Instructional Designer Interview Questions and Scorecard
Six question sets for hiring an instructional designer without an HR department: needs analysis, design craft, subject-matter experts, tools and accessibility, and measurement, each with why the question is worth asking and what a strong answer sounds like, plus a 1-to-5 scorecard and a portfolio rubric. Download as DOCX.
The way this hire goes wrong is almost always the same. A candidate opens a portfolio, the modules look far better than anything your company has ever produced, and forty minutes later you are certain. What you measured was production quality. What you needed was the judgment to decide what should be built at all, which is invisible in a finished module and shows up only when you ask about the decisions behind it.
At FirstHR, we build for small businesses that make this hire without an HR department, usually with an owner or an operations lead running the process alone and no one in the building who has ever built a course. That is a solvable problem, but not by grading craft you cannot grade. It is solved by asking about reasoning and writing the answers down.
Below are six question sets covering needs analysis, design craft, subject-matter experts, tools and accessibility, and measurement, plus a scorecard with a portfolio rubric and a red-flag checklist. Every question comes with why it is worth asking and what a strong answer sounds like.
TL;DR
An instructional designer interview should test five things: whether they analyze a request before building, whether they can write an observable objective and design practice, whether they can get content out of a busy expert, what they have actually shipped and published, and whether they measure anything past completion rates. Walk two portfolio pieces live and ask a short design exercise. Six question sets and a scorecard download as DOCX.
What This Interview Has to Test
This interview has to separate design judgment from production skill, and a portfolio shows you the second one only. The candidate whose modules look best is not reliably the one who will ask what problem you are solving before spending six weeks building something. Everything below is built to get evidence about the decisions rather than the artifacts.
Three things carry most of the weight for a small company. Does the candidate start from what people do wrong today rather than from a topic? Can they build with almost no production budget? And can they get content out of an expert who has a day job and no reason to help them? A designer can be excellent on craft and hopeless on the other two, and at your size those two are what determine whether anything ships.
The Fastest Filter Takes Thirty Seconds
Ask the candidate to write a learning objective out loud, right now, for a real task in your business. Something like: what should someone be able to do after this training on returns? A strong answer names an observable action with a condition and a standard, such as process a return within two minutes using the current system. A weak answer says understand the returns policy, or be familiar with the process. It is the hardest thing on this page to fake and it takes half a minute, which is why it belongs early in the conversation rather than at the end.
Employee, Contractor, or Neither?
Decide what you are hiring before you interview, because instructional design is mostly an enterprise and mid-market role and a full-time designer with no queue becomes an expensive generalist. Write out the projects for the next twelve months: onboarding content, a compliance refresher, product training, a manager program. If that list fills a year, hire. If it does not, contract.
The decision changes the interview rather than replacing it. A contractor on a fixed-scope engagement lives on scoping, review cycles, and handover, so weight those questions heavily and settle content ownership before work starts. An employee needs the analysis and measurement questions weighted instead, because they will be choosing their own projects for years. The matching instructional designer job description covers the classification and contract-versus-hire decision in more detail.
What the role does
Instructional designer
Corporate trainer
Runs needs analysis before content exists
Writes learning objectives and assessments
Builds e-learning, job aids, and course materials
Stands in front of the room and delivers
Measures whether behavior changed on the job
Many small businesses actually need the middle of that table rather than either end, in which case the training specialist question sets are the better starting point, or the corporate trainer sets if delivery dominates. Be honest about the split before you post, because a designer hired into a delivery job leaves within a year.
The Six Areas to Cover
The sets below split the role into six areas, five of questions plus a scorecard. Ask at least two questions from every set rather than going deep on the one you find most interesting, because the gap that hurts you later is the one you never tested.
Needs Analysis and Scoping
Do they ask before they build?
Turning a request for a course into a defined performance problem, sizing the work, and saying so when training is the wrong fix.
Design Craft
Objectives, structure, practice
Observable objectives, format choice, storyboards, and practice with feedback. You can score these answers without being a designer.
Subject-Matter Experts
The set most kits skip
Getting content and time from a busy expert, closing review cycles, and handling two stakeholders who want opposite things.
Tools, Production, Accessibility
What have they shipped?
Authoring tools, publishing to a learning platform, accessibility requirements, and leaving source files someone else can update.
Measurement and Behavioral
Did anything change?
Evidence past completion rates, plus STAR-style prompts on failed projects, halved deadlines, and feedback that stung.
Scorecard and Red Flags
Score, do not guess
A 1-to-5 rubric across every area, a separate portfolio rubric, a design exercise rubric, and a red-flag checklist.
Weight the Sets to the Work You Have
If your need is turning what your best people already know into repeatable onboarding, the needs analysis and expert sets carry the weight, and you can go lighter on production. If you need a full program built from nothing, design craft and measurement matter more. If your budget for media is zero, say so in the interview and ask what they would build inside that constraint. The answer to that one question tells you more about fit for a small business than any portfolio piece will.
6 Free Instructional Designer Question Sets to Download
Download all six as one Word document, or copy the individual sets you need. Each set opens with why it matters, then lists the questions with a note on why each is worth asking and what a strong answer sounds like, then flags the weak answers. The sixth file is the scorecard.
Download All 6 Instructional Designer Question Sets
Needs analysis, design craft, subject-matter experts, tools and accessibility, measurement and behavioral, plus a 1-to-5 scorecard with a portfolio rubric. All in one DOCX.
Set 1: Needs Analysis and Scoping
The set that separates a designer from a course producer: turning a request into a defined performance problem, sizing the work, and saying so when training is the wrong fix. Start here.
Needs Analysis and Scoping Questions
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNER INTERVIEW: NEEDS ANALYSIS AND SCOPING
Candidate: _____
Interviewer: ___
Date: ___
WHY THIS SET MATTERS
This is the set that separates a designer from a course producer. Anyone can
build what they are handed. The value of the role is deciding what should be
built, how big it should be, and whether training is the right fix at all.
Ask these first, because a candidate who fails here will build polished
courses nobody needed.
QUESTIONS TO ASK
1. A department head tells you the team needs a course on the new returns
policy. What do you do before you build anything?
Why ask: it is the most common request an instructional designer receives.
Strong answer: asks what people are doing wrong today, who says so, what the
business wants to be different afterward, and whether the cause is knowledge,
process, tools, or incentives.
2. Tell me about a time training was the wrong answer and you said so. What did
you propose instead?
Why ask: it tests professional judgment and the willingness to lose work.
Strong answer: a specific request, the evidence that the cause was elsewhere,
and an alternative such as a job aid, a process change, or a manager
conversation.
3. Walk me through the last needs analysis you ran, start to finish.
Why ask: it separates people who name the method from people who have used it.
Strong answer: who they talked to, what they observed, what data they looked
at, and what the analysis changed about the design.
4. How do you decide what to cut when the expert wants everything included?
Why ask: scope control is the daily reality of the job.
Strong answer: cuts against the objectives and the performance gap, moves
reference material to a job aid, and can explain the tradeoff to the expert.
5. What do you ask a manager before you write a single learning objective?
Why ask: it reveals whether the design starts from behavior or from content.
Strong answer: what a person should be able to do afterward, how the manager
will notice, and what happens today when it goes wrong.
6. A request arrives with the content already written, a slide deck attached,
and a deadline. How do you handle it?
Why ask: this is what most small business requests look like.
Strong answer: does not simply reformat the deck, negotiates a short analysis
inside the deadline, and keeps the objectives honest.
7. How do you size a project when nobody can tell you how long the course
should be?
Why ask: unbounded scope is how internal learning projects die.
Strong answer: sizes from the objectives and the audience time available,
proposes a first release rather than a complete curriculum.
8. What do you do when the real problem is a broken process rather than a
knowledge gap?
Why ask: it is the most valuable thing this role can tell you.
Strong answer: says so plainly, offers the smallest useful support, and
escalates the process issue to the owner rather than papering over it.
WHAT A STRONG ANSWER SOUNDS LIKE
Strong candidates start from what people should do differently at work and
work backward to content. They ask questions before promising a format. They
have at least one story about talking a stakeholder out of a course. Weak
candidates start from topics and deliverables, accept the brief as written,
and describe the design process in the abstract without a single real project
attached to it.
NOTES
___
___
___
Set 2: Design Craft: Objectives, Structure, and Practice
Observable objectives, format choice, storyboards, scenario writing, and practice with feedback. You can score these without being a designer, because the answers are about what a learner will do.
Design Craft Questions: Objectives, Structure, and Practice
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNER INTERVIEW: DESIGN CRAFT
Candidate: _____
Interviewer: ___
Date: ___
WHY THIS SET MATTERS
This is the craft itself: objectives, structure, practice, and assessment. You
do not need to be a designer to score these answers. Listen for whether the
candidate can describe what a learner will physically do, and whether they can
justify a format choice with something other than preference.
QUESTIONS TO ASK
1. Write me a learning objective for a task in our business, out loud, right now.
Why ask: it takes thirty seconds and is very hard to fake.
Strong answer: an observable action with a condition and a standard, such as
process a return within two minutes using the current system. Weak answer:
understand the returns policy, be familiar with, be aware of.
2. How do you choose between a job aid, a short video, an e-learning module, and
a live session?
Why ask: format choice is where budget gets wasted.
Strong answer: matches format to the task, the frequency, and whether the
person needs the information in the moment or in their head.
3. Walk me through your storyboard process. What does a reviewer actually see?
Why ask: it reveals whether reviews happen before or after production.
Strong answer: a low-fidelity artifact reviewed and signed off before anything
expensive gets built.
4. What share of a module should be practice, and what does good practice look
like?
Why ask: this is the clearest line between teaching and presenting.
Strong answer: a meaningful share of the time, with realistic decisions,
consequences, and feedback rather than a quiz at the end.
5. How do you write a scenario question where the right answer is not obvious?
Why ask: bad e-learning is mostly obvious multiple choice.
Strong answer: plausible wrong options drawn from real mistakes, feedback
that explains why rather than saying incorrect.
6. Which design models do you use, and where do you deviate from them?
Why ask: it tests whether the model is a tool or a costume.
Strong answer: names a model such as ADDIE, SAM, or backward design, then
describes a real project where the process was compressed or reordered.
7. How do you design for people who already know most of the content?
Why ask: mandatory training for experienced staff is the hardest audience.
Strong answer: lets people test out, branches by role, or shortens the path
rather than making everyone sit through everything.
8. How do you write an assessment that actually tests the objective?
Why ask: most internal assessments test recall of the slides.
Strong answer: the assessment asks the learner to do the thing, or the closest
available proxy, and matches the objective word for word.
WHAT A STRONG ANSWER SOUNDS LIKE
Strong candidates talk about what learners do; weaker ones talk about what
content covers. Listen for practice, feedback, and realistic decisions. A
candidate who can rewrite a vague objective into an observable one in real time
has the core skill, whatever their tool experience. Be cautious with anyone
whose entire answer is about visual polish and engagement without a single
mention of what someone will be able to do afterward.
NOTES
___
___
___
Still Using Spreadsheets for Onboarding?
Automate documents, training assignments, task management, and track onboarding progress in real time.
The set most question lists skip, and the one that predicts whether projects finish: extracting content from a busy expert, closing review cycles, and handling contradictory feedback from two stakeholders.
Subject-Matter Expert and Stakeholder Questions
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNER INTERVIEW: SUBJECT-MATTER EXPERTS AND STAKEHOLDERS
Candidate: _____
Interviewer: ___
Date: ___
WHY THIS SET MATTERS
Most instructional design projects fail on the relationship, not the craft. The
expert is busy, has no incentive to help, and wants everything included. At a
small business the expert is usually your best operator or you. A designer who
cannot extract content and close a review cycle will stall on every project,
however good their portfolio looks.
QUESTIONS TO ASK
1. How do you get time and content from an expert who has no reason to
prioritize you?
Why ask: this is the single biggest project risk.
Strong answer: books short structured sessions, comes with specific questions
or a draft to react to, and never asks an expert to write content from blank.
2. Tell me about an expert who disagreed with your design. What happened?
Why ask: it separates collaboration from compliance.
Strong answer: separates fact from format, concedes on accuracy, holds the
line on structure, and escalates only when the outcome is at risk.
3. How do you run a review cycle so feedback does not arrive on version ten?
Why ask: uncontrolled review cycles are where budgets disappear.
Strong answer: named reviewers, defined rounds, a sign-off gate at the
storyboard, and a rule about what can change after production starts.
4. What do you do when the expert insists on including everything they know?
Why ask: it happens on almost every project.
Strong answer: uses the objectives as the filter, offers a reference document
or job aid for the rest, and shows the expert where their content survived.
5. Two stakeholders give you contradictory feedback. What do you do?
Why ask: at a small business this is the owner and a department lead.
Strong answer: gets them in the same room or the same document, frames the
choice against the objective, and asks for a decision rather than mediating
forever.
6. What do you send an expert before the first meeting?
Why ask: preparation is the difference between one session and five.
Strong answer: a short outline, specific questions, or a rough draft to react
to, plus a clear time commitment.
7. Tell me about a project where the expert went quiet for three weeks.
Why ask: it tests what they do when the plan breaks.
Strong answer: kept the project moving with what they had, made the delay and
its consequence visible to the sponsor, and did not silently absorb it.
WHAT A STRONG ANSWER SOUNDS LIKE
Strong candidates treat expert time as the scarcest resource on the project and
design their process around protecting it. They arrive with drafts rather than
blank pages, they close review rounds, and they make delays visible early. Weak
candidates describe experts as obstacles, or describe a process so formal it
could only work inside a large company with a project manager attached.
NOTES
___
___
___
Set 4: Tools, Production, and Accessibility
What they have shipped, how they publish to a learning platform, what they build when the media budget is zero, and how they meet accessibility requirements. Federal guidance on creating accessible content is a reasonable benchmark even when Section 508 does not apply to you directly.
Tools, Production, and Accessibility Questions
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNER INTERVIEW: TOOLS, PRODUCTION, AND ACCESSIBILITY
Candidate: _____
Interviewer: ___
Date: ___
WHY THIS SET MATTERS
Tools are the easiest thing to over-weight and the easiest thing to verify.
A designer who understands structure can learn your authoring tool. A designer
who only knows one tool and no design principles cannot learn judgment. Use
this set to confirm they have shipped real things, and to cover the two topics
small businesses forget: accessibility and handover.
QUESTIONS TO ASK
1. What have you built end to end, and in which tools?
Why ask: it distinguishes shipping from assisting.
Strong answer: specific projects with their own role stated honestly, naming
authoring tools, video tools, and any learning platform they published to.
2. How do you publish to a learning platform, and what do SCORM or xAPI actually
give you?
Why ask: it is a five-second test of real platform experience.
Strong answer: explains that the standard is how the course reports
completion, scores, or activity back to the platform, and has debugged a
tracking problem at least once.
3. How do you make a module accessible?
Why ask: it is a legal and practical requirement most templates skip.
Strong answer: captions, keyboard navigation, meaningful alt text, color
contrast, no color-only meaning, and reading order, referenced against WCAG
or Section 508 rather than described as making it nice for everyone.
4. The budget for video and professional voiceover is zero. What do you build?
Why ask: this is the actual small business condition.
Strong answer: resourceful and unbothered, proposes job aids, screen
recordings, structured practice, or a live session with a workbook.
5. How do you organize source files so someone else can update the course in a
year?
Why ask: handover is where internal content quietly dies.
Strong answer: naming conventions, a single source of truth, editable source
files, and a short update note stored with the project.
6. Walk me through your quality checks before a course goes live.
Why ask: broken navigation and tracking undermine trust immediately.
Strong answer: a real checklist covering links, navigation, mobile view,
tracking, and a pilot with a small group before release.
7. How quickly can you pick up a tool you have not used, and when did you last
do it?
Why ask: it is the fair way to handle a tool mismatch.
Strong answer: a specific example with a timeframe, not a claim about being a
fast learner.
8. Policy changes and half a course goes stale. What is your process?
Why ask: maintenance is most of the work after year one.
Strong answer: a review cadence, version notes, and a way to flag affected
content quickly rather than rebuilding from scratch.
WHAT A STRONG ANSWER SOUNDS LIKE
Strong candidates are specific about what they personally built and honest about
where they had help. They treat accessibility as a requirement rather than an
afterthought, and they can work without a production budget. Do not over-filter
on a specific authoring tool: design judgment transfers between tools, and tool
familiarity is the fastest thing on this page for a good candidate to acquire.
NOTES
___
___
___
Set 5: Measurement, Behavioral, and Situational
Evidence past completion rates, plus STAR-style prompts on a course that failed, a halved deadline, feedback that stung, and something they built that nobody used.
Measurement, Behavioral, and Situational Questions
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNER INTERVIEW: MEASUREMENT AND BEHAVIORAL EVIDENCE
Candidate: _____
Interviewer: ___
Date: ___
WHY THIS SET MATTERS
Completion rates prove attendance, not learning. This set tests whether the
candidate has ever had to show that something changed, and how they behave when
a project goes wrong. Behavioral answers are the best available predictor,
because they describe what someone actually did rather than what they believe
they would do.
QUESTIONS TO ASK
1. How do you know a course worked, beyond completions?
Why ask: it is the question that separates a designer from a content producer.
Strong answer: distinguishes reaction, learning, behavior on the job, and
business result, and names a follow-up check weeks later.
2. What measure did you agree with the business before you built the last thing
you built?
Why ask: measurement decided afterward is usually invented afterward.
Strong answer: a specific measure agreed with a named stakeholder up front,
even a rough proxy such as error rate or time to competence.
3. Tell me about a course that did not work. What did you change?
Why ask: everyone has one, and the answer shows whether they look.
Strong answer: names the failure honestly, diagnoses the cause, and describes
a specific revision and its effect.
4. Tell me about the hardest feedback you have received on a design.
Why ask: this role is reviewed by non-designers constantly.
Strong answer: takes the content of the feedback seriously without collapsing
or defending, and can say what changed as a result.
5. Your deadline is cut in half the week after kickoff. What do you cut?
Why ask: it tests prioritization under pressure, which is the normal state.
Strong answer: protects objectives and practice, cuts production polish and
scope, tells the stakeholder what they are losing before it happens.
6. Tell me about something you built that nobody used. What did you learn?
Why ask: unused content is common and rarely discussed honestly.
Strong answer: takes real ownership, usually about adoption, timing, manager
support, or solving a problem nobody had.
7. How do you decide when to redesign a course versus retire it?
Why ask: a small library needs pruning more than it needs additions.
Strong answer: judges by whether the need still exists and whether use and
results justify the maintenance.
WHAT A STRONG ANSWER SOUNDS LIKE
Use the STAR pattern: a real Situation and Task, the specific Action the
candidate took, and a Result you could verify. Strong candidates get past
completion and satisfaction data without being pushed, name a stakeholder they
agreed a measure with, and own failures in the first person. Weak candidates
answer with process descriptions, blame the audience or the tools, and cannot
name a single project that disappointed them.
NOTES
___
___
___
Set 6: Scorecard, Portfolio Rubric, and Red Flags
A 1-to-5 rubric across all seven interview areas, a separate five-line portfolio rubric, a design exercise rubric, and a red-flag checklist, so the decision rests on written evidence rather than on how good the modules looked.
Scorecard, Portfolio Rubric, and Red Flags
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNER INTERVIEW SCORECARD
Candidate: _____
Interviewer: ___
Date: ___
Score each area from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). Write one line of evidence from
the interview next to every score. Fill this in on your own before anyone
discusses the candidate, so the most senior opinion in the room does not anchor
Keep the completed scorecards with the rest of your hiring records for the role, and move the signed paperwork onto the employee profile once someone accepts. Applicant tracking is coming soon to FirstHR, so for now a shared folder per role is enough to keep the evidence in one place.
How to Review the Portfolio
Review the portfolio live, in the interview, and never silently in advance. The artifact tells you what a candidate can produce with time and a budget you may not have. The walkthrough tells you why every decision in it was made, which is the part you are actually hiring.
Pick two pieces, ideally one they are proud of and one that looks closest to your world. Ask the same questions about both. A strong candidate answers all of them without hesitation and usually volunteers the messy parts on their own, because real projects are messy and they remember why.
Ask about every piece
What a strong answer sounds like
What problem was this built to solve?
A performance problem with a person attached, not a topic that needed covering
Who decided that was the problem?
Names a stakeholder and what evidence convinced them, or admits it was assigned
What was your own role?
Precise about what they built versus what a team or vendor built
What did you cut, and why?
A specific cut with the reasoning, usually against the objectives
What constraint did you design around?
Budget, expert time, deadline, or the audience being unable to leave the floor
What would you change now?
One concrete change with a reason, not a modest generality
Two warnings worth keeping in mind. Visual polish is the least reliable signal on the table, because a plain module can be the piece that halved an error rate while a beautiful one can be a stock template with someone else's content dropped in. And be reasonable about confidentiality: a candidate under an agreement may only be able to show screenshots and describe the work, which is not evasion.
The Short Design Exercise
A short exercise is the best predictor in this whole process, because it shows you the thinking rather than the finished surface. Give every finalist the same small brief: a realistic but made-up scenario from your business, a page of scoping and outline design, a fixed time limit, and no expectation of production.
Score it on what matters. Did they start from the performance problem or from the topic? Are the objectives observable? Is the format choice justified rather than assumed? Is there practice with feedback? Did they ask clarifying questions before starting, which is the strongest single signal in the exercise? The scorecard includes those five lines.
Because it functions as a selection procedure, run it identically for every finalist and score it in writing. EEOC guidance on employment tests and selection procedures expects them to be job-related and consistent with business necessity, which a short design task plainly is for a design job. Keep it under about two hours or pay for it, and never use a live project you actually need built.
The Subject-Matter Expert Questions
Ask these even if you think they are soft, because most instructional design projects fail on the expert relationship rather than on the craft. At a small business the expert is your best operator, or the owner, and their available time is the real budget for the project.
Strong candidates design their process around protecting expert time. They arrive with a draft or a specific list of questions rather than asking someone to write content from a blank page. They book short structured sessions instead of open-ended ones. They close review rounds with named reviewers and a sign-off gate before anything expensive gets produced, which is the mechanism that keeps feedback from arriving on version ten.
The Answer That Marks a Real Practitioner
Listen for what the candidate sends an expert before the first meeting. Someone who says they send a rough outline or a bad first draft to react to, rather than a request for content, has run real projects inside a real company. Experts are far better at correcting something wrong than at producing something from nothing, and a designer who has learned that has usually learned it the hard way. It is a small detail and it separates experience from theory better than almost any other prompt in this interview.
Push past the first answer here. Ask what they said, what the expert said back, and what happened to the timeline. A candidate whose process only works with a project manager and a formal review tool attached will struggle in a company where the expert is the owner and the review happens between two other meetings. A designer who has run a training needs assessment in a small company usually shows it in this answer more than anywhere else.
Testing for Impact, Not Completion
Ask how the candidate knows a course worked, then keep asking until they get past completion rates and satisfaction scores. Completion proves people clicked through. It is the metric a learning platform makes easiest to report, which is exactly why it dominates answers that have not been thought about.
Strong candidates separate the levels of evidence without being prompted: what people thought, what they can now do, what they do differently at work weeks later, and what that moved in the business. That ladder is the Kirkpatrick model, and the vocabulary matters far less than the thinking behind it.
Companies Using FirstHR Onboard 3x Faster
Join hundreds of small businesses who transformed their new hire experience.
What did people do differently the following month?
The feedback scores were high
What is the closest thing to a business measure you had?
We ran a quiz at the end
How did you check the behavior on the job?
The stakeholder was happy
What did you agree with them before you built it?
It is hard to measure that
What proxy would you use if I asked you to try?
The follow-up matters more than the original question. Listen for a mechanism that exists after the course closes: a manager observation, an agreed metric, a check-in at thirty days. The strongest answers describe a measure agreed with a named stakeholder before anything was built, which is also the habit that protects a small learning budget from being cut.
What to Probe For (and Red Flags)
The questions open the door; the follow-ups are where you learn anything. Push for the specific decision, the actual constraint, the real number. Below are the patterns worth listening for and the ones that should give you pause.
Analysis signals
Asks what people do wrong today before proposing anything
Has talked a stakeholder out of a course at least once
Sizes work from objectives, not from a page count
Craft signals
Objectives use observable verbs with a standard attached
Can say what the learner physically does in the module
Justifies format by task and frequency, not preference
Evidence signals
Names a measure agreed before the build started
States their own role on team projects without prompting
Can say what they cut from a project and why
Red flags
Every request becomes a course
Portfolio is polished but no decision can be explained
Success is measured only by completion rates
The most useful follow-up in this interview is some version of why did you make that choice. A strong candidate answers with a constraint and a tradeoff. A weaker one restates what they built in different words, and you can watch it happen in real time.
What Instructional Designers Are Paid
Federal statistics have no occupation called instructional designer, so use instructional coordinators as the baseline and adjust for your industry and seniority. Corporate design roles also overlap with training and development specialists, and the two figures together bracket most of what you will see in the market.
Median $77,440 a Year (BLS OEWS, May 2025)
Instructional coordinators, the occupation that covers instructional designers, earned a national median annual wage of $77,440, about $37.23 an hour, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey (May 2025). The tenth percentile earned $47,980, the twenty-fifth $60,780, the seventy-fifth $98,820, and the ninetieth $121,670. The federal occupation profile projects slower than average employment growth of 1% to 2% from 2024 to 2034, with roughly 21,900 openings a year.
Benchmark (BLS OEWS, May 2025)
National figure
When this is the right number
Instructional coordinators (25-9031)
$77,440 median
The closest official occupation to an instructional designer
Twenty-fifth percentile
$60,780
A junior designer building inside an existing template and library
Seventy-fifth percentile
$98,820
Owns the design function, produces media, and measures outcomes
Training and development specialists (13-1151)
$69,280 median
The role also delivers training rather than only designing it
Say your range early rather than at the offer. A candidate whose expectations sit above your ceiling will not become affordable after a brilliant design exercise, and you will have spent the time anyway. If the number does not stretch to a full-time designer, that is useful information about whether a contract engagement is the honest answer.
Fair, Legal, and Structured Interviewing
Asking every candidate the same job-related questions and scoring them on the same rubric is both the fairer approach and the more accurate one. It matters here because portfolios differ so much in polish that they create a false sense of difference between candidates, and a structured interview is what keeps that in proportion.
Ask about the job, not the person
Federal anti-discrimination law, enforced by the EEOC, prohibits basing a hiring decision on protected characteristics, and a question that probes one creates risk even when it is asked as friendly small talk. Keep age, race, religion, national origin, sex, pregnancy or family plans, disability, and genetic information out of the conversation. Instructional design interviews drift there more easily than most, because the portfolio conversation is personal and the field skews toward people who came from teaching or another career: where you studied, how long you have been doing this, why you left the classroom, and what your family situation allows are all inquiries to keep out of a hiring decision. Tie every question to designing learning that changes behavior. This is general information, not legal advice.
Same core questions, every candidate
Write the questions before you meet anyone, ask the same core set of everyone, and score them against the same rubric. A structured interview predicts on-the-job performance better than a free-flowing conversation and it makes candidates genuinely comparable, which matters here because portfolios are wildly different in polish and give a false sense of difference. Pick two questions from each set, keep them in the same order, and take notes as you go rather than reconstructing afterward. The differences that then show up between candidates are differences in answers, not differences in how the conversation happened to go. Consistency is also the simplest protection against a decision you cannot explain later.
Treat a design exercise as a selection procedure
If you ask for a design exercise, it is a selection procedure, so run it identically for everyone: same brief, same time limit, same scoring sheet. EEOC guidance expects selection procedures to be job-related and consistent with business necessity, which a short design task plainly is for a design job. What creates exposure is running it loosely, asking some candidates and not others, or scoring it on impressions nobody wrote down. Keep it small, keep it generic enough that you are not getting free work on a live project, and pay for anything longer than about two hours. This is general information, not legal advice.
Weight the sets to the work you actually have
A designer building onboarding and compliance content for one location is a different hire from one building a customer-facing curriculum across product lines. Decide which you are before you interview. If most of your need is turning existing expertise into repeatable onboarding, weight needs analysis, expert wrangling, and production constraints. If you need a learning program built from nothing, weight design craft and measurement. Write down what the role must deliver in its first ninety days, then choose questions that test exactly that, rather than interviewing for a generic enterprise designer you do not need and cannot keep busy.
Keep Every Question Tied to the Job
Federal anti-discrimination law prohibits basing hiring decisions on protected characteristics, and the EEOC guidance on prohibited practices is explicit that pre-employment inquiries into race, sex, national origin, age, religion, disability and family status are irrelevant to whether someone can do the job. Asking the same job-related questions of everyone is the simplest protection, and it is also the approach that reduces bias and predicts performance better. This is general information, not legal advice.
Watch the career-change small talk in particular. Instructional design attracts people who came from teaching or another field, and a friendly question about why they left the classroom, how long ago they graduated, or whether the hours suit their family is exactly the kind of inquiry to keep out of a hiring conversation. Our guide to questions employers cannot ask covers the full list.
Interviewing a Designer Without HR
At a company with a learning team, a designer is interviewed by other designers who can read a portfolio in four minutes and know which questions expose a thin one. At a small business the owner does it alone, between everything else, having never built a course. Here is where that goes wrong and what to do instead.
Nobody in the building can grade instructional design
At a company with a learning team, a designer is interviewed by other designers who can tell a real portfolio from a pretty one in about four minutes. At a small business the owner or an operations lead does it alone, having never built a course. The counter is to stop grading the craft and start grading the reasoning. Three signals do most of the work: does the candidate start from what people do wrong today rather than from a topic, can they name a measure they agreed with someone before building, and can they tell you what they cut and why. Every question set on this page states what a strong answer sounds like for exactly that reason.
A polished portfolio is the easiest thing to mistake for skill
Portfolios reward visual production, which is the part of the job you are least likely to need and most likely to be impressed by. A beautiful module can be a template with someone else’s content dropped into it, and a plain-looking one can be the piece that cut call handling time in half. Do not review portfolios silently in advance. Walk through two pieces live and ask what problem it solved, what their own role was, what they cut, and what they would change now. A candidate who cannot answer those about their own best work is showing you production, not design.
You may not need a full-time designer at all
This is mostly an enterprise and mid-market role. A smaller company often gets more from a contract designer for a defined project, or from an operations lead who owns training with a platform behind them. Before you interview, write down the projects for the next twelve months and see whether they fill a year. If they do not, interview contractors with the same question sets and add the scoping and handover questions, which matter more on a fixed-scope engagement. FirstHR covers the hiring side after the decision: e-signature on the offer or contractor agreement, new hire paperwork, onboarding workflows, and training modules to build content in. Applicant tracking is coming soon to FirstHR, so keep candidate records in your own folder for now.
Once you choose someone, the work changes from evaluating to hiring well: a clear offer, the paperwork, agreement on who owns the content that gets created, and a first ninety days concrete enough that something real ships. Designers ramp faster than most hires if you hand them the honest picture early, including the budget that does not exist.
Send the offer or the agreement
Confirm the role, the pay, the start date, and who owns the content that gets created, with e-signature so the record is clean from day one.
Hand over the real picture
Give them the existing content, the promises already made, the tools you have, and the budget that does not exist, in the first week rather than the third.
Agree the first project and its measure
Pick one project for the first ninety days with a measure attached, so their early work is visible and you both know what success looks like.
Onboard and keep the records together
Run the standard new hire workflow and store the signed paperwork and the completed interview scorecards on the employee profile.
Give the new designer one project in the first ninety days with a measure attached, and a place to build it. If the content has nowhere to live, the first months disappear into tool selection instead of design. Pairing the start with an onboarding template keeps the administrative side from eating that time, and the offer letter template handles the step before it.
FirstHR connects the offer, the e-signature, the new hire paperwork, the onboarding workflow and the training modules in one place, and stores the signed documents and the interview scorecards on the employee profile, so a small business can run hiring through to onboarding from a single system. FirstHR is an onboarding and HR platform rather than a full authoring suite, so pair it with whatever tools your designer builds media in. Applicant tracking is coming soon to FirstHR, so keep the candidate pipeline itself wherever it lives today.
Key Takeaways
Test design judgment, not production quality: a portfolio shows what someone can produce, not whether they decide the right thing to build.
Cover five areas: needs analysis and scoping, design craft, subject-matter experts, tools and accessibility, and measurement with behavioral evidence.
Ask a candidate to write a learning objective out loud; understand and be aware of are the fastest tells in the interview.
Walk two portfolio pieces live and ask what problem each solved, what their own role was, what they cut, and what they would change now.
Run one short design exercise with the same brief for every finalist, score it in writing, and pay for anything over about two hours.
Benchmark pay against instructional coordinators, a national median of $77,440 a year (BLS OEWS, May 2025), and contract instead of hiring when the twelve-month project list is thin.
Frequently Asked Questions
What questions should I ask an instructional designer candidate?
Ask across five areas: needs analysis and scoping, design craft, working with subject-matter experts, tools and accessibility, and measurement plus behavioral evidence. The most useful questions are concrete rather than philosophical. A department head says the team needs a course on the new returns policy, what do you do before you build anything. Write me a learning objective for this task, out loud, right now. How do you get content out of an expert who has no reason to prioritize you. How do you know a course worked, beyond completion rates. Tell me about a time training was the wrong answer and you said so. Each of those forces a specific answer instead of a rehearsed description of a design process. The six downloadable sets on this page pair every question with why it is worth asking and what a strong answer sounds like, so you can judge substance without being a designer yourself.
How do I review an instructional designer portfolio if I am not a designer?
Do not review it silently in advance. Pick two pieces and walk through them live, because the value is in the explanation rather than the artifact. Ask what problem the piece was built to solve, who decided that was the problem, what their own role was if a team was involved, what they cut and why, what constraint they designed around, and what they would change now. A strong candidate answers all six easily and often volunteers the messy parts. A weak one describes features of the module and cannot say why any decision was made. Visual polish is the least reliable signal you will see: a beautiful module can be a stock template with someone else’s content in it, and a plain one can be the piece that halved the error rate. The portfolio rubric in the downloadable scorecard scores exactly these questions rather than the look of the work.
Should I give a design exercise, and should it pay?
A short exercise is the single best predictor in this interview, and yes, pay for anything beyond about two hours. Keep it small and generic: one page of scoping and design for a made-up but realistic scenario from your business, with a fixed time limit, given to every finalist with the same brief and scored on the same sheet. Never use a live project you actually need built, because that is free work and candidates recognize it immediately. Because the exercise functions as a selection procedure, run it identically for everyone and score it in writing. What you are looking for is not production quality: it is whether they start from the performance problem, write observable objectives, justify the format, include practice with feedback, and ask clarifying questions before starting. The scorecard on this page includes a five-line rubric for exactly that.
What is the difference between an instructional designer and a trainer?
An instructional designer builds the learning; a trainer delivers it. The designer runs needs analysis, writes objectives, works with subject-matter experts, builds courses, e-learning, job aids, and assessments, and evaluates whether the learning worked. A corporate trainer stands in front of the room, live or on video. A training specialist sits between the two and often does both. At a small business the roles usually collapse into one person, so decide which weighting you need before you write the posting: someone who designs and rarely presents, someone who presents and lightly designs, or a generalist who does both badly enough to be honest about it. In federal data the designer role maps most closely to instructional coordinators, code 25-9031, while trainers and training specialists fall under training and development specialists, code 13-1151.
What are red flags in an instructional designer interview?
The clearest red flag is a candidate who accepts every request as a course without ever asking what problem it solves, because that is the behavior that fills a learning library with content nobody needed. Others worth weighing: learning objectives written as understand, know, or be aware of; a polished portfolio with no decision the candidate can explain; being unable to state their own role on a team project; measuring success only by completion rates or satisfaction scores; sample modules that are all content and then a quiz, with no practice anywhere; describing subject-matter experts as obstacles; never having pushed back on a request that was the wrong fix; and accessibility never coming up in any project they describe. In a design exercise, watch for someone who starts building before asking a single clarifying question.
How much does an instructional designer cost to hire?
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey (May 2025), instructional coordinators, the occupation that covers instructional designers, earned a national median annual wage of $77,440, about $37.23 an hour. The spread is wide: the tenth percentile earned $47,980, the twenty-fifth $60,780, the seventy-fifth $98,820, and the ninetieth $121,670. Corporate design roles also overlap with training and development specialists, which had a median of $69,280 in the same survey, so the two together bracket most of the market. Smaller employers usually land between the twenty-fifth and seventy-fifth percentiles, with seniority, industry, and whether the role produces media as well as designing it driving where you sit. Contract designers are typically paid per project or hourly instead. Benchmark against your local market before you publish a range.
Should a small business hire an instructional designer or contract one?
Contract first unless you can show twelve months of real projects. Instructional design is mostly an enterprise and mid-market role, and a full-time designer with nothing queued after the first two projects becomes an expensive generalist. Write out the work you actually have: onboarding content, a compliance refresher, product training, a manager program. If that fills a year, hire. If it does not, engage a contractor for a defined project, or give an operations lead ownership of training with a platform behind them. Interview contractors with the same question sets, weighting scoping, review cycles, and handover more heavily, since a fixed-scope engagement lives or dies on those. Also settle who owns the content that gets created before work starts, and put it in the agreement rather than discovering it at the end.
Are these instructional designer interview questions free?
Yes. Every question set on this page downloads as a Word document at no cost and with no sign-up, and you can take all six at once or only the ones that fit your situation. Each set opens with why it matters, then lists the questions with a note on why each is worth asking and what a strong answer sounds like, then flags the weak answers to watch for. The sixth file is a scorecard with a 1-to-5 rubric across every interview area, a separate portfolio review rubric, a design exercise rubric, and a red-flag checklist. Use them as a starting point and add questions specific to your content, your tools, and the projects you need built. The point is to give a small business a structured, professional interview for this role without building one from scratch.
