FirstHR

Can a Sole Proprietor Have Employees? Yes

A sole proprietor can hire, with no limit on headcount. But you are not separate from the business, so their mistakes become your personal liability.

Nick Anisimov

Nick Anisimov

FirstHR Founder

Payroll
22 min

Can a Sole Proprietor Have Employees?

Yes, and there is no limit on how many. But there is one fact about your structure that changes everything about what hiring actually costs you

Yes. A sole proprietor can hire employees, there is no legal limit on how many, and nobody is going to stop you.

That is the answer, it took one sentence, and it is what every article on this subject spends eight hundred words establishing before handing you a checklist of forms.

Here is the thing they leave out, and it is the only part of this that is actually specific to your structure rather than to hiring generally. As a sole proprietor, there is no legal separation between you and the business. Not a thin one. None. And that single fact, which is fine and harmless while you are working alone, becomes something else entirely the moment somebody else is doing things in your name.

Because when your employee makes a mistake at work, the law attributes it to their employer. And you are the employer. Not a company you own. You.

So this guide is what actually changes when a sole proprietor hires: why you cannot put yourself on payroll, why their negligence becomes your personal liability, the family tax breaks that exist only because of your structure, and the genuinely difficult trade between keeping those breaks and protecting your house. I build FirstHR. General information, not legal advice, and this is one of the rare articles where I am going to tell you that an hour with a lawyer is the correct next step.

TL;DR
Yes, and there is no limit on headcount. You need an EIN, state registration, and workers comp, and then the ordinary employer obligations apply. But one fact governs everything: a sole proprietor is not legally separate from the business. Two consequences follow. First, you are not an employee of your own business, so you cannot be on payroll and you take an owner's draw instead. Second, and far more seriously, your employee's negligence becomes your personal liability under respondeat superior, and hiring carefully is not a defense to it. That is why the LLC question is not about tax. It is about your house.

The Short Answer

Yes, unambiguously. Per the IRS guidance on sole proprietorships, a sole proprietor is somebody who owns an unincorporated business by themselves, and nothing about that prevents them from employing people.

You will need an Employer Identification Number, you will need to register with your state, you will need workers compensation, and you will need to do everything any other employer does: withhold, deposit, file, report. The list is long and it is the same list.

The interesting question is not whether you may. It is what is different about doing it as a sole proprietor, and the honest answer is that almost nothing is different about the paperwork and almost everything is different about the risk.

How Many You Can Have

No legal limit. One, or twenty, or two hundred. No statute caps the headcount of a sole proprietorship.

What changes as you grow is not the ceiling but the rules. Employment laws switch on at various headcount thresholds, so the obligations of an employer with fifty people are meaningfully different from those of an employer with three. But that is a function of size rather than of structure, and it applies identically to an LLC.

The Real Limit Is Not Legal
There is no legal cap, and there is a practical one, and it is worth naming plainly. Every employee you add is another person whose conduct is attributed to you personally. At one employee that is a manageable risk. At twenty, you are personally standing behind twenty people's driving, twenty people's judgment, and twenty people's conduct toward customers, with no entity in between and your own assets at the end of it. The law will let you do this. That is not the same as it being sensible, and the point at which it stops being sensible arrives much earlier than the point at which it becomes illegal, which is never.

The One Fact That Matters

Everything genuinely specific to hiring as a sole proprietor descends from a single legal fact, so it is worth stating it precisely before anything else.

Definition
Sole Proprietorship
A sole proprietorship is an unincorporated business owned by one individual, in which no legal distinction exists between the owner and the business. The business is not a separate legal entity: it cannot own property, incur debt, sue, or be sued in its own right. All assets of the business are the owner's personal assets, and all obligations of the business are the owner's personal obligations. Business income is reported on the owner's personal tax return on Schedule C, and the owner pays self-employment tax on net earnings. Two consequences follow directly from the absence of separation: the owner cannot be an employee of the business, since there is no separate entity to employ them; and the owner bears unlimited personal liability for the obligations of the business, including obligations arising from the conduct of the business's employees.

One fact. Two consequences. One of them is an inconvenience and the other one can take your house.

You are not an employee of your own business
You cannot put yourself on payroll. There is nobody to pay you
You take an owner's draw instead, which is not a wage and has no withholding
You pay self-employment tax on your net earnings, not FICA on a salary
Hiring somebody changes none of this. You still take a draw, they get a paycheck
The business's liabilities are your liabilities
There is no entity between you and a claim. The judgment lands on the person
An employee's negligence at work becomes your liability, automatically
A wage claim, a discrimination claim, an injury: your personal assets are reachable
This is the part that changes when you hire, and it changes a great deal

You Are Not Your Own Employee

Take the harmless consequence first, because it is the one people ask about.

You cannot put yourself on payroll. There is no W-2 for you, no withholding from your own pay, no FICA on your own compensation. And the reason is not a rule somebody made; it is that there is nobody to employ you. An employment relationship requires two parties, and here there is one.

Instead you take an owner's draw: money moving out of the business to you. It is not a wage, it is not a deductible business expense, and it does not reduce your tax bill, because your tax is calculated on the profit of the business rather than on how much you happened to take out.

You, the ownerYour employee
How you get paidAn owner's draw. Money out of the businessA wage, on a payroll, with a pay stub
WithholdingNone. Nothing is withheld from a drawFederal income tax, FICA, state tax
Year-end formNone. There is no W-2 for youA W-2
Your tax on itSelf-employment tax, 15.3 percent, on net business earningsTheir FICA share, which you withhold, plus your matching share
Is it a business expense?No. It is not deductibleYes. Wages are a deductible business expense
Must you be paid?No. You can take nothing for a year if you likeYes. Every hour, at least minimum wage, on time

The last row is the one to hold onto, because it is the asymmetry that bites in a bad month. Your employees must be paid whether or not the business made money. You need not be. Which means that when it is tight, the person who goes without is you, and that is a structural feature of hiring rather than a failure of planning.

And note that hiring changes none of this for you. You still take a draw. You still pay self-employment tax on the profit. Two tax systems now run in parallel, and the one that applies to you is not the one that applies to them, which is the subject of a later section.

Still Using Spreadsheets for Onboarding?
Automate documents, training assignments, task management, and track onboarding progress in real time.
See How It Works

Their Mistakes Become Yours

Now the consequence that actually matters, and that almost nothing written on this topic mentions.

There is a doctrine called respondeat superior, which translates roughly as let the master answer. It means that an employer is liable for the negligent acts of an employee committed within the scope of their employment.

For a corporation, that liability lands on the corporation. For an LLC, it lands on the LLC. For a sole proprietorship, there is no entity for it to land on.

What actually changes on the day you hire
It was just youbecomesNow somebody works for you
You could only be liable for what you personally did. Your exposure was bounded by your own conduct
You control the riskbecomesYou control it less
You cannot be in two places at once. The person driving your van, using your equipment, or dealing with your customer is not you
Nothing to attributebecomesRespondeat superior
An employee's negligence within the scope of their work is attributed to the employer automatically, and you are the employer personally
Careful hiring protects youbecomesIt does not
This is strict liability. Hiring carefully, training thoroughly, and supervising properly is legally irrelevant to whether you are liable. It is relevant to whether it happens
The last row is the one worth sitting with. Respondeat superior is strict liability: the fact that you hired carefully and supervised well is not a defense to it. It is an excellent way to reduce the chance of the event happening. It is not a defense once it has.

Work through what this means concretely. Your employee is driving to a job in your van and causes an accident. Your employee, doing exactly the work you hired them to do, injures a customer. Your employee makes a mistake that costs a client a great deal of money.

In each case the claim is against the employer. You are the employer. Not a business you own, because there is no business separate from you. The judgment is against you, and your personal assets, meaning your savings and your home, sit at the end of that chain with nothing in between.

Careful Hiring Is Not a Defense. It Is Just a Good Idea.
This is the part that employers find hardest to accept and it is worth being unambiguous. Respondeat superior is a form of strict liability. The employer is liable for the employee's negligence within the scope of employment regardless of whether the employer did anything wrong at all. You interviewed carefully. You trained thoroughly. You supervised diligently. None of that answers the claim. It makes the underlying event less likely, which is a genuinely good reason to do it. It provides no defense whatsoever once the event has happened, and believing otherwise is how people discover this the expensive way.

There is a second and separate exposure on top of this, which is that you can also be liable for your own negligence in hiring or supervising, and that one is not vicarious at all. But the vicarious liability is the one that arrives without you doing anything wrong, and it is therefore the one you cannot manage away.

What worked for me
The thing that changed how I think about this was not a legal argument, it was arithmetic. A founder I know ran a small trades business as a sole proprietor for years, entirely happily, and hired his first employee without giving the structure a second thought, because why would you: the paperwork was the same, the taxes were the same, everybody said it was fine. Then somebody suggested he ask what would happen if that employee, driving the company van to a job, hit somebody badly. He had assumed the answer involved his business. The answer involved his house. He formed an LLC the following week, and the whole thing had cost him a few hundred dollars and an afternoon, which is a striking price for something he had spent two years not doing because nobody had ever put the question to him in a form that made the stakes visible.

Workers Comp Is Not Optional

Short section, hard rule, and the timing catches people.

Workers compensation insurance is required by state law in nearly every state, and in many of them the threshold is the first employee. It covers your employee if they are injured at work, and it exists precisely because the alternative is that they sue you personally, which for a sole proprietor means exactly what it sounds like.

It has to be in place before they start work rather than after, which means it belongs on the pre-hire list alongside the EIN rather than on the to-do list for their first month. Thresholds and rules vary considerably by state, and the details are in workers compensation insurance.

Two Tax Systems, Same Person

Once you hire, you are running two entirely separate tax regimes at once, and confusing them is common.

15.3%
Self-employment tax, on YOUR net business earnings. Both halves, because you are both
7.65%
FICA you withhold from THEIR wages, and match again out of your own funds
0
Interaction between the two. They run in parallel and do not touch

Per the IRS on self-employment tax, the rate is 15.3 percent, consisting of 12.4 percent for Social Security and 2.9 percent for Medicare, and it applies to net earnings of $400 or more.

That is your tax, and it is unchanged by having employees. Their FICA is a different thing entirely: you withhold 7.65 percent from them and pay 7.65 percent yourself, and none of it has any bearing on what you owe on your own profit. The full employer picture is in payroll tax.

The point of confusion is usually this: paying your employee reduces your business profit, which does reduce your self-employment tax, because there is less profit to be taxed on. But you are not paying FICA on your own draw and you never will be. Two systems, one person, no overlap.

Hiring Family

Here is where being a sole proprietor gives you something rather than costing you something, and the benefit is real.

Family employees, and the tax breaks only a sole proprietor gets
Your child, under 18
FICA: ExemptFUTA: ExemptIncome tax: Withhold
Only if the business is a sole proprietorship or a partnership where every partner is a parent of the child
Your child, 18 to 20
FICA: AppliesFUTA: ExemptIncome tax: Withhold
The FICA exemption ends at 18. The FUTA exemption runs to 21
Your child, 21 and over
FICA: AppliesFUTA: AppliesIncome tax: Withhold
At this point they are treated like any other employee
Your spouse
FICA: AppliesFUTA: ExemptIncome tax: Withhold
A bona fide employee spouse is exempt from FUTA but not from FICA
Your parent
FICA: AppliesFUTA: ExemptIncome tax: Withhold
Same shape as a spouse: FUTA exempt, everything else applies
Anybody else
FICA: AppliesFUTA: AppliesIncome tax: Withhold
The ordinary rules, with no family treatment of any kind
Note the condition on the first row. These exemptions exist because you are a sole proprietorship. Incorporate as an S corp or a C corp and they vanish entirely: your fifteen-year-old is then subject to full payroll taxes like anybody else. Which sets up the real trade in this article, and it is not the one people expect.

Per the IRS guidance on family employees, payments for the services of a child under age 18 are not subject to Social Security and Medicare taxes where the business is a sole proprietorship, and payments to a child under 21 are not subject to FUTA.

This is a genuine and substantial break, and it comes with genuine conditions. The work must be real and appropriate to their age. The pay must be reasonable for the work actually done, not a number chosen for its tax effect. Child labor laws still apply, and they vary by state. And you keep records exactly as you would for any other employee, because a family employee who is not documented like an employee is not an employee, they are a gift with a spreadsheet attached.

Companies Using FirstHR Onboard 3x Faster
Join hundreds of small businesses who transformed their new hire experience.
See It in Action

Should You Form an LLC?

Most articles frame this as a tax question. It is not. It is a liability question, and once you have employees it is a serious one.

Sole proprietorshipSingle-member LLC
Can you hire?Yes, with no headcount limitYes, identically
Liability for an employee's negligenceYours, personally. Your own assets are reachableGenerally the entity's. That is the entire point of it
Default federal tax treatmentSchedule C, self-employment taxUsually a disregarded entity. Schedule C, self-employment tax. Effectively the same
Can you be on payroll?NoNot by default either, since it is disregarded
Family employee tax exemptionsAvailableGenerally retained, since it is treated as a sole proprietorship
Setup cost and effortNone. You already are oneA filing fee and an afternoon

Read the third row and then the second row, in that order, because together they make the case. By default, the tax treatment barely changes. A single-member LLC is generally a disregarded entity: you still file Schedule C, you still pay self-employment tax, and your accountant's year barely changes.

What changes is the second row. You gain a legal entity that stands between a claim and your personal assets, and you gain it at close to zero fiscal cost. Which makes the moment you take on somebody whose conduct will be attributed to you a genuinely sensible moment to reconsider, and the mechanics of hiring once you have are covered in how to hire employees under an LLC.

The shield is not absolute. It does not protect you from your own negligence, it does not survive if you ignore the formalities and treat the entity as a personal pocket, and there are trust fund taxes that pierce it regardless. But partial protection with almost no tax cost is a very different proposition from none.

The Trade Nobody Mentions

And now the complication, because the answer above is a little too easy and there is a genuine competing consideration.

The family tax exemptions are a property of being a sole proprietorship. A single-member LLC that is disregarded generally keeps them, because it is treated as a sole proprietorship for tax purposes. But electing to be taxed as an S corporation, which many people do precisely because it can reduce self-employment tax, destroys them. Your fifteen-year-old is then subject to full payroll taxes like anybody else.

These Are Three Different Decisions and They Get Collapsed Into One
People treat this as a single choice and it is not. Forming an LLC is a liability decision, and by default it costs you almost nothing in tax and keeps the family exemptions. Electing S corporation taxation is a separate decision with real tax consequences in both directions, and it is the one that destroys the family employee exemptions. Collapsing these into a single conversation about whether to incorporate is how people end up either unprotected or unnecessarily taxed. They are separate levers and they should be pulled separately, with an accountant who knows which is which.

Hiring a Contractor Instead

Given everything above, the obvious thought is to hire a contractor rather than an employee, and it is a legitimate one with a real advantage and a large trap.

The advantage is genuine: an employer is generally not vicariously liable for the negligence of an independent contractor, precisely because the control that justifies attributing an employee's acts to the employer is absent. No control, no attribution. That is not a loophole, it is the logic of the doctrine.

You Do Not Choose the Classification. The Relationship Does.
And here is the trap, and it is the worst of both worlds. Whether somebody is an employee or a contractor is determined by the actual working relationship, principally by how much control you exercise over how the work gets done. Calling somebody a contractor while setting their hours, directing their methods, and supplying their tools does not make them one. Which means that if a court later decides your contractor was really an employee, you get the vicarious liability anyway, on top of the back taxes and the penalties, having never actually had the protection you thought you had bought. The test is in employee versus contractor.

What to Do First

The order matters, and doing it backwards means filing to accounts that do not exist yet. The IRS sets out the federal side of it in its guidance on hiring employees, and the state side is a separate exercise you have to do yourself.

Do you have an EIN?
First, before anything else, and it is free from the IRS. You cannot file employment taxes, deposit withholding, or issue a W-2 with only a Social Security number, and a sole proprietor without employees usually does not have one.
Have you registered with your state?
Separate accounts for withholding and for unemployment insurance, in every state where an employee physically works. It has to exist before the first payroll, because you cannot file to an account that does not exist.
Is workers comp in place?
Before their first day, not during their first month. Required in nearly every state, often from the first employee, and operating without it where required exposes you directly.
Have you thought about the entity?
Not a tax question. A liability question, and this is the last moment where thinking about it is cheap. An afternoon and a filing fee, before somebody else's conduct becomes attributable to you.
Are they actually an employee?
Determined by the relationship, not by the label. Get this wrong and you owe back taxes and penalties, and you have the liability you were trying to avoid.
Do you have a system for the paperwork?
W-4, I-9 with Section 2 due within three business days, state withholding certificate, direct deposit, and the state new hire report within 20 days. The full set is in the new hire paperwork guide.
Being Exact About What FirstHR Does Here
FirstHR does not run payroll, form your LLC, or give you legal advice. The two most important decisions in this article, which are the entity and the classification, are a lawyer and an accountant, and I would rather say so than pretend a product solves them. What FirstHR does is the part that comes after: the W-4 and the I-9 collected before day one rather than chased afterwards, the offer signed, the records kept somewhere you can still find them in three years. That is the ordinary machinery of being an employer, and you have just become one.

Common Mistakes

The Recurring Failures
Assuming that because the paperwork is identical, the risk is identical, when the single largest consequence of hiring as a sole proprietor is that your employee's negligence becomes your personal liability with no entity in between. Believing that careful hiring and good supervision protect you from that, when respondeat superior is strict liability and your diligence is not a defense to it. Trying to put yourself on payroll, when you are not an employee of your own business and there is nobody to employ you. Assuming your owner's draw reduces your tax, when your tax is calculated on the profit of the business rather than on what you took out. Hiring before getting an EIN, which means you cannot file, deposit, or report anything. Arranging workers compensation after the employee starts, when in most states it must be in place before. Treating the LLC question as a tax decision, when by default it barely changes your tax and substantially changes your exposure. Collapsing the LLC decision and the S corporation election into one conversation, when the first keeps your family employee exemptions and the second destroys them. Hiring your child and paying them a number chosen for its tax effect rather than for the work actually done. Labeling somebody a contractor to avoid the liability, while controlling their hours and methods, which gets you the liability anyway plus back taxes. And forgetting the state new hire report, which is on no federal calendar and which nothing will prompt you to file.

The thread through the serious ones is a single failure of imagination. Every guide answers can I, and the answer is yes, and the checklist that follows is the same checklist any employer gets.

Nobody answers what am I actually taking on. And the honest answer is that a sole proprietor hiring their first employee is doing something that looks administratively identical to what an incorporated business does and is, in one specific and important respect, completely different: there is nothing standing between what that person does at work and everything you own. The wider first-hire process is in hiring your first employee.

Key Takeaways
Yes, a sole proprietor can hire employees, and there is no legal limit on how many.
One fact governs everything: there is no legal separation between you and the business. Two consequences follow.
First consequence: you are not an employee of your own business. You cannot be on payroll and you take an owner's draw instead.
Your draw is not a wage, not deductible, and does not reduce your tax, which is calculated on business profit rather than on what you withdrew.
Your employees must be paid whether or not the business made money. You need not be. In a bad month, you are the one who goes without.
Second consequence, and the serious one: your employee's negligence at work becomes your personal liability under respondeat superior.
That liability is strict. Careful hiring, training, and supervision reduce the chance of the event and are not a defense once it happens.
You pay self-employment tax at 15.3 percent on your own net earnings, and separately withhold and match FICA on theirs. Two systems, no overlap.
Workers compensation is required in nearly every state, frequently from the first employee, and must be in place before they start.
Family hires are genuinely favorable: a child under 18 is exempt from FICA, under 21 from FUTA, and a spouse is exempt from FUTA.
Those exemptions exist because you are a sole proprietorship. An S corporation election destroys them.
Forming an LLC is a liability decision, not a tax one. By default it is a disregarded entity, so the tax barely changes and the exposure does.
The LLC and the S corp election are separate decisions and collapsing them is how people end up unprotected or unnecessarily taxed.
A contractor does not carry vicarious liability, but you do not get to choose the classification. The working relationship does.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a sole proprietor have employees?

Yes. A sole proprietor can hire employees, and there is no legal limit on how many. You will need an Employer Identification Number, you will need to register with your state, and you take on all the ordinary obligations of an employer: withholding, payroll taxes, workers compensation, and the rest. Nothing about the sole proprietorship structure prevents you from hiring. What it does affect, considerably, is what happens when something goes wrong, because there is no legal separation between you and the business.

How many employees can a sole proprietorship have?

There is no legal cap. A sole proprietorship can have one employee or two hundred, and no statute limits the number. What changes as you grow is which laws apply to you: various employment laws have headcount thresholds, so an employer with fifty employees is subject to obligations that an employer with three is not. But the structure itself imposes no ceiling, and the practical limits on how large a sole proprietorship can get are about liability and financing rather than about the law.

Can a sole proprietor hire employees without an LLC?

Yes, entirely lawfully. Forming an LLC is not a prerequisite to hiring and nobody will stop you. But the question worth asking is not whether you may, it is whether you should, and the reason is that a sole proprietorship offers you no liability separation at all. Everything the business owes, you owe personally, and once you have employees the range of things the business might owe expands considerably and includes things you did not personally do.

Can a sole proprietor be on their own payroll?

No, and this surprises people. You are not an employee of your own business, because there is no separate business to employ you. There is only you. So you cannot pay yourself a W-2 salary, you do not withhold from yourself, and you do not pay FICA on your own compensation. Instead you take an owner's draw, which is simply money moving out of the business to you, and you pay self-employment tax on your net business earnings. Hiring employees does not change any of this.

What is an owner's draw?

It is money the owner takes out of the business for personal use, and it is not a wage. There is no withholding, no payroll, no pay stub, and no W-2. It is not a business expense and it is not deductible, because it is not a payment for services rendered by somebody else, it is simply you moving your own money. The tax you owe is calculated on the profit of the business rather than on how much you drew, which means taking a smaller draw does not reduce your tax bill.

Do I have to pay myself if I have employees?

No. You have no obligation to pay yourself anything, and many sole proprietors take nothing for long periods. Your employees, on the other hand, must be paid at least the applicable minimum wage for every hour worked, on time, every time, whether or not the business made any money that month. That asymmetry is worth understanding before you hire: the payroll obligation is fixed and yours is not, which means in a bad month you are the one who goes without.

What taxes does a sole proprietor pay when they have employees?

Two separate systems that run alongside each other. For your employees, you withhold federal income tax and their share of FICA, and you pay a matching share of FICA plus federal and state unemployment tax. For yourself, none of that applies: you pay self-employment tax at 15.3 percent on your net business earnings, which covers both halves of Social Security and Medicare for you personally. The two do not interact and it is entirely normal to be doing both at once.

Do I need an EIN as a sole proprietor with employees?

Yes. A sole proprietor with no employees can often operate using their Social Security number, but the moment you hire, you need an Employer Identification Number. You cannot file employment tax returns, deposit withheld taxes, or issue a W-2 without one, and you will need it before your first payroll rather than after. It is free, it is obtained from the IRS, and it is the first thing on the list rather than something to sort out later.

Am I liable if my employee injures someone?

Very likely, yes, and personally. Under the doctrine of respondeat superior an employer is liable for the negligent acts of an employee committed within the scope of their employment. For a corporation, that liability lands on the corporation. For a sole proprietorship, there is no corporation: it lands on you, and your personal assets are reachable. This is the single most important consequence of hiring as a sole proprietor and it is the one that most articles on this topic do not mention at all.

Does hiring carefully protect me from that liability?

It reduces the chance of the event happening and it is not a legal defense once it has. Respondeat superior is a form of strict liability: the employer is liable for an employee's negligence within the scope of employment regardless of whether the employer did anything wrong. The fact that you interviewed thoroughly, trained properly, and supervised diligently does not answer the claim. It is worth doing anyway, for obvious reasons, but it should not be mistaken for protection.

Do I need workers compensation insurance as a sole proprietor?

Almost certainly, once you have even one employee. Workers compensation is required by state law in nearly every state, and the threshold is often the first employee. It is not optional, it is not something to arrange later, and operating without it where it is required exposes you to penalties and, more seriously, to a direct claim from an injured employee that your insurance would otherwise have covered. Check your own state, because the thresholds and rules genuinely vary.

Should I form an LLC before hiring employees?

It is worth serious thought, and the reason is liability rather than tax. An LLC creates a legal entity separate from you, which means claims arising from the business, including claims arising from what your employees do, are generally claims against the entity rather than against your personal assets. That protection is not absolute and it does not cover your own personal negligence. But the moment you take on somebody whose conduct you cannot fully control, and whose conduct is legally attributed to you, is a sensible moment to reconsider the structure.

Does forming an LLC change my taxes?

By default, not much. A single-member LLC is generally treated as a disregarded entity for federal tax purposes, which means you continue to report on Schedule C and continue to pay self-employment tax exactly as before. The change is legal rather than fiscal: you gain a liability shield without changing how you are taxed. Electing to be taxed as an S corporation is a further and separate step with real tax consequences, and it is a decision to make with an accountant rather than from an article.

Can I hire my child as a sole proprietor?

Yes, and the tax treatment is genuinely favorable in a way that is specific to your structure. Wages paid to your child under age 18 are not subject to Social Security and Medicare taxes if the business is a sole proprietorship, and wages to a child under 21 are not subject to federal unemployment tax. Income tax withholding applies at any age. The work has to be real, the pay has to be reasonable for the work, and child labor laws still apply, so this is a genuine arrangement rather than a paper one.

Do the family tax exemptions survive if I incorporate?

No, and this is the trade that nobody mentions. The exemption for a child under 18 from Social Security and Medicare applies where the business is a sole proprietorship or a partnership in which every partner is a parent of the child. It does not apply to an S corporation or a C corporation, where your child is subject to full payroll taxes like any other employee. So the same decision that buys you liability protection can cost you the family tax break, and those are two genuinely competing considerations.

Can I hire my spouse as a sole proprietor?

Yes. A spouse who is a bona fide employee, meaning they work under your direction rather than as a co-owner of the business, receives wages subject to income tax withholding and to Social Security and Medicare, but not to federal unemployment tax. The distinction that matters is between employee and partner: if you and your spouse both materially participate and share the profits, you may actually be operating a partnership rather than a sole proprietorship, which is a different structure with different filings.

Can I hire a contractor instead of an employee?

You can, and it is a legitimate choice, but it is not a choice you get to make by labeling. Whether somebody is an employee or a contractor is determined by the actual working relationship, principally by how much control you exercise over how the work is done. Calling somebody a contractor while directing their hours, their methods, and their tools does not make them one. And a misclassification that gets overturned means you owe the withholding you never took, your unpaid matching taxes, and penalties, for the whole period.

Does using a contractor avoid the liability problem?

Partly, and it is one of the genuine practical differences. An employer is generally not vicariously liable for the negligence of an independent contractor, precisely because the control that justifies attributing an employee's acts to the employer is absent. But that only works if they really are a contractor. If a court decides that the person you called a contractor was actually an employee, you get the liability without ever having had the protection you thought you were buying.

What is the first thing I should do before hiring?

Get an EIN, because nothing else can happen without it, and then register with your state for withholding and unemployment. After that, arrange workers compensation, because in most states you need it from the first employee and it has to be in place before they start rather than after. Only then does the employee-facing paperwork begin: the offer, the W-4, the I-9, the direct deposit form, and the state new hire report. Doing it in the wrong order means filing to accounts that do not exist yet.

Can a sole proprietor issue W-2s?

Yes, to employees. Once you have an EIN and employees, you withhold, you file Form 941 quarterly, and you issue a W-2 to each employee at year end exactly as any other employer would. What you cannot do is issue a W-2 to yourself, because you are not an employee of the business. So a sole proprietorship with three staff files three W-2s, and the owner is not among them, which is a small thing that reliably confuses first-time employers.

Ready to transform your onboarding?

7-day free trial No credit card required
Start Your Free Trial