPractice management with built-in trust accountingThrough partner bookkeeping services rather than natively
LeanLawLegal billing inside QuickBooks OnlineNone of its own; it syncs with QuickBooks Online
TrustBooksTrust accounting software for small firmsNo payroll

These platforms handle the trust side, which is the genuinely legal-specific accounting problem, and leave payroll to a separate provider. That means the stack for a typical small firm is practice management plus trust accounting plus a general payroll provider rather than one system doing everything.

What payroll does not cover when you hire an attorney

None of the providers above handles the law-firm-specific checks that have to happen before the first payroll run. Each pays people correctly once they are set up, and most include basic onboarding for tax forms and direct deposit, but in a law firm the list of what comes before that first run is longer than in most industries.

Task at hireWhy it mattersWhere it usually lives
Bar admission verificationConfirming licensure in each practicing jurisdictionManual check, often unrecorded
Conflict of interest checkRequired before the attorney touches mattersConflicts system, certification often on paper
Employment and confidentiality agreementsSigned before start, retained for the relationshipEmail attachments or a shared drive
Ethics and malpractice acknowledgmentFirm policy acknowledgment on recordHandbook signature page, if collected
I-9 and W-4Federal requirement with a three-day I-9 deadlinePayroll platform sometimes, paper often
Specialty certificationsPrivacy, tax, or other credentials where relevantRarely tracked systematically

The pattern in that right-hand column is the point. Payroll platforms calculate and pay, and their onboarding covers tax forms, but bar admission checks and conflict checks happen outside them. Form I-9 handling varies by plan, but the deadline does not: an I-9 is due within three business days of the start date.

In a small firm, the hiring tasks in that table land on the office manager alongside everything else, and they are the part that gets discovered incomplete during an audit or a malpractice carrier review rather than at the time.

Where FirstHR fits, and what it does not do
FirstHR gives the tasks in that table one place to live: onboarding workflows with a dated task for each check, e-signature on offer letters and policy acknowledgments, document collection with retention, training built from your own ethics and policy material with completion recorded by signature, and employee records for small US firms, at $98 a month for up to 10 people or $198 for 11 to 50. Payroll, partner draws, and payroll taxes stay with one of the providers above; we sit alongside your payroll provider rather than replacing it.
Pros
Onboarding workflows with dated tasks for each new attorney and staff hire
E-signature on offer letters and policy acknowledgments
Documents stored with an expiry date and a valid or expired status
Training built from your own policy files, with completion recorded by signature
Cons
Payroll, partner pay, and payroll tax filing stay with a provider above
Conflict checks and bar admission lookups run in firm systems
Sends no deadline reminders, so dates live on tasks the team checks
Trust accounting stays with a legal accounting tool

How to choose payroll for a law firm

Choosing payroll for a law firm comes down to the five questions below, and each one is about your own firm rather than about the software.

How many states do your attorneys practice in?
This is the first question because it eliminates options rather than ranking them. Gusto Simple does not support a second state and forces the Plus tier at $80 plus $12 per employee. OnPay includes multi-state filing at its single price. If every attorney practices in one state, that difference does not exist and Gusto competes on HR depth instead. Multi-jurisdiction admission is common enough at small firm sizes that this should be settled before comparing anything else.
How are your partners actually structured?
Ask the firm accountant rather than assuming. Equity partners in a partnership take guaranteed payments and draws on a K-1 and stay out of the payroll run entirely. Income partners may be W-2 employees depending on the partnership agreement. A firm organized as a professional corporation or making an S corporation election has different owner compensation mechanics altogether. Configure the payroll platform to match the actual structure, and never add a K-1 partner as a salaried employee for convenience.
Which account will fund payroll?
The operating account, and the trust account should not appear in the platform at all. This sounds obvious and is worth doing deliberately: connect only the operating account during setup and decline any prompt to add a secondary funding source. An automated draw cannot reach an account the system was never given.
Are you a bar association member?
If so, ask Paychex about its ABA partner program, which has a dedicated sign-up page, and check whether your state or local bar runs vendor programs of its own. Membership does not automatically make Paychex the right answer, since it publishes no rates to compare against the published platforms, but a member firm should get the association quote before comparing rather than after.
What happens to bonuses and off-cycle payments?
Attorney compensation frequently includes origination bonuses, performance bonuses, and year-end distributions paid outside the regular cycle. Equity partner distributions stay outside payroll, but the bonuses need off-cycle runs: confirm the provider supports them without a per-run fee, since a firm paying quarterly origination bonuses to five attorneys will use that capability regularly. Also confirm how supplemental wages are withheld, since the flat supplemental rate and the aggregate method, which withholds on the bonus and regular pay together, produce materially different take-home on a large bonus.
Key Takeaways
Partners in a partnership cannot receive W-2 wages from their own firm; guaranteed payments and draws are reported on Schedule K-1. Guaranteed payments and the profit share of a general partner carry self-employment tax at 15.3 percent (the Social Security portion only up to $184,500 for 2026), which partners pay through quarterly estimated payments rather than withholding.
Trust account funds can never pay operating expenses, payroll included. Under ABA Model Rule 1.15 and its state versions this is misappropriation of client funds, with consequences up to disbarment, even where the error was unintentional. Connect only the operating account to the payroll platform.
There is no meaningful category of law-firm-native payroll software. Clio, MyCase, and PracticePanther do not run payroll, so this is a general payroll purchase plus separate trust accounting.
Multi-state practice is the factor that most often decides the software. Gusto Simple does not support a second state and forces an upgrade; OnPay includes multi-state filing at one price. Settle this before comparing anything else.
Bar verification and conflict checks happen before the first paycheck and sit outside every payroll platform, and signed agreements and ethics acknowledgments often do too. In small firms that work lands on the office manager and is what gets found incomplete later.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can law firm partners be paid through payroll?

Not in a partnership. Partners cannot receive W-2 wages from the firm they own; they take guaranteed payments and draws reported on Schedule K-1 instead. Guaranteed payments and a general partner's profit share carry self-employment tax at 15.3 percent, with the Social Security portion applying up to $184,500 for 2026. Income or non-equity partners are often treated as W-2 employees, depending on the partnership agreement.

What makes law firm payroll different from other small business payroll?

Several tax treatments run simultaneously, with partners on K-1, staff on W-2, and contract attorneys on 1099. Client funds in trust must never touch payroll. And multi-state practice is common at firm sizes where a comparable business would still be single-state.

Can a law firm pay payroll from its IOLTA trust account?

No. Under ABA Model Rule 1.15 and state equivalents, client funds must be kept entirely separate from firm property, and using them for operating expenses is misappropriation, with consequences up to disbarment. Payroll is funded from the operating account, and the trust account should not be connected to the payroll platform at all.

Is there payroll software built specifically for law firms?

Not really. Clio, MyCase, and PracticePanther do not run payroll. The market offers general small business payroll, with law firm pages from several of its vendors, plus separate trust accounting tools such as CosmoLex, LeanLaw, and TrustBooks.

How do law firms handle contract attorneys in payroll?

Usually as independent contractors paid on a 1099 rather than through the W-2 run, though classification depends on the actual working relationship rather than the engagement letter.

What should a law firm look for in payroll software?

Support for paying partners outside the W-2 run, multi-state filing if attorneys practice across state lines, clean banking separation so the trust account is never connected, and off-cycle runs for bonuses without a per-run fee. Legal-specific features beyond that rarely decide it for a small firm.

How much does payroll for a law firm cost?

A 10-person firm runs roughly $99 to $130 monthly on published pricing: $109 on Gusto or OnPay, $99 on SurePayroll, $130 on Justworks payroll. Paychex and ADP quote every package.

What does payroll software not cover when hiring an attorney?

Payroll software does not cover bar admission verification or conflict of interest checks. Signed employment and confidentiality agreements and ethics and malpractice acknowledgments often fall outside it too, and on payroll plans without onboarding, so do the I-9 and W-4.

Make HR the easy part of running your business

Onboarding, e-signatures, training and core HR in one place. Up and running in 5 minutes.

  • 7-day free trial
  • No credit card required
  • Cancel anytime
4.7 on G2300+ companies trust FirstHR