FirstHR

Employee Background Check Services: 13 Compared

Employee background check services compared: 13 providers, real per-check cost with passthrough fees, and the FCRA steps every employer owes candidates.

Nick Anisimov

Nick Anisimov

FirstHR Founder

General•
•
21 min

Employee Background Check Services: 13 Compared

Which providers publish a price and which will not, what a check actually costs once passthrough fees land, the FCRA steps that are the employer's responsibility rather than the vendor's, and how screening fits into the rest of hiring

Two things make background check services hard for a small business to shop, and this comparison is built around both. The first is price: most providers will not tell you what a check costs until you talk to sales, and a published price understates the invoice by a wide margin, because court access fees are added afterward and vary by county.

The second is legal responsibility, which does not sit where buyers assume. The provider runs the check, but the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) places the disclosure, authorization, and adverse action obligations on the employer. A vendor can build those steps into its workflow, and the good ones do, but if the paperwork is wrong, the exposure is yours, not theirs.

What follows compares 13 background check companies, separates the ones that publish rates from the ones that will not, sets the advertised rates against the access fees that land on top of them, and lays out the FCRA steps you owe every candidate. No provider here paid for placement.

TL;DR
Background check services verify a candidate's identity, criminal history, and employment, but the FCRA disclosure and adverse action duties fall on the employer, not the vendor. Published base rates start at $13.99 at Certn, with $29.99 the usual small business entry. Court and database access fees are billed on top. Five of the thirteen providers here publish no price.

What employee background check services do

A background check service is a consumer reporting agency that verifies a candidate's history on your behalf. It confirms identity, searches criminal records across the jurisdictions where the candidate has lived, and verifies the employment and education history they gave you. Everything beyond that is optional and priced separately.

Definition
Employee background check services
Regulated consumer reporting agencies that compile pre-employment reports for employers. Also sold as background check companies, background checking services, employment background check services, background screening, or pre employment background check companies. Because the reports inform hiring decisions, providers operate under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which sets out what an employer must disclose to a candidate before and after a report is obtained.

Employee background checks are close to universal among US employers, which is worth knowing mainly because it means candidates expect them. According to the Professional Background Screening Association and HR.com annual screening survey (2021), 95 percent of organizations with at least one US location run some form of employment background screening, against 79 percent of organizations with no US presence.

For a small employer, then, the question is rarely whether to screen but which package matches the role and what it will actually cost. Treat screening as a line item to size correctly, not a decision to agonize over, because the sizing is where the money goes.

Background check software and what the platform layer adds

Background check software and background screening services are the same purchase. Every provider compared here is a consumer reporting agency, and what the software label describes is the platform wrapped around the report. That layer is where providers genuinely differ for a company with no HR function.

Four things live in it. Bulk ordering, so twenty candidates can be invited from one upload rather than one at a time. Integration with your applicant tracking system (ATS) or HR information system (HRIS), so a check starts from the candidate record instead of a retyped email address. A candidate portal that collects consent and shows status. And FCRA sequencing that issues each required notice on schedule.

AI sits on top of that layer, usually as adjudication: the platform compares a returned record against rules you set and flags the ones a person needs to read. It is genuinely useful for clearing the clean reports quickly.

Automated adjudication moves none of the obligation, though, because the duties in the joint FTC and EEOC guidance for employers stay with you, and a rejection driven by an automated flag still needs someone who can explain the decision.

Background check, background verification, or screening?

These phrases describe the same activity but signal different markets, and searching on the wrong one produces a shortlist you cannot use.

TermWhat it signalsWho uses it
Background checkThe standard US employer term, governed by the FCRAUS employers, US providers, US regulators
Pre-employment screeningThe same thing framed as a hiring process stepHR professionals and industry bodies
Background verificationSame activity, but the phrasing dominant in India and global outsourcingIndian providers and BPO-heavy markets
Background screeningVendor-side term for the industry as a wholeProviders describing their own category
Employment verificationOne component of a check, not a whole productEmployers and lenders confirming work history
E-VerifyA federal work authorization system, not a background check at allEmployers confirming I-9 eligibility electronically
Reference checkSubjective conversations about performance, outside FCRA when done informallyHiring managers calling former colleagues

Two of those are worth separating clearly because they get conflated constantly. E-Verify is a federal system that compares Form I-9 data against government records to confirm someone is authorized to work in the United States; it tells you nothing about criminal history and is not a background check.

A reference check is a conversation about how someone performed, which is a different question from whether their stated history is true. A background check verifies facts; a reference check gathers opinions.

Which label you use matters in practice. Searches for background verification companies, background verification services, or a background verification company return largely Indian providers such as SpringVerify, AuthBridge, and IDfy, alongside directory listings, because that is the phrasing that market uses. The same applies to searches for a background verification check or employee background verification, which return process explainers written for that market.

Firms serving that market are legitimate, but they are not built around FCRA workflow and are the wrong shortlist for a US employer. If you are hiring in the United States, search on background check and evaluate on FCRA compliance.

Why background verification companies around me is the wrong search
Location is close to irrelevant in this category. A background check is compiled from records held wherever the candidate has lived and worked, so a provider two miles from your office pulls the same county court records as one across the country, through the same access channels. National consumer reporting agencies generally have broader court coverage and faster turnaround than a local firm precisely because they run at volume. The only genuine reason to prefer a regional provider is deep familiarity with a specific state's court quirks, and even then you should compare turnaround and price against a national option.

What an employee background check actually covers

Packages are assembled from standard components, and the components are broadly the same across every provider. Knowing them lets you price a package properly rather than buying the tier a salesperson recommends.

ComponentWhat it establishesNotes on cost and speed
SSN traceIdentity and address history, which drives where else to searchCheap, instant, and the foundation of everything else
National criminal databaseA broad first-pass criminal background check across aggregated recordsInstant and inexpensive, but incomplete on its own
County criminal searchThe records that national databases frequently missWhere passthrough fees concentrate; can require a court runner
Federal criminal searchFederal offenses, which county courts do not holdUsually a higher tier; relevant for finance and senior roles
Sex offender registryRegistry listings across all statesStandard inclusion in most base packages
Employment verificationPast employer, title, and dates of employmentMost common cause of delay; depends on a third party replying
Education verificationDegrees, institutions, and datesSimilar delay profile to employment verification
Motor vehicle recordDriving history and license statusRequired for driving roles; priced per state
Drug testingSubstance screening, usually via a collection siteSeparate logistics and separate cost
Credit checkFinancial history, for finance-handling roles onlyRestricted by state law in several jurisdictions
Social media screeningPublic online activity, run by a compliant vendor rather than a managerReviewing profiles informally exposes protected characteristics

The component that matters most for accuracy is county criminal search. Most US criminal records live at county level, and national databases only contain what has been uploaded to them, so a database-only package will miss records in courts that do not report. That is the single biggest reason entry tiers at $29.99 are cheaper than the $59.99 tier that adds county coverage.

How far back a background check goes

What shows up on a background check is governed by lookback limits (how many years back a report may reach) that differ by record type, by state, and in some cases by the salary of the role. Getting this wrong in either direction is expensive: too deep and you are using information you were not entitled to consider, too shallow and you missed something relevant.

The federal baseline is section 605 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and the detail most people get backwards is that it does not cap criminal convictions. Under federal law convictions can be reported indefinitely. The seven-year restriction applies to other adverse items, and it lifts entirely for roles paying $75,000 or more a year.

Record typeFederal lookback under the FCRANotes
Criminal convictionsNo federal time limitReportable indefinitely unless a state law says otherwise
Records of arrestSeven years, or the statute of limitations if longerCalifornia and New York bar arrests that produced no conviction
Civil suits and judgmentsSeven years, or the statute of limitations if longerGrouped with arrests in the same subsection of the statute
Paid tax liensSeven years from the date of paymentUnpaid liens are treated differently
Collection accountsSeven yearsRelevant only where a credit component is included
BankruptciesTen years from the order for reliefLonger than the general seven-year rule
Salary exceptionLimits above do not apply at $75,000 or moreConvictions were already unlimited; this widens everything else

State law then adds its own limits in at least ten states. California, Colorado, Hawaii, Kansas, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, New York, Texas, and Washington all restrict how far back criminal history may reach, and the variations matter more than the seven-year headline most of them share.

Hawaii is the outlier in how it does that. Rather than capping what an agency may report, HRS 378-2.5 limits what an employer may consider to the most recent seven years for felony convictions and five years for misdemeanors, excluding periods of incarceration. Even then, the employer may consider those records only after a conditional offer, as the Hawaii Civil Rights Commission fact sheet sets out.

The salary exception does not travel
The federal $75,000 threshold that lifts the seven-year cap is not recognized in every state that sets its own limit. Texas and Maryland keep a $75,000 carve-out in their own statutes; Kansas and Washington lift their caps at $20,000; and Colorado, Massachusetts, and Montana have no employment carve-out. New York sets its threshold at $25,000, and also bars reporting an arrest unless it produced a conviction or the charge is still pending. California keeps no salary exception at all: Civil Code 1786.18 caps conviction reporting at seven years from disposition whatever the role pays. Running one uniform national lookback policy across every location is exactly the fact pattern that has produced litigation.

The practical consequence for a small employer is that the lookback is a per-state question rather than a company policy. A provider that is genuinely FCRA-compliant will apply the correct limit for the candidate's jurisdiction automatically, which is one of the concrete reasons to use a consumer reporting agency rather than searching court records yourself.

How to run a background check, step by step

Running a background check takes seven steps, and several of them are legally ordered rather than merely sensible, so the sequence is stricter than most first-time buyers expect. Doing them out of order is the most common compliance failure.

1
Decide what the role actually requires
Write down which components are justified for this position before you shop. A driving role needs a motor vehicle record (MVR); a bookkeeping role may justify a credit component; most roles need neither. Screening depth should follow the job, not the budget or habit.
2
Extend the conditional offer first
Ban-the-box laws, named for the conviction checkbox they remove from job applications, restrict when you may ask about or check criminal history in many states and cities, commonly pushing it after a conditional offer. Running a check too early in the process is a timing violation independent of anything in the report.
3
Provide a standalone disclosure
A separate written document stating that a consumer report will be obtained for employment purposes. Not part of the application, not part of the offer letter, and not combined with a liability waiver. This is the requirement courts have been strictest about.
4
Obtain written authorization
Signed consent from the candidate before anything is ordered. Under the federal E-SIGN Act an electronic signature has the same legal effect, provided the signed record can be kept and accurately reproduced. Keep the signed record; if the check is ever challenged, this document is the first thing anyone will ask for.
5
Order the check and wait properly
Providers quote one to five business days for a standard package. Do not treat a partial result as a final one, particularly while employment verification is still open, since that is what usually keeps a report in progress.
6
Review against the job, not in the abstract
Assess any finding against the requirements of the specific role. A blanket rule that any record disqualifies anyone is the position least likely to survive scrutiny.
7
Follow the adverse action sequence if needed
Pre-adverse action notice with a copy of the report and the summary of rights, a reasonable window for the candidate to dispute, then a final adverse action notice naming the agency. Compressing this is the most common and most expensive shortcut.

How fast a background check comes back

A fast background check depends mostly on which components you ordered, not on which provider you picked. Database components return instantly. Anything that needs a court clerk or a former employer to act runs on their schedule, not yours.

ComponentHow quickly it returnsWhat holds it up
SSN trace and identityInstant, it is a database lookupEffectively nothing
National criminal databaseInstant by designNothing, which is also why it is incomplete
Sex offender registryInstantNothing; it is a search across state registries
County criminal searchSame day where the court is onlineCourts with no electronic access need a runner in the building
Motor vehicle recordUsually same dayHow the individual state agency releases records
Employment verificationThe slowest routine componentA former employer or payroll database has to reply
Education verificationSimilar profile to employmentRegistrar response times, and closed or merged institutions
Drug testingStarts only once the sample is collectedThe candidate has to attend a collection site
International componentsThe longest item on any reportSeparate process and language in each country

Same day is realistic for a database-only package and unrealistic for anything touching a court or a previous employer. If speed is the binding constraint, order the instant components first and let the slower ones finish behind them, then ask each provider for median completion time in the states where you hire rather than the best case in the sales deck.

13 background check companies at a glance

There are hundreds of companies that do background checks in the US, but the same dozen names come up again and again when employers shop, and the shortlist for a background check for small business is shorter still.

The table below sorts them by the thing that most affects a small buyer: whether the price is published at all. Watch the ownership too, since two of the biggest names on this list are now part of other providers.

ProviderSegmentPublished pricingGlobal coverageEntry priceG2 rating
CheckrSMB to enterprise$29.99 per reportNot verified
GoodHireSMB to mid-market$29.99 per reportNot verified
CertnSMB, global$13.99 per check4.7 (200+)
First AdvantageEnterprise, global$29 SMB self-serveNot verified
iprospectcheckSMB to mid-market$34.95 per checkNot verified
BackgroundChecks.comSMB$29.99 per reportNot verified
Verified FirstMid-market$29.99 per reportNot verified
GCheckSMB and nonprofits$18.95 per check5.0 (11+)
HireRightMid to enterpriseQuote onlyNot verified
Sterling (now First Advantage)Enterprise, globalQuote onlyNot verified
Accurate BackgroundSMB to enterpriseQuote onlyNot verified
VICTIGMid-marketQuote only4.7 (500+)
CisiveSMB to enterpriseNo price listedNot verified
Entry prices are base package rates read from each vendor's own published rate card or signup portal in September 2026, before jurisdiction passthrough fees, which the cost section below sets out. The iprospectcheck figure is its rate below 25 checks a year; from 25 to 50 it drops to $24.95. BackgroundChecks.com's comparison pages quote $24.99 for a national criminal check, but its order portal charged $29.99 for the Basic Report, and that portal figure is the one shown. G2 ratings are out of 5, with review counts as floors, taken from the figure the vendor itself cites on its own site; where we could not read a current figure, the provider is marked Not verified rather than guessed at. Ownership note: Checkr owns GoodHire, First Advantage owns Sterling, and BackgroundChecks.com is HireRight's self-service brand, so those are related brands rather than independent alternatives.
Who owns whom
This market has consolidated, which matters when you are collecting quotes that look independent. Checkr acquired GoodHire's parent company, Inflection, in April 2022, and the two now publish an identical three-tier rate card, so quoting both is not quite the second opinion it appears to be. First Advantage completed its acquisition of Sterling Check on October 31, 2024 in a deal valued at $2.2 billion including assumed debt, ending Sterling's run as a separate public company, and Sterling's own site now says it is First Advantage. BackgroundChecks.com is the third one people miss: it describes itself as a HireRight company and runs as HireRight's self-service platform for small business.

How we evaluated these providers

Feature lists are near-identical in this category because the components are standardized. We applied five tests instead, identically to all thirteen.

Can you find out what it costs without a sales call?
Published rates were recorded as published and quote-only providers labeled as such rather than filled in with a guess. Eight of thirteen publish something; five do not. For a company running a dozen checks a year, pricing opacity alone is a reason to shortlist elsewhere.
What does a realistic invoice look like, not the base rate?
Base package rates were converted into an annual figure for a small business, then set against the access fees each provider publishes separately. Certn lists US county court fees from $0.20 to $98 and employment verification from $29.95 to $130.69; Checkr lists its own employment verification passthrough at $17.95 to $119.90. Those charges land on top of every advertised rate, and no vendor comparison we found puts the two numbers side by side.
Will they take a small account at all?
Several providers here are structured around enterprise volume, with quote processes, implementation, and account management that assume hundreds of checks a year. We noted where self-service signup exists and where a small buyer will be routed into a sales cycle disproportionate to the spend.
What does the FCRA workflow look like?
Because the compliance obligation sits with the employer, a provider that automates disclosure, authorization, and adverse action sequencing removes real risk. We noted which providers build that in rather than leaving it to you, since for a company without an HR function that is worth more than a few dollars per check.
Is the provider accredited and audited?
The industry credential to look for is PBSA accreditation from the Professional Background Screening Association, which audits providers against standards covering consumer protection, data security, legal compliance, and verification practices. It is voluntary, so its absence is not disqualifying, but its presence is meaningful third-party evidence. SOC 2 attestation and a published dispute and accuracy process are the other two signals worth asking about directly.
Still Using Spreadsheets for Onboarding?
Automate documents, training assignments, task management, and track onboarding progress in real time.
See How It Works

Providers that publish a price

For a small business this is the group worth starting with, because you can budget without a sales conversation and sign up without a volume commitment.

Checkr
Best overall for published pricing and integration breadth
Pricing: Basic $29.99, Essential $59.99, Complete $94.99 per report; enterprise pricing by quoteG2: No current rating we could verify directlyBest for: Companies wanting transparent per-report pricing with deep ATS integration

Checkr publishes a full rate card, which alone puts it ahead of most of this market for a small buyer. Basic at $29.99 covers SSN trace, national criminal, sex offender registry, and global watchlist. Essential at $59.99 adds unlimited county criminal searches, which is where the majority of US criminal records actually sit.

Complete at $94.99 sits on top of those two, adding unlimited state criminal and a federal search. The platform wrapped around all three tiers carries over 200 ATS and HRIS integrations, an AI-assisted adjudication layer, and continuous monitoring priced at $1.70 per person per month for anyone you enroll in it.

Two caveats. The $29.99 tier relies on aggregated national databases, which miss records from courts that do not report, so it is thinner than the price suggests for roles where criminal history genuinely matters. And there is no published volume threshold at which the rate card improves: anything beyond the three tiers is an enterprise quote, so a company running a dozen checks a year pays list.

Pros
Publishes a full per-report rate card, rare in this category
Over 200 ATS and HRIS integrations
Self-service signup without a volume commitment
Built-in FCRA adjudication and adverse action workflow
Cons
Entry tier is database-only and misses non-reporting county courts
No published volume discount, so a small buyer always pays list
Court and database access fees are excluded from the published rate
Adjudication filtering beyond the basic level costs $2.49 to $4 a report
GoodHire
Best candidate experience for small business hiring
Pricing: Basic $29.99, Essential $59.99, Complete $94.99 per check; above 50 checks a year, a custom quoteG2: No current rating we could verify directlyBest for: Small employers who want a polished candidate-facing process

GoodHire's case rests on the candidate side. Candidates see their results in the same simple, mobile-optimized format the employer gets, which cuts the volume of chasing emails a hiring manager fields. On the employer side, the built-in adverse action workflow is designed to account for federal, state, and local rules automatically rather than leaving them to a checklist.

It is a Checkr company, so quoting both is not an independent comparison, and it publishes no integration count to set against Checkr's 200-plus. The published Basic, Essential, and Complete rates match its parent's to the cent, and its pricing page sends accounts running more than 50 checks a year to a custom quote instead of the preset card.

That candidate experience earns its place at a small business where the hiring manager is also the person answering candidate questions. Chasing status updates is unpaid work that lands on whoever made the offer, and the candidate-facing results view absorbs most of it before it reaches an inbox.

Pros
Candidate-facing results view reduces status-chasing overhead
Automated adverse action workflow that accounts for state and local rules
Published pricing with self-service signup
Same rate card as Checkr, from $29.99
Cons
Owned by Checkr, so not an independent second quote
Volume pricing above 50 checks a year only through a custom quote
No published integration count, unlike Checkr's 200-plus
Same access fee exposure as every provider here
Certn
Cheapest published entry price and 200-plus-country reach
Pricing: US Core $13.99, Complete $49.99, Complete+ $79.99 per check, pay as you go, plus access feesG2: 4.7 out of 5 from more than 200 reviews, the figure Certn itself citesBest for: Remote-first teams and companies hiring contractors internationally

Certn has the lowest published entry price in this comparison. By its own count it screens in more than 200 countries and territories, a reach Checkr and First Advantage also claim, and it adds instant identity verification and an API for teams that want to embed checks in their own flow. Paying per check, with no setup fees or minimums, suits companies hiring irregularly.

The $13.99 Core check adds $9.99 for every county search it triggers, so a check comparable to Checkr Essential costs more than the headline implies. Alongside Checkr, Certn is one of two providers here that publish their access fees jurisdiction by jurisdiction (BackgroundChecks.com flags county surcharges at checkout instead), which is worth more at budgeting time than a few dollars off the base rate.

For a distributed team hiring across borders, it is the most practical option here. The trade-off is scale. Certn is a smaller vendor than the US incumbents, with correspondingly less market presence and no published integration count, so confirm your ATS is on its list before assuming the integration work is done for you.

Pros
Lowest published entry price in this comparison
Very broad international coverage for contractor screening
Pay-as-you-go with no volume commitment
High G2 rating with a meaningful review base
Cons
Each county search the $13.99 Core check triggers adds $9.99
Smaller vendor with less US market presence than the incumbents
No published integration count to set against Checkr's 200-plus
Employment and education verification access fees billed per source on top of the card
First Advantage
Global scale with small business self-service
Pricing: Small business self-serve from $29 in its signup portal, no setup fee; enterprise by quoteG2: No current rating we could verify directlyBest for: Companies needing global coverage that also want an accessible entry point

First Advantage runs more than 200 million screens a year across over 200 countries and territories by its own count, a footprint that grew again when it completed its $2.2 billion acquisition of Sterling Check in October 2024.

Unusually for a company that size, First Advantage offers small business self-service from $29 per check with no account setup fee and no minimum volume, which makes it accessible to buyers the other enterprise providers route to sales.

The small business route is a separate signup portal with four packages. Basic at $29 covers an SSN trace, the national criminal database, and sex offender registries; Standard at $44 adds a county criminal search; Choice at $65 adds global sanctions and a seven-year county search; and Premium at $75 adds a driver's license check.

First Advantage's main site lists none of those prices, and its own help center says a check can run from under $50 to several hundred dollars. At the bottom of the range, though, the enterprise brand is not the expensive option: the portal's $29 entry package sits just under Checkr's $29.99.

Pros
More than 200 million screens a year, by its own count
Coverage across more than 200 countries and territories
Small business packages from $29 with no account setup fee
Pay-as-you-go accessible without a custom quote
Cons
Small business prices appear only in the signup portal, not on the main site
The $29 Basic package stops at the national database, with no county search
Separate portals for small business and enterprise accounts
Now also owns Sterling, so the two are not independent quotes
iprospectcheck
Best transparent tiered pricing for mid-market hiring
Pricing: Basic $34.95, Standard $59.95, Premium $89.95 per check below 25 checks a year; $24.95, $49.95, and $79.95 from 25 to 50; above 50 by quoteG2: No rating we could verify directlyBest for: Companies running enough volume to reach discount thresholds sooner

iprospectcheck splits buyers into three bands, 1 to 25 checks a year, 25 to 50, and 50 or more, and publishes a rate card for the first two. Below 25 checks it charges $34.95 for Basic, $59.95 for Standard, and $89.95 for Premium, so its entry tier costs more than Checkr's $29.99 Basic while its top tier costs less than Checkr's $94.99 Complete.

iprospectcheck's middle band is where it undercuts Checkr and GoodHire at every comparable level: $24.95 against $29.99 at entry, $49.95 against $59.99 for the mid tier, and $79.95 against $94.99 at the top. Above 50 checks it quotes. Employment verification and clinical screening are areas it emphasizes.

It is a considerably smaller operation than the names above, with less independent review coverage and a narrower integration ecosystem, so ask for references from existing customers; they matter more here than with the incumbents. For a company that hires regularly but not at enterprise volume, its pricing structure is a better fit than the majors'.

Pros
Undercuts the major providers at every tier from 25 checks a year
Publishes its card openly rather than routing buyers to sales
Volume bands are stated up front, so you know which one you land in
Strong emphasis on employment verification and clinical screening
Cons
No G2 rating we could verify directly
Much smaller operation with limited independent review coverage
Narrower integration ecosystem than the incumbents
Reference checks matter more than with the established names
BackgroundChecks.com
Low-cost per-check option for occasional hiring
Pricing: Basic $29.99, County $39.99, Complete $44.99 per reportG2: No rating we could verify directlyBest for: Small businesses hiring a handful of people a year

BackgroundChecks.com is HireRight's self-service screening platform for small business, and it offers straightforward per-report pricing from $29.99 covering criminal searches, motor vehicle records, drug testing, and verifications. Its Complete Report, with a seven-year county criminal search, costs $44.99. The proposition is simplicity: no contract, no minimum, published price, and enough coverage for standard non-regulated hiring.

One pricing wrinkle: BackgroundChecks.com's own comparison pages quote $24.99 for a national criminal check, but its order portal charged $29.99 for the Basic Report when we checked in September 2026. Budget on the portal figure, since that is the price checkout bills.

It is a volume-oriented commodity service rather than a hiring platform, and depth costs extra. Its Professional Report, which adds education and employment verifications and a federal criminal search, costs $76.99, and county searches can carry jurisdiction surcharges on top of the package price. For a business hiring four or five people a year and handling the paperwork manually, the entry price is right.

Pros
Seven-year county package at $44.99, under Checkr's $59.99 county tier
No contract or minimum volume commitment
Covers criminal, MVR, drug testing, and verifications
Backed by an established screening group
Cons
Court access fees billed separately from the report price
The Professional package with verifications costs $76.99
No G2 rating we could verify directly
Commodity service rather than a hiring platform
Verified First
Best for deep ATS integration at no connection cost
Pricing: Basic $29.99, Essential $54.99, Premium $79.99 per report; enterprise by quoteG2: No current rating we could verify directlyBest for: Teams already committed to an ATS and wanting screening inside it

Verified First built its positioning around integration: connecting to HR and applicant tracking systems quickly and without charging for the connection, which is a real differentiator given how often integration work becomes a line item elsewhere. Its published ladder runs Basic $29.99, Essential $54.99, and Premium $79.99, with no long-term contract, no annual commitment, and no minimum screening volume.

We could not verify a current G2 rating for it, which leaves less independent evidence to weigh than for Certn or VICTIG, and signup starts with a contact form rather than an instant online account. The proposition is strongest if you already run an ATS it connects to and integration friction is what has stalled previous evaluations.

Pros
Integration to HR and ATS systems at no connection cost
Middle and top tiers undercut Checkr at $54.99 and $79.99
No contract, annual commitment, or minimum screening volume
Focused proposition rather than a broad platform
Cons
No current G2 rating we could verify directly
Signup starts with a contact form, not an instant online account
Less market presence than the established providers
Value depends heavily on already running a supported ATS
County criminal search included at the entry price
Pricing: Basic $18.95, Standard $39.95, Advanced $49.95 per check; volume pricing and nonprofit discounts by custom quoteG2: 5.0 from 23 reviewsBest for: Employers and nonprofits that want county-level coverage at the entry price point

GCheck’s entry tier undercuts the $29.99 database-only tiers common in this category while including the county criminal search that several providers here only add at $40 to $60. Basic at $18.95 combines a current-county criminal search with the SSN trace, national criminal database, sex offender registry, and OFAC/OIG/global watchlist screening. Standard at $39.95 extends county search to a candidate’s full address history and adds biometric identity verification; Advanced at $49.95 adds a federal criminal search.

Beyond screening, GCheck has built-in FCRA disclosure and adverse action workflows, 60+ ATS and HRIS integrations, and a wider catalog covering employment and education verification, drug testing, MVRs, international checks, and I-9/E-Verify, with a 12–24 hour average turnaround. Like most providers in this comparison, the published rate is a base price: GCheck states that additional third-party fees may apply and are passed through at cost, but it doesn’t publish a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction fee schedule the way some other providers here do.

Pros
County criminal search included at $18.95, below the database-only entry tiers of several providers here
No setup fees, minimums, or long-term contracts
SOC 2 Type II attested, with a HIPAA compliance program and built-in FCRA workflows
Customer service handled by real people, not a chatbot or ticket queue
Cons
No published jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction access fee schedule
Unlimited-county coverage and federal criminal search require Standard or Advanced, not Basic
Nonprofit and volume rates are by custom quote rather than published, with deeper rates for organizations serving vulnerable populations
Background screening only, not a broader HR or onboarding system: pairs with a dedicated onboarding tool rather than replacing one

Quote-only and enterprise providers

These providers are built around volume, regulated industries, and global coverage. None of them publishes a price, and outside Accurate's small business program and Cisive's self-service tier, a small buyer should expect a sales process out of proportion to the spend.

HireRight
Best for regulated transport and high-volume hiring
Pricing: Quote only; its self-service brand BackgroundChecks.com publishes from $29.99G2: No current rating we could verify directlyBest for: Transportation, trucking, and organizations with DOT obligations

HireRight is one of the long-established global screening providers, and its concentration in transportation and trucking is not accidental: hiring regulated by the Department of Transportation (DOT) has specific screening and drug testing requirements, and HireRight handles them as a core competence rather than an add-on. Form I-9 and employment eligibility services sit alongside the screening product, and it lists more than 70 ATS and HCM integrations.

The enterprise product is quote-only, and every route into it starts with a sales conversation. A small buyer who wants HireRight coverage without the sales cycle should look at BackgroundChecks.com instead, which is the same group selling self-service. For regulated transport hiring at volume, the enterprise product is a serious contender.

Pros
Deep DOT and transportation screening capability
Form I-9 and employment eligibility handled alongside screening
Global coverage with a long operating history
More than 70 ATS and HCM integrations, by its own count
Cons
Quote only, with no published rate card
Enterprise sales process disproportionate to small volumes
No current G2 rating we could verify directly
Value concentrated in regulated hiring rather than general use
Sterling (now First Advantage)
Best for regulated and multinational screening at scale
Pricing: Quote only, with no published rate cardG2: No current rating we could verify directly under the First Advantage brandBest for: Large regulated employers with international hiring

Sterling brings large-scale database coverage and depth in regulated sectors including healthcare and financial services, with international capability across many jurisdictions. Since the First Advantage acquisition closed on October 31, 2024, it has traded as part of that group rather than as a separate public company.

The brand itself is being folded in as well. Sterling's own site now reads "Sterling is now First Advantage," so a Sterling quote and a First Advantage quote come from the same company, whichever name sits on the proposal.

Pricing is opaque even by this category's standards, with no rate card published anywhere on the vendor's site and no entry point stated for a small account. We could not verify a current G2 rating under either name, so there is less current evidence to read than for the SMB-focused providers. This is an enterprise product; a small business evaluating it has almost certainly been routed to the wrong tier.

Pros
Large-scale database coverage across many jurisdictions
Strong depth in healthcare and financial services screening
Established international capability
Backed by a group running more than 200 million screens a year
Cons
Quote only, with no published rate card or stated entry point
Now part of First Advantage, so not an independent alternative
Little current independent review data under the new ownership
Enterprise-oriented with little to offer a small buyer
Accurate Background
Best for healthcare compliance and sanctions screening
Pricing: Quote only; small business accounts with no monthly fees or minimumsG2: No current rating we could verify directlyBest for: Healthcare employers needing OIG exclusion and sanctions checks

Accurate Background differentiates on healthcare compliance, including checks against the HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) exclusion list and National Practitioner Data Bank searches, which the general-purpose providers treat as add-ons. It also runs a small business program with no monthly fees or minimums, and its own site says support is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Pricing is quote-only, which is the same barrier the rest of this group presents; even the small business page ends in a contact form rather than a rate card. For a healthcare employer with sanctions screening obligations, the specialization is real and the general providers do not match it.

Pros
Healthcare license, sanctions, and exclusion checks as a core line
OIG exclusion and National Practitioner Data Bank searches built in
Support available around the clock, per its own site
Small business accounts with no monthly fees or minimums
Cons
Quote only with no published entry point
No current G2 rating we could verify directly
Healthcare specialization is wasted on general hiring
Sales process required even for small accounts
VICTIG
Strongest verified rating and review volume in this comparison
Pricing: Quote onlyG2: 4.7 out of 5 from more than 500 reviews, the figure VICTIG itself citesBest for: Teams that want a responsive partner rather than a self-service portal

VICTIG posts the strongest combination of rating and review volume among the providers we could verify here, and it bills itself as the top-rated provider in the G2 background check services category. It covers the standard component set, including criminal searches, drug testing, education and employment verification, and motor vehicle reports, with ATS integration partners and a background check API.

Pricing is quote-only, which is the one thing keeping it out of the published-price group above. If service quality rather than self-service speed is what has gone wrong for you with a previous provider, the rating evidence here is the strongest we could verify on this page.

Pros
4.7 on G2 from more than 500 reviews, the figure it cites
Health sanctions and employment credit checks in the standard menu
ATS integration partners plus a background check API
Client support positioned as the core of the offer
Cons
Quote only, with no published entry price
Less brand recognition than the major incumbents
Requires a sales conversation before you can budget
Smaller scale than the global providers for international hiring
Cisive
Best for healthcare and transportation compliance depth
Pricing: No published pricing; custom enterprise programs plus a self-service tierG2: No rating we could verify directlyBest for: Highly regulated hiring where screening depth outweighs cost

Cisive, with its PreCheck healthcare division, targets employers where a bad hire carries regulatory rather than merely commercial consequences: healthcare, transportation, financial services, and similar. Its positioning is quality of screening over speed and price, with programs built around specific regulatory frameworks and I-9 services alongside.

Cisive publishes no prices anywhere, not even for its self-service tier. Its enterprise programs are custom, and Cisive Self-Service, built for small to midsize organizations, lets an account order individual searches or pre-built packages without a long onboarding. A small general-purpose employer will still find most of the depth irrelevant. For a regulated employer, the specialization is the point.

Pros
Deep regulatory specialization in healthcare and transportation
PreCheck division dedicated to healthcare screening
I-9 and employment eligibility services included
Program design around specific regulatory frameworks
Cons
No published pricing at all, even for self-service
Limited independent review data available
Enterprise programs still require a custom build
Depth is wasted outside regulated hiring

Industry and state requirements

Some sectors carry screening obligations set by regulation rather than by preference, and in those cases the package is largely decided for you. Everywhere else, depth is a judgment call about the role.

SectorWhat is typically requiredProvider implication
HealthcareOIG exclusion and sanctions screening, license verification, often drug testingAccurate Background and Cisive specialize; general providers treat it as an add-on
Transportation and truckingDOT-mandated screening, drug and alcohol testing, driving recordsHireRight is the incumbent for DOT-regulated hiring
Financial servicesCredit history where permitted, federal criminal, regulatory sanctionsDeeper tiers required; credit checks restricted in several states
Childcare and educationChild abuse registry checks, fingerprinting, often state-run systemsFrequently handled through a state program rather than a commercial CRA
Volunteers and nonprofitsSame FCRA duties as paid staff when a CRA is usedDiscounted nonprofit rates are common but rarely advertised
General office and retailIdentity, criminal at county level, employment verificationAny published-price provider covers this adequately

Three cases change what you pay rather than how you run the process, and healthcare is the first. Employers who hire someone on the HHS Office of Inspector General exclusion list are exposed to civil monetary penalties.

The OIG tells healthcare entities to check the list routinely rather than once at hire, with state Medicaid agencies directed to do it monthly. That is why sanctions screening for nursing and clinical roles is sold as a subscription instead of a one-off search.

Volunteers and contractors are the second. Providers apply the same disclosure and authorization workflow to both, so treating a volunteer screening or a contractor check as exempt from the FCRA steps is a risk with no upside. Nonprofit rates are commonly available and rarely advertised, so ask rather than waiting to be offered one.

Executive hires are the third. The components that matter at that level (federal criminal, credit where the role controls money, and verification of directorships and credentials) sit above the standard package, so an executive background check is a different order rather than the same one run more carefully.

On the state side, four things vary enough to change your process: lookback limits, whether non-conviction records may be reported at all, ban-the-box timing rules that dictate when you may ask, and restrictions on credit checks for roles that do not handle money.

California, New York, and Illinois each impose meaningful overlays, and several cities add their own on top of the state rule. If you hire in more than one state, build the process around the strictest applicable requirement rather than maintaining separate workflows.

Driver, DOT, and MVR screening

Hiring a commercial driver is the one case where federal rules set the package for you. A motor vehicle record is the starting point, and for drivers operating under Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) rules, two further obligations sit alongside it, both with their own paperwork.

Before a driver performs a safety-sensitive function you must run a pre-employment full query of the FMCSA Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse, and a full query needs the driver's specific consent first (49 CFR 382.701).

You must also request the driving record from every state where the driver has held a license in the past three years, and investigate their safety performance history with DOT-regulated employers across those same three years, with the results filed within 30 days of the employment start date (49 CFR 391.23).

None of that applies to driving that needs no commercial driver's license (CDL): delivery routes, service calls, and anyone who takes a company vehicle out occasionally. There a motor vehicle record on its own is usually the right scope. Order it per state, since the record follows the licensing authority rather than the person, and re-run it on a schedule where driving is a condition of the job.

Free and instant background checks

There is no legitimate free background check for hiring. The free and instant services you will find are people-search sites, and using one to make a hiring decision is a compliance problem rather than a saving.

What people mean by freeWhat it actually isWhether you can hire on it
Free people-search sitesConsumer data aggregators that explicitly disclaim FCRA complianceNo; using them for employment decisions violates the FCRA
Free court record searchesPublic records you look up yourself, jurisdiction by jurisdictionLegally possible but unverified, inconsistent, and undocumented
Free trials from CRAsA small number of checks at no cost to evaluate the platformYes, and worth using to test turnaround before committing
Instant checksDatabase-only searches returning in minutesYes, but incomplete; national databases miss non-reporting county courts

The distinction that matters is whether the provider operates as a consumer reporting agency. People-search sites state in their own terms that their data may not be used for employment screening, precisely so they fall outside FCRA obligations.

An employer who hires from a people-search result anyway has no dispute process to offer the candidate, no accuracy standard behind the data, and no defense if the decision is challenged. The saving is real but small: base checks start under $30, which is less than an hour of the time spent doing it badly.

Instant is a different matter. Instant checks are genuine and useful, but instant means database-only, and aggregated databases contain only what jurisdictions have uploaded to them. That is the same limitation that makes $29.99 entry tiers thinner than they look. Instant is a good first pass and a poor final answer for a role where criminal history is genuinely material.

What a background check really costs

Every published rate in this category is a base package price. What lands on the invoice includes jurisdiction access fees that vary by county and are added after the fact, and this is the single largest gap between what buyers budget and what they pay.

PackageBase per check12 checks, base onlyWhat the tier buys
Certn US Core Criminal$13.99$168Adds $9.99 for each county search it triggers; Complete sits at $49.99 and Complete+ at $79.99
GCheck Basic$18.95$227Includes a current-county criminal search; Standard at $39.95 searches every county of residence
Checkr Basic$29.99$360National database only; misses records from courts that do not report
GoodHire Basic$29.99$360The same three-tier ladder as Checkr, its parent company
BackgroundChecks.com Basic$29.99$360HireRight's self-service SMB brand; no contract and no minimum volume
iprospectcheck Basic$34.95$419The rate below 25 checks a year; from 25 to 50 it drops to $24.95, and above 50 the company quotes
Checkr Essential$59.99$720Adds unlimited county criminal, where most US records actually live
Checkr Complete$94.99$1,140Adds unlimited state criminal and a federal criminal search
Modeled on a small business running 12 checks a year. Base rates were read from each vendor's own published rate card in September 2026 and cover the package only. Court, database, and verification access fees are billed separately on top of every row here, and the section below sets out the amounts the providers publish for them.
Access fees are the number nobody quotes
Court and database access charges are jurisdiction-dependent. Certn and Checkr publish full schedules, while BackgroundChecks.com flags county surcharges at checkout. Certn lists US county court fees for about 26 states, from $0.20 in Utah to $98 in some New York counties, with every other listed state between $0.50 and $40, plus employment verification at $29.95 to $130.69 and education verification at $10 to $50. Checkr lists employment verification passthrough fees at $17.95 to $119.90, education verification at $3.95 to $50, and DOT verification at $7 to $70. Both say the charge reaches your invoice at cost with no markup, so the variable you control is which jurisdictions your hiring touches.

Those schedules explain why two invoices for the same package can differ by more than the package costs. A Utah county search adds $0.20; the same search in the most expensive New York counties adds $98. Ask each provider what its fees average across accounts hiring in your states before you sign.

Package depth is the other lever, and it moves cost far more than vendor choice does. Going from a database-only tier to one that includes county criminal doubles the base rate at Checkr and GoodHire, from $29.99 to $59.99. That is the right call for a role handling money or vulnerable people and unnecessary depth for many others.

Companies Using FirstHR Onboard 3x Faster
Join hundreds of small businesses who transformed their new hire experience.
See It in Action

Post-hire and continuous monitoring

Continuous monitoring re-screens existing employees on an ongoing basis and alerts you when a new record appears, rather than taking a single snapshot at hire. Checkr prices it at $1.70 per person per month, and most major providers now offer some version.

The case for it is strongest where a license or clean driving record is a condition of the job: a delivery driver whose license is suspended in March is a liability you would otherwise discover at the next annual check, or not at all. Healthcare is the clearest regulated case, since the OIG expects current employees, not only new hires, to be checked against its exclusion list.

The case against it for a general small business is cost and proportionality. At $1.70 per person monthly, a thirty-person company pays around $612 a year to monitor staff for events that are rare and mostly irrelevant to the work they actually do.

Monitoring also carries the same FCRA obligations as a pre-hire check, including disclosure and the adverse action sequence if you act on a result, and it changes the employment relationship in a way worth being deliberate about. Enroll the roles where a record would genuinely change the job, not the whole payroll by default.

Employment verification within a background check

An employment verification background check is not a separate product: employment verification is a component of a standard check. It is worth separating because it behaves differently from the rest of the report, and because background check employment verification is where most of the delay in a hire actually accumulates. It is the slowest part, the part most dependent on someone else, and the part employers most often try to do themselves.

1
Candidate supplies the history
Employer names, job titles, and dates of employment, usually captured on the application or in the screening portal.
2
The provider contacts the source
Either the former employer directly, or a commercial database that aggregates payroll records from participating companies.
3
The former employer responds
Many now confirm only dates and job title as a matter of policy, because saying more creates defamation exposure. Do not expect a performance assessment.
4
Discrepancies are flagged
A gap between what the candidate stated and what the employer confirms is reported to you. Small date discrepancies are common and rarely meaningful; title inflation and invented roles are not.
5
You decide, under FCRA rules
If a verification discrepancy contributes to rejecting the candidate, the pre-adverse and adverse action sequence applies exactly as it would for a criminal record.

Education and credential verification

Education verification confirms the degree, the institution, and the dates. Credential verification confirms that a license or certification is real and current. Both are ordered as components of the same report, and both earn their place on any role where a qualification is the reason you are hiring at all.

Two things go wrong. Institutions that closed or merged make records slow to retrieve rather than impossible, and degree mills issue documents that look correct until someone checks the accrediting body. A provider verifies with the registrar or a central clearinghouse rather than against the certificate a candidate emailed you, which is the whole point of ordering it.

For licensed roles, verify against the state board that issued the license rather than a copy of the license itself, and check both that it exists and that it has not lapsed. The second is the more common problem, and it is the one that matters if the job legally requires the credential to stay current.

Doing employment verification yourself is legitimate, and many small employers do it, but note the asymmetry: an informal reference call is not a consumer report and is not covered by the FCRA, whereas the same information obtained through a provider is. Mixing the two inconsistently across candidates is where discrimination exposure creeps in.

FCRA compliance is the employer's obligation, not the vendor's

This is the part that catches small employers, because the intuition is wrong. The provider compiles the report and is regulated as a consumer reporting agency, but the disclosure, consent, and adverse action duties belong to you. A good provider automates the sequence; the legal responsibility does not transfer with it.

StepWhat is requiredWhere it goes wrong
DisclosureA standalone written notice that a background check will be obtained for employment purposesBurying it in the application or offer letter, which breaks the standalone requirement
AuthorizationWritten consent from the candidate before the check is runRunning the check before consent is on file, or relying on verbal agreement
Pre-adverse actionA copy of the report and a summary of rights, sent before any decision is finalizedRejecting the candidate first and sending paperwork afterward
Waiting periodA reasonable window for the candidate to dispute inaccuraciesMoving to a final decision immediately after the pre-adverse notice
Adverse action noticeFinal notice naming the agency and stating the candidate's rightsNever sending it, or omitting the agency details
State overlaysAdditional consent and timing rules in California, New York, Illinois, and othersApplying a single national process to a multi-state workforce

Two rules do most of the work. The first is that the disclosure must be its own document: the FCRA requires one that consists solely of the disclosure, and the Ninth Circuit held in Syed v. M-I (2017) that adding a liability waiver to it is a willful violation.

The second is the adverse action sequence, which exists to give the candidate a chance to correct a wrong record before losing the job, so compressing it is both the most common shortcut and the most expensive one. Ban-the-box laws add timing restrictions on when criminal history can be asked about at all, which vary by city as well as state.

The waiting period is the step nobody can pin down, because the statute does not pin it down either. The FCRA names no number of days between the pre-adverse notice and the final one, and the FTC guidance for employers using consumer reports sets out the sequence without setting a clock.

FTC staff called five business days reasonable in a 1997 advisory opinion, which is why it is the floor most practitioners work from. Some state and city fair chance laws set their own response windows on top of that, so check the local rule before you start counting days.

This is general information, not legal advice
FCRA requirements, state overlays, and ban-the-box timing rules change and vary by jurisdiction, including at city level. Confirm your obligations with employment counsel in every state where you hire before you build a screening process, and revisit it when you start hiring somewhere new.

Handling a negative result

A check comes back with a record. There is no fixed list of what disqualifies a candidate, and that is the point: what you may lawfully do next is governed by more than the FCRA, because Title VII discrimination law also applies, and the EEOC has published guidance on exactly this situation.

The core principle from the EEOC enforcement guidance on arrest and conviction records, issued in April 2012, is that blanket exclusions rarely hold up. The guidance says an automatic, across-the-board exclusion for any criminal conduct is inconsistent with the Green factors, the three tests in the table below. Criminal records are not evenly distributed across demographic groups, so a blanket rule produces disparate impact without a job-related justification.

The federal enforcement posture has shifted since. The Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel concluded on June 9, 2026 that the EEOC's disparate-impact guidelines are unconstitutional. That opinion lacks the force of law, though: the Title VII disparate-impact provision is unchanged, and the 2012 guidance is still posted.

The three Green factorsThe question to answerWhy it matters
Nature and gravity of the offenseWhat was it, and what were the circumstances?A property offense and a violent offense are not equivalent inputs
Time since the offense or the end of the sentenceHow long ago, and what has happened since?A decade-old record is weaker evidence of current risk than a recent one
Nature of the jobIs there a tight nexus between the offense and the duties?A fraud conviction is relevant to a finance role and largely not to a warehouse one

Where a targeted screen flags someone, the guidance recommends an individualized assessment: tell the candidate they may be excluded because of the record, give them a genuine opportunity to explain the circumstances or show the record is inaccurate, and actually consider what they provide before deciding. Relevant additional context includes rehabilitation, employment history since the offense, age at the time, and references.

Write the policy before you need it
Employment lawyers are consistent on this point: a written policy setting out which record types are disqualifying for which roles, and how the assessment is conducted, is the strongest evidence you have if a decision is ever challenged. It also forces consistency, which is what prevents the same record producing different outcomes for different candidates. The guidance is not itself law and does not require an individualized assessment for every role, since some exclusions have an obvious nexus, but a documented process is what distinguishes a defensible decision from an instinctive one.

Before you choose a provider

A background check is one step in a sequence, and the steps either side of it are where small employers most often lose time. Screening sits between the offer and the start date, and it produces documents that have to be collected, signed, and kept.

Hiring stepWho handles itWhat it produces
Offer acceptedYouSigned offer letter
FCRA disclosure and authorizationYou, before the check runsA standalone signed document you must retain
Background checkThe screening providerThe report, and an adverse action trail if used
Form I-9 and work authorizationYou, within three business days of startCompleted I-9 with retention obligations
Onboarding paperwork and policiesYouW-4, handbook acknowledgment, signed policies
First week and trainingYouCompletion records

The pattern is that the provider owns one row and you own the rest. For a company without an HR function, the screening decision is usually the easy part; assembling signatures, storing them where they can be produced later, and doing it consistently for every hire is where the actual work sits.

Where FirstHR fits, and where it does not
FirstHR does not run background checks and is not a consumer reporting agency. For screening itself, the providers compared above are the answer and nothing here substitutes for them. What it covers is the rest of that table: e-signature for the standalone FCRA disclosure and authorization, document storage with retention, I-9 and new hire paperwork, policy acknowledgments, and onboarding task workflows, at a flat $98 to $198 per month. The practical setup for many small employers is a screening provider for the check and an onboarding platform for everything around it.

How to choose a background check company

Six questions narrow this faster than any feature comparison, and the first one eliminates most of the market for a small buyer.

Will they publish a price and take you without a commitment?
If you run a dozen checks a year, a quote-only provider means a sales cycle, a contract negotiation, and an account manager for a few hundred dollars of annual spend. Checkr, GoodHire, Certn, First Advantage, iprospectcheck, BackgroundChecks.com, Verified First, and GCheck all publish rates, and all but Verified First and GCheck, which start with a contact form, offer instant self-service signup. Start there unless a regulatory requirement forces you elsewhere.
What is the realistic per-check cost including access fees?
Ask every provider for the average total invoice per check across accounts like yours, in the states where you hire, not the base package rate. Certn and Checkr publish their access fee schedules, which is the benchmark to hold the others to: US county court fees from $0.20 to $98, and employment verification passthrough from $17.95 at Checkr to $130.69 at Certn. A provider that cannot or will not answer the averages question is telling you something useful about how the relationship will run.
Does the package match the role, or just the budget?
Database-only entry tiers miss records from county courts that do not report, which is most of where US criminal records live. For a role handling money, vulnerable people, or driving, county coverage is not optional. For many other roles it is unnecessary depth. Price the package per role type rather than buying one tier for everyone.
Does it automate the FCRA sequence?
Disclosure, authorization, pre-adverse action with report and summary of rights, a dispute window, then the final notice. A provider that sequences this automatically removes real risk for a company without HR staff. One that hands you a PDF and wishes you luck has left the hardest part with you.
Are they PBSA accredited, and what is their dispute rate?
Ask for PBSA accreditation status, SOC 2 attestation, and how disputes are handled: who investigates, how long it takes, and what proportion of reports get disputed. A provider that tracks and shares that number is telling you something about its accuracy discipline. Accuracy failures in this category are not abstract, since a wrong record costs a candidate a job and costs you a legal problem.
What is the median turnaround, not the best case?
Every provider quotes the instant database component. Ask for median time to completed report in the states where you hire, and ask specifically how they handle counties with no electronic court access. Employment verification is usually the long pole because it depends on a former employer replying.

One closing note: get at least two quotes, and check ownership before assuming they are independent. Checkr and GoodHire are one company, and Sterling is part of First Advantage, so a shortlist of four names can easily be a shortlist of two.

Key Takeaways
Eight of the thirteen providers here publish a price and five do not. For a small business running a dozen checks a year, pricing transparency and self-service signup matter more than any feature difference.
Published base rates start at $13.99 (Certn US Core), with $29.99 the common small business entry point at Checkr, GoodHire, Verified First, and BackgroundChecks.com.
Court and database access fees are billed on top of every published rate, running from $0.20 for a Utah county search to $98 in some New York counties, and up to $130.69 for an employment verification.
Entry tiers are usually database-only and miss records from county courts that do not report, which is where most US criminal records sit. At Checkr and GoodHire the tier that adds county criminal costs roughly double, and it is the right call for sensitive roles.
FCRA obligations belong to the employer, not the provider: a standalone written disclosure, written authorization, pre-adverse action with a copy of the report, a dispute window, and a final adverse action notice.
Check ownership before treating quotes as independent. Checkr owns GoodHire, and First Advantage acquired Sterling in 2024, so a four-name shortlist may be two companies.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are employee background check services?

Consumer reporting agencies that verify a candidate's history for an employer before hiring. A standard check confirms identity through an SSN trace, searches criminal records at national, state, and county level, and verifies past employment and education. Driving records, drug testing, credit history, and license verification are optional additions. Because the reports inform hiring decisions, providers are regulated under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which places specific disclosure and consent obligations on the employer.

How much does an employee background check cost?

Published base rates begin near $14 per check. Certn starts at $13.99 and GCheck at $18.95 with a current-county search included, while Checkr, GoodHire, Verified First, and BackgroundChecks.com all open at $29.99, and Checkr and GoodHire step to $59.99 and then $94.99. What catches buyers out is the access fees billed on top: a county court search costs $0.20 in Utah and up to $98 in some New York counties, and an employment verification can reach $130.69.

What is the difference between a background check and background verification?

In the United States they describe the same activity, but the phrasing signals a different market. Background check and pre-employment screening are the standard US terms, governed by the FCRA. Background verification is the phrasing dominant in India and among global outsourcing providers, so searches for background verification companies or a background verification company surface largely Indian providers. If you hire in the US, search on background check and evaluate on FCRA compliance.

How long does a background check take?

Providers quote one to five business days for a standard check, with instant database searches returning in minutes. Delays come from anything needing a human: county courts without electronic access require a runner, and employment verification depends on a former employer replying, which is the most common reason a check sits open for a week. International checks take longest. Ask for median turnaround rather than best case.

What are the best background check companies for small business?

The decisive factor is whether the provider publishes a price and takes you without a volume commitment. On that basis Checkr and GoodHire are the usual starting points, Certn is the cheapest published entry at $13.99, and First Advantage offers small business self-serve from $29 with no account setup fee. HireRight, Sterling, Accurate, VICTIG, and Cisive list no prices, so each one means an account setup or a sales conversation before you see a number.

Do I need to tell a candidate about a background check?

Yes. Under the FCRA you must provide a standalone written disclosure that a check will be obtained for employment purposes, which cannot be combined with the application or offer letter, and obtain written authorization before running it. If the report contributes to a rejection, a pre-adverse action notice with a copy of the report and a summary of rights must go first, followed by a reasonable dispute window and a final adverse action notice.

How far back does a background check go?

It depends on record type, state, and sometimes salary. Federally there is no limit on reporting criminal convictions, while paid tax liens and collections are capped at seven years and bankruptcies at ten. Civil suits, civil judgments, and records of arrest run seven years or until the governing statute of limitations expires, whichever is longer. Those limits all lift for roles paying $75,000 or more. At least ten states impose their own rules: Texas and Maryland keep a $75,000 carve-out, New York sets its threshold at $25,000, and California and Colorado have none at all. California and New York also bar reporting an arrest that produced no conviction.

Is there free employee background check software?

Not for hiring. The free, instant options out there are people-search sites whose terms state their data may not be used for employment decisions, because they are not consumer reporting agencies. Using one leaves you with no dispute process, no accuracy standard, and no defense if challenged. What is legitimately free is a trial from a real provider; what is genuinely instant is a database-only search, useful as a first pass but incomplete.

Can I run a background check myself instead of using a service?

You can search public records, but for hiring it is usually worse than it looks. Consumer reporting agencies maintain court access, apply FCRA accuracy and dispute processes, and produce a report that is defensible if a decision is challenged. Doing it informally gives you no dispute process and inconsistent coverage between candidates, which itself creates discrimination exposure. With base checks under $30, the saving rarely justifies the risk.

What is employment verification and how is it different from a background check?

Employment verification is one component of a check rather than a separate product. It confirms the candidate worked where they said, in the role claimed, for the dates given, either by contacting the former employer or querying a payroll database. Many employers now confirm only dates and title as policy, so it verifies facts rather than assessing performance. It is also the component most likely to delay a check.

Make HR the easy part of running your business

Onboarding, e-signatures, training and core HR in one place. Up and running in 5 minutes.

  • 7-day free trial
  • No credit card required
  • Cancel anytime
4.7 on G2300+ companies trust FirstHR