Employee Benefits Broker: 12 Brokerages Compared

I build HR software for small businesses, and the question I would always put to a benefits broker is how it gets paid. This page starts there, compares twelve brokerages across three different service models, and prices every route at 15 and 50 employees against the premium it sits inside.

How a broker is paid comes first because, on a small group health plan, the commission is set by the insurance carrier and built into the premium, and it is very often paid whether or not you appoint a broker at all. If you are buying group coverage and have not named someone, you are most likely paying for representation you are not receiving.

Almost every page ranking for this search is published by a firm that sells brokerage. That does not make those pages wrong, but it means two things go unsaid: the commission point above, and scale honesty. The biggest names in this category are genuine leaders of the industry and will not meaningfully compete for a twenty-person account.

Meanwhile the firms that will happily take that account rarely surface alongside them, because they are local offices of national networks rather than national marketing departments. This page also answers the question the rest of the category avoids: whether a company your size needs a broker yet, and what to do instead if it does not.

What an employee benefits broker actually does

Four core jobs, and the fourth is the one that separates a good broker from a name on a policy. A broker shops carriers, designs what the plan covers and what employees pay, runs the mechanics of enrollment, and then argues on your behalf at renewal when the carrier proposes an increase.

The naming variants do not map to different services. Singular or plural, the words describe the same firms, and adding insurance or medical to the front narrows the emphasis to group health rather than the full benefits package. The one term that behaves differently is benefits consultant, which more often implies a fee-based advisory relationship, though many firms use both words for the same work.

Whatever the label, the work breaks down the same way: the four core jobs plus compliance documentation, such as Affordable Care Act (ACA) reporting support, and advocacy for employees whose claims or bills go wrong.

How brokers are paid, and why it decides more than the brand

Understand this before comparing any firm. Broker compensation on a small fully insured group is set by the insurance carrier and embedded in the premium, not invoiced to you, and it is generally the same amount whichever broker holds the account. Fully insured simply means you buy the coverage from a carrier, which then pays the claims.

The federal small business marketplace backs up the part that matters to your budget. HealthCare.gov tells employers that in general they will not pay more if they use an agent or broker, which is the plain-language version of a commission that already sits inside the rate.

Commission on group medical is paid either as a percentage of premium, which varies by carrier, product, and group size, or as a flat amount per employee per month (PEPM), which carriers frequently use on small groups. Ancillary lines such as dental, vision, and voluntary products often carry higher percentages against much smaller premiums.

Fee-based arrangements, where you pay the broker directly and commissions are stripped from the rate, exist but concentrate among larger employers and self-funded ones, which pay their own claims instead of buying a fully insured plan.

There is a legal backstop worth knowing. Section 202 of Division BB of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, covers brokers and consultants who reasonably expect $1,000 or more in direct or indirect compensation from an ERISA group health plan, meaning a plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.

Those brokers and consultants must disclose that compensation in writing to the responsible plan fiduciary, which is normally you, before the arrangement is entered into, extended, or renewed. The Department of Labor set out its enforcement approach in a field assistance bulletin. If you have never received such a disclosure, ask for it. The request is routine and the answer is informative.

12 employee benefits brokerages at a glance

The twelve brokerages below are ordered by relevance to a small employer, not by size or quality. The firms at the bottom are among the largest and most capable in the world and are the least likely to quote a company of thirty.

How we evaluated these brokerages

Service descriptions in this category are close to identical, because every firm shops carriers and supports enrollment. The useful tests are about access, delivery model, and whether compensation is disclosed without being asked.

Everyone in one list, with who they report to

Position, department, type, manager and status for each person. People who have left move to a separate list.

Start free trialSee how core HR works

My TeamManage your team members and their information#EmployeeDepartmentTypeStatus1Dwight SchruteAssistant to the Regional ManagerDepartmentSalesTypeFull-timeStatusActive2Jim HalpertSales RepresentativeDepartmentSalesTypeFull-timeStatusOn Leave3Ryan HowardSales AssociateDepartmentSalesTypeTemporaryStatusActive4Darryl PhilbinWarehouse ForemanDepartmentWarehouseTypeFull-timeStatusActive

Tech-enabled brokerages

Two firms that rebuilt the brokerage around software rather than adding software to a brokerage. Both are paid through the same commission or fee arrangements as everyone else; the difference is delivery.

Nava's published customer stories come from employers of roughly 50 to 1,000 employees, and the product reflects that: a command center for HR with renewal planning and document management on one side, and a member app for employees on the other. Its advisers describe experience with self-funding, pharmacy benefit arrangements, and captive structures (insurers owned by the employers they cover), which is unusual capability to find pointed at the lower mid-market.

That customer base is the honest limitation for readers of this page. A fifteen-person company sits below it, and the platform depth that justifies the model assumes someone on your side to use it. Figures the company reports about administrative hours saved and satisfaction scores are self-reported and not independently audited, so hold them lightly in any sales conversation.

This is the firm on the list that most directly addresses a company without an HR department. Its own FAQ puts the sweet spot for an independent broker at 25 to 500 employees, and it frames its work around founders and company builders rather than HR teams.

Ignition's packaging reflects that focus, with defined steps rather than an open-ended consulting relationship. It says most companies get carrier quotes within 48 hours of submitting census data, the employee list carriers price from, and implementation typically takes 30 to 45 days. Offering to disclose its commission structure in full is genuinely uncommon in a category where the number is invisible inside the premium.

It is also the smallest firm here by a wide margin, which cuts both ways. Carrier leverage at scale, multi-state depth, and the ability to absorb a complex claims escalation all favor the larger networks. Savings percentages the firm cites are its own reported figures rather than independently verified results, and the service runs through its platform and licensed advisers rather than a branch network.

National firms that serve small groups through local offices

Five brokerages that combine national scale with branch offices, which is how most small US employers actually end up with a broker. The account sits with a local team rather than with the brand.

The structural advantage is reach: a dense office network across North America means there is usually a HUB team within driving distance that already knows the carriers in your state.

HUB also writes commercial property and casualty, so a small business can hold one relationship for both its benefits and its business insurance. That removes a coordination problem founders underestimate until they have two brokers giving conflicting advice.

The trade of a decentralized model is that your experience depends heavily on which office and which adviser you get, so the quality of the local team matters more than the brand. Nothing is published on price, the firm has grown substantially through acquisition, and the analytics capability marketed nationally is not evenly available at every branch.

Decentralization is the stated operating model rather than an accident of growth, and for a small employer that has a real consequence: the local team generally has authority to make decisions about your account without escalating. Ask how that office handles employee communication and adoption support during plan rollout, which is the part of a benefits change that most often goes wrong at companies without an HR function.

The same decentralization means the brand tells you less about what you will get than the office does. As a public company it carries the earnings pressure that comes with a stock listing, nothing is published on compensation or scope, and its national benefits capability is less concentrated than at the consultancy-model firms further down this list.

Two things make this firm relevant to a smaller employer. It publishes content aimed squarely at small business benefits decisions rather than at enterprise HR, and it bundles benefit plan administration and HR services with the brokerage, so the ongoing work of running enrollment and records can sit with the same firm that placed the plan. Employee ownership also removes the quarterly earnings pressure that shapes behavior at the public brokers.

Its footprint is more concentrated than the largest national networks, so depth varies by region and it is strongest where it has grown. Nothing is published on price, the acquisition pace has been steady enough that the firm you meet may have joined recently, and its global capability runs through a partner network rather than owned offices.

Vertical specialization is the differentiator. Where a firm has built a practice around your industry, the benchmarking is against companies with your risk profile rather than against a national average, and that changes plan design in ways a generalist cannot match.

Alliant has been adding health and benefits capability by acquisition, most visibly its August 2026 agreement to buy Nava Benefits, which would bring Nava's software platform and its team inside a national structure.

The center of gravity is mid-market and above, so a fifteen-person company is below where the model pays off. Nothing is published, engagement runs through a sales process, and outside the specialty verticals the offer is closer to that of the other large national brokers than the positioning suggests.

The firm has built its benefits reputation on applying a structured analytical process to plan design rather than on relationship alone, through a proprietary planning platform it calls USI ONE. For an employer at a few hundred employees whose claims experience actually drives its renewal, that analytical approach is where the money is.

Below the mid-market it is largely wasted. A small fully insured group is community rated, meaning its own claims history does not set its price, and its plan design levers are limited by what the carrier offers. Nothing is published on compensation, the evaluation runs through a sales cycle, and the firm has grown substantially by acquisition, so local capability is uneven.

Middle-market and global consultancies

Five firms that lead the industry and are included so you can recognize them and calibrate your expectations. All five are excellent at what they do. Very little of it is aimed at a company of thirty.

The distinguishing capability is coordination across disciplines. Medical, pharmacy, compliance, and commercial risk sit with one account team backed by the resources of the largest broker group in the world, which is worth real money when a plan change touches several of those at once. The firm publishes clear guidance on the mechanics of changing brokers, including the point that a mid-term switch usually costs the employer nothing.

Middle market means what it says. Nothing is published, engagement is through a sales process, and the coordination advantage assumes you have enough moving parts to coordinate. A single-state company with one health plan and no commercial risk to speak of is buying an organizational structure it will not use.

Gallagher is the largest firm on this list that genuinely serves the whole size range, from local businesses to multinationals. The industry teams are the reason to consider it: benchmarking and plan design informed by employers with the same workforce profile beats a national average, and the office network means someone is usually local.

The full service suite is built around larger and more complex organizations, which means a small employer receives a subset of it. Nothing is published, evaluation runs through a sales process, and the breadth that justifies the firm at scale is overhead below it.

Private ownership is the substantive difference rather than a talking point. Without public shareholders the firm answers to a longer time horizon, which is often reflected in account team continuity, and continuity matters in benefits because the value compounds across renewal cycles with someone who knows your claims history.

The service model assumes complexity worth coordinating: multiple carriers, third-party administrators, and lines of coverage under one strategy. A small fully insured group has none of that. Nothing is published, engagement is through a sales process, and the firm is not positioned for small business.

Aon

Global professional services firm with an actuarial benefits practice

Compensation

Commission or negotiated fee, quoted per engagement. Reported about $17.2 billion in revenue for 2025, and agreed in August 2026 to acquire USI

Covers

Benefits brokering and consulting, actuarial analytics and predictive cost modeling, pharmacy benefit advisory, and cross-border benefits programs across 120 or more countries

Best for

Large employers, particularly those operating across borders

Analytical depth is the argument. Aon states it applies roughly $650 billion in claims data to advise on carrier discounts, network coverage, and provider access, and its health practice publishes the cost projections the rest of the industry plans against. For a self-insured employer spending millions, actuarial rigor of that kind pays for the relationship many times over.

None of it is reachable or useful at small scale. A community-rated group of thirty has no claims experience to model and no negotiating leverage to apply the analysis to. Cross-border capability, a major part of the value proposition, is pure cost for a US-only employer, and nothing is published at any tier.

Marsh People and Investments sits closer to consultancy than to brokerage, and the benchmarking is the product. Its annual national survey of employer-sponsored health plans, drawn from well over a thousand employers, is the reference point most of the industry uses to know whether a renewal is reasonable. If your benefits spend is large enough that a percentage point of plan design is real money, that analysis is worth paying for directly.

For a small employer it is the wrong shape entirely. There is no day-to-day small group service model here, the engagement assumes an internal benefits team to receive the work, and nothing is published. It belongs on a list like this because of its scale and authority, not because it is available to you.

Org chart

Michael ScottRegional Manager3 departments

Dwight SchruteSalesReports to Michael

Darryl PhilbinWarehouseReports to Michael

My Team

Ryan HowardSales AssociateActive

Kelly KapoorCustomer ServiceActive

Jim HalpertSales RepresentativeOn Leave

Departments

Dwight SchruteSales3 people

Darryl PhilbinWarehouse1 person

Kelly KapoorCustomer Service1 person

Core HR

Who works here and who does what

Profiles, departments and an org chart, with every change kept on record.

Start free trial

What each route costs at 15 and 50 employees

A broker on commission adds no separate invoice at either headcount, and every other route costs far less than the insurance it sits beside. That is why the premium belongs in the same table: at both headcounts it runs about six times the fee for a professional employer organization (PEO) and more than eighty times the software subscription.

Two points stand out. The first is that broker commission at small scale is not a lever you control: the carrier sets it, it is inside the premium, and shopping brokers on price is largely a category error.

The second point is where your attention belongs: plan design and carrier selection, not the fee structure of your adviser. At 50 employees, two percentage points off a renewal is worth roughly $9,300 a year at the KFF average single premium, which is the scale of money a good broker is there to move.

Employee benefits companies, and which one you are actually hiring

Employee benefits company is a loose phrase for four different businesses that sell different things. Knowing which one is on the other end of a first sales call settles most of the confusion about who is responsible for what.

Provider is the word that causes the most trouble. In phrases like group benefits providers or your benefits provider, it usually means the carrier that issues the coverage and pays the claims, not the firm that sold it to you, although plenty of brokerages use the term about themselves. Your contract for the coverage sits with the carrier either way, which is why changing your benefits administration vendor does not change your plan.

What a group benefits plan is

A group benefits plan is one insurance contract an employer buys to cover a defined group of its employees, and usually their dependents, instead of a set of individual policies. Medical is the core of it, with dental, vision, life, and disability commonly added as separate lines under the same enrollment.

Two conditions come attached and both catch first-time buyers. The first is a minimum participation rate. On the small business marketplace, in most states at least 70 percent of the employees you offer coverage to must enroll or hold coverage from another source, though HealthCare.gov waives it for applications made between November 15 and December 15 each year. Private carriers set thresholds of their own along similar lines.

The second is a minimum employer contribution toward the employee-only premium, set by the carrier and varying between them. Both get checked before a quote is issued, which is a practical argument for appointing someone before you build a budget around a number nobody has tested.

Broker, PEO, payroll platform, or none of them

A broker is one of four routes to employee health coverage, and the right one depends more on your headcount and cash position than on any feature comparison.

The professional employer organization route deserves particular attention below fifty employees, because pooling can produce plan access a small group cannot buy alone. Justworks publishes its administration fees at $79 an employee monthly for PEO Basic and $124 for PEO Plus, which includes medical, dental, and vision administration. TriNet does not publish rates and quotes per engagement.

The trade-offs are real and worth reading before committing, since exiting a PEO means sourcing your own coverage from scratch.

The reimbursement route deserves attention at the other end. A health reimbursement arrangement lets you contribute a fixed amount toward coverage employees buy themselves, which converts an unpredictable renewal into a budget line you control. For a distributed team across several states it can solve a problem group coverage handles badly.

Do you need a broker yet?

Every firm on this page has an interest in the answer being yes, and for most employers offering group coverage it genuinely is, for a reason that has nothing to do with service quality.

The threshold question about ACA obligations is worth getting right, because it uses full-time equivalents rather than headcount. The IRS explains how the calculation works, and part-time staff count fractionally, so a company with sixty people on the payroll may or may not cross the line.

Below the threshold you may still offer coverage, though most firms that size do not. In the 2025 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 32.1 percent of private-sector establishments at firms with fewer than 50 employees offered health insurance. The reporting obligations below the line are different. This is general information rather than legal or benefits advice.

One thing a broker will not fix is the state of your employee records, and that gap surfaces at the worst moment. Enrollment data goes to an insurer, so a wrong date of birth or a stale address does not produce a warning message. It produces a rejected record, or a wrongly enrolled employee who discovers the problem at a pharmacy counter.

The most reliable moment to capture that data correctly is onboarding, when the employee expects to be asked, rather than the week before open enrollment opens.

How to choose an employee benefits broker

Ask five questions, in this order. The first two eliminate more candidates than any feature comparison will.

A closing note on sequencing. If you are shopping brokers and your renewal is more than four months out, take the time and interview three. If your renewal is six weeks away, appoint someone competent now and do the thorough search next year, because a rushed broker change in the middle of a renewal negotiation is worse than a mediocre broker who already knows your file.

Where to find a small business health insurance broker

Four routes, and the first is free and public. HealthCare.gov runs a Find Local Help tool: enter a ZIP code, filter by small business coverage, and it returns agents and brokers registered to sell through the Small Business Health Options Program. That registration covers a subset of the market rather than all of it.

The other three are less tidy and frequently better. Ask the carriers writing small group business in your state which local agencies place with them, because they know who is actually active. Ask two or three owners of similar companies nearby who they use. And ask your accountant, who has seen what the arrangement costs from the inside.

Whichever route produces a name, check the license before appointing anyone. Insurance producers, the legal term for agents and brokers, are licensed state by state, so the verification sits with your state insurance department, and a broker selling coverage in three states needs a license in each of those states.

Invite your team to FirstHR

4.7 on G2

Start free trial

Ryan HowardActive

Jim HalpertOn Leave

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an employee benefits broker?

A licensed insurance professional or firm that helps an employer select, buy, and manage group benefit plans including medical, dental, vision, life, and disability coverage. The broker shops carriers, designs the plan, supports enrollment, and negotiates at renewal. The same role appears as benefits brokerage, benefit broker, employee benefits insurance broker, and benefits consultant, and the terms are used interchangeably in the US market.

How much does an employee benefits broker cost?

For most small employers, nothing that appears on an invoice. Compensation on a small fully insured group is embedded in the premium by the carrier, as a flat amount per employee per month or a percentage of premium. Because the carrier sets it, HealthCare.gov tells small employers that in general they will not pay more if they use an agent or broker. Fee-based arrangements exist but concentrate among self-funded and larger employers.

Do I need a benefits broker for a small business?

If you offer group health insurance, almost certainly yes, and the reason is economic rather than technical: the commission is in the premium and is generally paid regardless, so going without one leaves paid representation unclaimed. The harder question is whether you should be buying group coverage yet. A very small team with tight cash may be better served by a reimbursement arrangement.

How do employee benefits brokers get paid?

Mostly by carrier commission rather than employer invoice. The percentage depends on carrier, product, and group size, with ancillary lines often carrying higher percentages on smaller premiums. Small groups are frequently paid a flat per employee per month amount instead. Federal law requires written disclosure of direct and indirect compensation before an arrangement starts or renews.

What is the difference between a benefits broker and a PEO?

A broker helps you buy and manage your own plans; a professional employer organization becomes a co-employer and gives you access to its pooled plans. That access is the real attraction for a twenty-person company, because pooling reaches rates a small group cannot buy alone. The trade is a per employee administration fee on top of premiums, less control over plan design, and a harder exit.

Can I switch benefits brokers in the middle of a plan year?

Yes, and it is simpler than most employers expect. The mechanism is a broker of record letter, typically one per carrier, on your letterhead. Coverage, rates, and employee member cards are unaffected because nothing about the plan is being changed, only who services it. The change generally takes effect within a few weeks, no open enrollment window is required, and there is normally no direct cost.

What is the difference between a benefits broker and a benefits consultant?

Mostly compensation and scope rather than a legal boundary. Broker usually means someone paid commission to place and service insurance. Consultant usually means an advisory relationship paid by fee, covering strategy, benchmarking, and vendor selection without necessarily placing coverage. Many firms do both. The useful question is how a firm is paid and what it is contractually responsible for, not which word it uses.

Do I still need a broker if my payroll platform is licensed to sell insurance?

Not necessarily. Several payroll platforms hold insurance licenses and act as broker directly, which puts plan selection, enrollment, and deductions in one system. Gusto charges nothing extra when it acts as your broker and $6 per eligible employee per month if you keep your own. The trade-off is plan selection, since a platform offers its own marketplace rather than the full market in your state.