FirstHR

Job Boards: 13 Job Posting Sites Compared for Employers

Job boards compared for employers: 13 job posting sites, what free posting actually gets you now, real cost at three hires a year, and what comes next.

Nick Anisimov

Nick Anisimov

FirstHR Founder

Hiring•
•
22 min

Job Boards: 13 Job Posting Sites Compared for Employers

What free posting actually gets you after Indeed capped it, which boards changed hands or shut down in 2025, what three hires a year really costs in advertising, the pay transparency rules that apply to the posting itself, and what has to happen once someone accepts

This page is for employers deciding where to advertise a role: what each job board costs, what it actually delivers, and which kind of hire it suits. If you are looking for work rather than hiring, the boards below are still the right places to search, but everything here is written from the buying side.

The landscape moved sharply through 2025 and 2026, and most published guides have not caught up. Indeed now caps free direct posting at three jobs a month, each visible for 30 days. Since March 31, 2026, it also hides jobs sent in by feed unless they are sponsored, whenever the employer's applicant tracking system (ATS) could have posted them through an Indeed integration instead.

Two familiar names also changed shape. Glassdoor stopped being a separate board and now sends employers to Indeed to hire. CareerBuilder and Monster went through Chapter 11 bankruptcy, and their job sites were sold at auction. A guide written in 2024 will tell you to do things that no longer work.

Most roundups rank on brand recognition and quote rates that stopped being accurate in 2025. This one compares 13 job boards with pricing checked against each vendor's own pages. It explains what free actually gets you now, models advertising cost at three hires a year, covers the pay transparency rules that apply to the posting, and ends with what has to happen once someone says yes.

TL;DR
Job boards bring candidates; they do not run your hiring process. Indeed claims the most reach, but free posting is capped at three jobs a month and sponsored minimums are set per job. Google for Jobs is the strongest free option if your career page publishes structured data. Glassdoor posting now runs through Indeed. Match the board to the role.

What changed, and why older guides mislead

Start here, because three changes invalidated a lot of standard advice, and most listicles still repeat it: Indeed changed how free and sponsored posting work, Glassdoor stopped being a separate board, and CareerBuilder and Monster went through bankruptcy. If you last shopped job boards two years ago, your assumptions are out of date in ways that cost money.

What changedWhenWhat it means for you
Indeed limits free direct posts to three per company per calendar monthIn force nowA fourth free role in the same month simply does not run
Each free Indeed post stays visible for up to 30 daysIn force nowA free listing drops out after a month unless you sponsor it
Single-source feed jobs lost free visibility where the employer’s ATS has an Indeed integrationMarch 31, 2026Post through the ATS integration or pay for placement
Indeed states there is no universal minimum for Sponsored JobsGuidance updated June 1, 2026The floor is set per job, so budget from the price Indeed shows you
Glassdoor’s employer site now sends hiring to Indeed2025Glassdoor is now employer branding and reviews, not a separate board
CareerBuilder and Monster filed Chapter 11June 24, 2025Their job boards were sold at auction; Monster+ now posts to both sites

The Indeed changes matter most because Indeed is where most small employers start. Its help center states the position plainly: employers posting directly can publish up to three free jobs per calendar month in the US, each live for up to 30 days. Accounts linked to one parent company share that allowance, so five location accounts get three free jobs between them, not fifteen.

The free tier is not what it was
If your hiring plan assumed free Indeed postings, recheck the arithmetic. Three roles a month is enough for most small businesses, but the 30-day window is not: a free role drops out of search after a month unless you sponsor it. And if you push jobs to Indeed through a single-source feed (an automated XML feed of your own job listings) while your applicant tracking system has an Indeed integration, those jobs have shown only when sponsored since March 31, 2026. Recruiting and staffing agencies are excluded from Indeed's free posting offer altogether.

What a job board is

The job board meaning is straightforward, and so is the answer to what are job boards: a job board is a website where employers post open roles and candidates search and apply. Employers pay for placement and visibility, candidates use it free, and the board makes money on the employer side. That is the whole model, and it has been remarkably stable for thirty years even as the individual brands have risen and collapsed.

Definition
Job board
A website that hosts job listings, where employers advertise vacancies and candidates search and apply. Also called a job posting site, a job posting website, an online job board, or a hiring website. Plural variants read the same: job posting sites, job posting websites, job posting boards, internet job boards, and job boards online all describe this shelf. The job board definition that matters commercially is simple: it is an advertising channel, not a hiring system. It brings you applicants and does nothing with them afterwards.

Two things are frequently confused with job boards and are not. A job search engine or job aggregator, such as Google for Jobs, hosts no listings at all: it indexes them from employer career pages and other boards using structured data (code on the page that labels it as a job listing).

The second is an applicant tracking system, which manages candidates after they apply and typically distributes your posting to several boards at once. Understanding which of the three you are looking at prevents most of the confusion in this category.

Types of job boards

Online job boards divide into four types, and matching the type to the role does more for candidate quality than raising the advertising budget.

TypeHow it worksExamplesBest used for
General volume boardsBroad audience across every industry and levelIndeed, ZipRecruiter, SimplyHired, Monster+Roles with a large candidate pool
Professional networksListings alongside profiles and social graphLinkedInSalaried, professional, and senior roles
Aggregators and search enginesIndex listings from elsewhere rather than hosting themGoogle for JobsFree reach if your career page is set up correctly
Niche and specialty boardsNarrow audience defined by industry, level, or work typeDice, Handshake, Snagajob, Wellfound, FlexJobsRoles where the right candidate is hard to find broadly

The tradeoff is consistent. General boards give you volume and, increasingly, volume is the problem rather than the solution, since AI-assisted applications have driven up quantity without improving fit. Niche boards give you fewer applicants who are closer to the role. For a small business without someone whose job is screening, fewer and better is usually the right trade.

How to post a job, step by step

Posting a job well comes down to the eight steps below, and most of them happen before you pick a board. Where to post gets most of the attention, but the same ad appears on every board, so the writing is the part of the whole exercise that pays off most.

1
Define the role before you write the ad
Title, essential duties, must-have versus nice-to-have requirements, and the pay range. A job posting assembled from a vague brief produces vague applicants, and no amount of advertising budget fixes that.
2
Set the pay range
Required by law in 14 states and the District of Columbia once Connecticut’s rule starts on October 1, 2026, and increasingly expected everywhere. Decide the good-faith range before publishing rather than after a candidate asks, because changing it mid-process is worse than posting it wide.
3
Write for the candidate, not the org chart
Lead with what the person will do and who they will work with. Long requirement lists deter qualified applicants, particularly candidates who screen themselves out for missing one item on a list of fifteen.
4
Add the compliance language
Standard equal opportunity statement, no criminal history question in the application where ban-the-box rules apply, and accurate duties. The posting is a document that can be produced in a dispute.
5
Publish to your own career page first
This is what Google for Jobs indexes and what candidates check before applying. If the structured data is correct, distribution to Google costs nothing and happens automatically.
6
Choose two or three boards, not eight
One general board for reach, one niche board matched to the role, and your career page. Posting everywhere multiplies the screening burden without proportionally improving the candidate pool.
7
Decide how you will track the source
Ask candidates where they saw the role, or use per-board tracking links. Without this you will renew a subscription next year with no idea whether it produced a hire.
8
Close the posting when the role is filled
Stale live listings are how employers accidentally join the ghost job statistics, and candidates notice. Check that closures propagate to every board, not just your career page.

13 job boards at a glance

The table below covers the boards a US small employer would realistically consider, with what each costs after the 2025 and 2026 changes wherever the vendor's own pages confirm a price.

Job boardTypeFree tierWhat it costsBest for
IndeedGeneral volume3 free direct posts monthly; sponsored minimum set per jobHighest reach, most competition
LinkedInProfessionalOne free post at a time; promotion on a budget you setSalaried and professional roles
ZipRecruiterGeneral volumeFlat-rate or per-click plans; no rate quoted hereSyndication to partner boards
Google for JobsAggregatorFree with correct structured dataAnyone with a career page
WellfoundStartupsFree for employers who disclose payStartup and technology roles
SimplyHiredGeneralFree tier; employer posting now routes via IndeedCoverage you already get through Indeed
CraigslistLocal$10 to $75 flat per post, varying by areaLocal and trades hiring
DiceTechnology$399 per 30-day job slotEngineering and IT roles
HandshakeCampusFree Basic plan; Pro $450 monthlyInternships and new graduates
SnagajobHourlyFree to start; paid rates not confirmed hereShift and hourly work
FlexJobsRemoteEmployer terms not confirmed hereVetted remote and flexible roles
GlassdoorEmployer brandJob posting now routes through IndeedReviews and employer branding
Monster+GeneralFrom $8 daily; Pro $299 monthlyLegacy reach after restructuring
Verified September 2026 against each vendor's own pages. Free tier marks whether an employer can post at no cost, not whether that post performs. We could not confirm a current rate from ZipRecruiter, Snagajob, or FlexJobs directly, so no figure is quoted for them rather than repeating third-party estimates. Glassdoor no longer operates as a separate job board: its employer site now sends hiring to Indeed, and it remains an employer branding and review platform. Monster+, the pay-as-you-go plan Monster already offered before the June 2025 bankruptcy, now publishes to both Monster and CareerBuilder, and CareerBuilder is no longer a standalone posting channel.

How we evaluated these job boards

We judged every board on the four tests below, not on brand recognition or on pricing that stopped being accurate in 2025.

Is the pricing current, and is it published?
Every price was checked against the vendor’s own pages in September 2026. That matters more than usual here, because Indeed changed its feed rules on March 31, 2026 and now caps free direct posts. Where we could not confirm a rate from the vendor itself, as with ZipRecruiter, Snagajob, and FlexJobs, we quote no figure rather than repeat third-party estimates.
What does free actually deliver?
A free tier that produces no visibility is not free, it is unpaid. We recorded post limits, visibility windows, and the conditions attached, because the difference between unlimited free listings and three a month that vanish after 30 days is the difference between a viable strategy and a wasted afternoon.
Who is the board actually good for?
Each board was matched to role type rather than ranked absolutely, because the honest answer to where should I post is that it depends on what you are hiring. A general board ranked first overall is useless advice for someone hiring a warehouse shift lead or a new graduate.
Has the platform changed hands or status?
Several well-known names in this category are not what a 2024 guide says they are. Glassdoor now sends employers to Indeed to hire, CareerBuilder and Monster were sold out of a 2025 bankruptcy, and Snagajob became part of JobGet in November 2024. Recommending a board that has been folded into another product, sold, or come through bankruptcy without saying so is the most common failure in existing content, and we flagged each change on the board it affects.

The volume leaders

Four options carry most US hiring traffic. For a general role these are where you start, with the caveat that Indeed's free tier is considerably thinner than it used to be.

Indeed
Best for reach, with a much smaller free tier than before
Free: Three direct posts per calendar month in the US, shared across linked company accounts, each live up to 30 daysPaid: Sponsored Jobs billed per click or started application, above a minimum Indeed sets for each job rather than a published floorExtras: Smart Sourcing resume search sold as a separate subscription, with a trial

Indeed calls itself the world's number one job site, citing comScore visit data, and it is the default job board most US employers try first. Reach is its main strength, the employer dashboard is straightforward, and for a general role in a populated area a sponsored Indeed post will produce applications quickly.

The economics are tighter for small employers than older guides suggest. The free cap of three jobs a month and the 30-day visibility window are the obvious limits. Sponsored pricing has no published floor: Indeed's own guidance says the minimum is dynamic, set for each job based on local job seekers and competing bids, and you are billed per click or per started application.

The March 31, 2026 feed policy adds a narrower rule: if your applicant tracking system could post jobs through an Indeed integration, the same jobs sent through a single-source feed show only when sponsored. Beyond cost, application quality is the recurring complaint: hiring managers often report that many applicants fail basic qualification screens.

Pros
Largest reach of any job board, by its own comScore-based claim
Still free for up to three roles a month posted directly
Straightforward employer dashboard with no setup project
Sponsored placement produces applications quickly for general roles
Cons
Free posts capped at three monthly with only 30 days of visibility
Sponsored minimum set per job, so there is no fixed rate to budget from
Feed jobs from integrated ATSs show only when sponsored since March 31, 2026
Application volume is high and qualification rates are widely reported as low
LinkedIn
Best for salaried and professional roles
Free: One live job post at a timePaid: Promoted posts run on a daily or total budget you set, with a minimum that depends on the role; Recruiter Lite is a separate paid seatBest for: Professional, technical, and management hiring

LinkedIn is where professional candidates already are, which is the whole argument. A posting sits next to the candidate's network, employees can share it, and passive candidates who are not actively searching still see it. For salaried roles above entry level it consistently produces better-qualified applicants than the general boards, even at lower volume.

The free tier is genuinely limited to one live role at a time, so a company hiring two positions simultaneously is paying for at least one. Promotion runs on a budget you set and is charged per click. In LinkedIn's own example, a $10 daily budget costs $300 or less over 30 days.

LinkedIn is also a poor fit for hourly, shift, and trades roles, where the candidate population is simply not on the platform in the same way.

Pros
Reaches passive candidates who are not actively job hunting
Consistently better applicant fit for salaried professional roles
Employee sharing extends reach at no additional cost
One free live posting, visible in search and among your connections
Cons
Only one free live post at a time; concurrent roles cost money
Promotion minimums vary by role and are not published
Weak for hourly, shift, and trades hiring
Recruiter seats are a separate paid subscription
Google for Jobs
Best genuinely free option for employers with a career page
Cost: Free, permanently, with no posting limitsRequirement: Your career page must publish valid JobPosting structured dataBest for: Any employer willing to set up markup once

Google for Jobs is not a board; it is a search feature that surfaces listings from career pages and boards directly in search results. That distinction is why it is free: Google is indexing your page rather than hosting your listing. Once your career page publishes correct JobPosting structured data, every role appears with no per-post cost and no monthly limit, in the place a large share of job searches begins.

The requirement is a real one. Someone has to implement the structured data, and if your careers page is a PDF or a paragraph on the about page, that work has to happen first. Most modern applicant tracking systems publish the markup automatically, which is one of the practical arguments for using one. There is also no dashboard, no applicant management, and no support: it is distribution and nothing else.

Pros
Free with no posting limits or visibility windows
Appears where a large share of job searches begin
No account, contract, or sales conversation required
Most applicant tracking systems publish the required markup automatically
Cons
Requires valid structured data on a real career page
No dashboard, applicant management, or support
Nothing to optimize beyond the markup and the job description itself
Useless if you have no career page to index
Still Using Spreadsheets for Onboarding?
Automate documents, training assignments, task management, and track onboarding progress in real time.
See How It Works
ZipRecruiter
Best for syndication across partner sites
Pricing: Flat-rate job posting plans on terms from a day to a year, or per-click campaigns; no current rate confirmed from the companyTrial: Free trials are offered; check the length and card terms at signupBest for: Employers who want one posting distributed widely with active matching

ZipRecruiter's proposition is distribution plus matching: one posting syndicates to a large partner network, and its matching engine pushes the role to candidates rather than waiting for them to search. For an employer who does not want to manage several board accounts, that consolidation has real value, and the matching genuinely surfaces candidates the general boards miss.

Pricing opacity is the problem for a small buyer. ZipRecruiter's 2025 annual report describes flat-rate plans on terms from a day to a year alongside per-click campaigns capped per job. We could not confirm a current rate from the company, so we do not repeat the third-party estimates in circulation. On a time-based plan, three hires a year can work out considerably more expensive per hire than pay-per-click.

Pros
One posting syndicated across a large partner network
Active matching pushes roles to candidates rather than waiting
Single account rather than managing several board logins
Established platform with substantial employer base
Cons
No current rate we could confirm from the company
Plan terms and trial conditions need checking at signup
Time-based plans are expensive per hire at low hiring volume
Plan-based pricing is hard to compare for a company hiring occasionally

Free job posting sites that still work

Free job posting sites still exist and still work; they just are not the ones most guides name. Indeed narrowing its own free tier changed which options are worth using, and two free layers are consistently overlooked.

Free optionWhat you getThe catch
Google for JobsUnlimited postings, no visibility windowRequires valid structured data on a career page
Your state job bankStatewide reach through the workforce agencyNobody uses it, so nobody knows it exists
Indeed free tierThree direct posts a month, 30 days eachCapped per company, and staffing agencies are excluded
LinkedIn free postOne live role at a timeA second concurrent role costs money
WellfoundUnlimited free posting for startupsMust disclose pay; narrow audience
Handshake BasicFree employer posting to studentsEarly-career candidates only
Your own career pageFull control, no fees, feeds Google for JobsOnly reaches people who already found you

The state job bank is the genuinely underused one. Every US state runs one through its workforce agency, posting is free, and covered federal contractors already carry a mandatory listing obligation there under VEVRAA, the Vietnam Era Veterans' Readjustment Assistance Act.

Together with Google for Jobs and a well-built career page, the state job bank makes it possible to run a small hiring program at zero advertising cost. That was true before the Indeed changes and is more valuable now.

Wellfound
Best free board for startup and technology roles
Cost: Free for employers willing to disclose pay on the listingAudience: Startup-oriented candidates, heavily technicalBest for: Early-stage companies hiring engineers, product, and design

Wellfound, formerly AngelList Talent, is the strongest free option for startup hiring and one of the few boards where free means genuinely free rather than restricted. Its condition is pay transparency: listings must show salary and, where relevant, equity, which self-selects for candidates comfortable with that and saves a conversation later.

The audience is narrow by design. If you are hiring a bookkeeper, a warehouse supervisor, or a dental assistant, this is the wrong board and posting there is wasted effort. Its candidate base also skews toward people who want startup risk, which is an advantage for a seed-stage company and a mismatch for an established small business offering stability.

Pros
Genuinely free, with unlimited job listings
Strong concentration of startup-minded technical candidates
Pay disclosure requirement filters out mismatched applicants early
Company profiles work as lightweight employer branding
Cons
Narrow audience; useless outside startup and technology hiring
Requires publishing salary, which some employers will not do
Candidate base skews toward risk tolerance rather than stability
Low volume compared with the general boards
SimplyHired
Best low-cost general coverage
Cost: Free posting tier availableOwnership: Part of the same group as Indeed and GlassdoorBest for: Broad general coverage at no cost alongside a primary board

SimplyHired is a general board with a free posting tier and a wide aggregated index. The important detail is that employer posting now runs through Indeed. SimplyHired's own posting page says a job posted there, free or sponsored, also appears on Indeed, so it is no longer a distinct channel at all.

SimplyHired also sits within the same corporate group as Indeed and Glassdoor, so what looks like a diversified posting strategy across three brands is one owner. It generates less volume than Indeed and offers little in the way of employer tooling. For a small business it is best treated as free additional coverage, posted once alongside your main channel rather than managed actively.

Pros
Free tier reached through your existing Indeed account
Wide aggregated index and broad general audience
Useful as no-cost secondary coverage
Familiar brand with long operating history
Cons
Substantially lower volume than Indeed
Minimal employer tooling or analytics
Employer posting routes through Indeed, so it is not a separate channel
Rarely worth active management as a primary channel
Craigslist
Best low-cost option for local and trades hiring
Cost: Flat fee per post, $10 to $75 depending on the areaAudience: Local, weighted toward trades, service, and hourly workBest for: Local hiring where candidates search by city rather than by role

Craigslist remains genuinely effective for local hiring in trades, hospitality, service, and general labor, and its flat per-post fee is the most predictable pricing in this comparison. For a landscaping business or a restaurant hiring in one city, it frequently outperforms boards with far more sophisticated technology.

There is no employer tooling of any kind, no applicant management, and no screening, so applications arrive as email. Quality varies widely and scam and spam responses are a known issue. It is a classified ad, priced and functioning like one, which is the right tool for some roles and completely wrong for others.

Pros
Flat, predictable per-post pricing with no subscription
Genuinely effective for local trades, service, and hourly hiring
No account complexity or sales process
Strong in markets where candidates search by city
Cons
No applicant management, screening, or analytics whatsoever
Applications arrive as unstructured email
Spam and low-quality responses are a persistent problem
Reach limited to a single city per post

Niche and specialty job boards

Matching the board to the role is the highest-return decision in this whole comparison. A niche board delivers fewer applicants who are far closer to the requirement, which matters most when nobody in your company has time to screen a hundred resumes.

Dice
Best niche board for engineering and IT roles
Pricing: No free tier; a single job slot is $399 for 30 days, and Starter is $649 a month for three slots on month-to-month billingAudience: Software engineers, developers, infrastructure, and IT professionalsBest for: Technical roles where stack-specific filtering matters

Dice has served technology hiring since before most general boards existed, and its value is filtering: candidates are searchable by stack, certification, and clearance in ways a general board cannot match, and the audience is technical rather than technical-adjacent. Salary benchmarking data and applicant tracking integrations come with it.

There is no free tier at all, and at $399 for a single 30-day job slot it is the most expensive single posting with a published price in this comparison. For one senior engineering role where a mis-hire is costly, that is defensible. For a generalist role that happens to touch technology, it is not, and Wellfound or LinkedIn will reach a comparable audience for less.

Pros
Deepest technical filtering by stack, certification, and clearance
Audience is genuinely technical rather than technical-adjacent
Salary benchmarking data included for calibrating offers
Established applicant tracking integrations
Cons
No free tier of any kind
Most expensive single post with a published price here, at $399 for 30 days
Useless outside engineering and IT hiring
Overkill for generalist roles that merely touch technology
Handshake
Best board for internships and new graduate hiring
Pricing: Free Basic plan; Pro $450 a month; promoted jobs sold as an add-onAudience: University students and recent graduates through campus partnershipsBest for: Interns, entry-level, and graduate pipelines

Handshake owns the campus lane through direct partnerships with universities, which is why it reaches students that no general board does: the account comes through their school rather than their own job search. Basic employer posting is free, making it one of the genuinely no-cost options here, and campus recruiters treat it as the board that matters for internships and graduate programs.

It is a weak fit for experienced hiring. Handshake now promotes an alumni audience alongside students, but its reach is built on campus partnerships, so the audience skews early-career. Students also apply in bulk, so set up response templates and a screening approach before you post rather than after two hundred applications arrive. Pairing it with the school career center produces better results than posting alone.

Pros
Free Basic plan for posting jobs and receiving applicants
Direct university partnerships reach students other boards cannot
The default channel for internships and graduate programs
Works well alongside campus career centers and fairs
Cons
A weak fit for experienced or senior hiring
Audience skews toward students and recent graduates
Students apply in bulk, which needs a screening plan in advance
Promoted jobs are a paid add-on
Snagajob
Best job posting site for hourly and shift-based roles
Ownership: Part of JobGet since a November 2024 acquisition; JobGet now presents Snagajob, Seasoned, and JobGet as one employer solution with one candidate networkPricing: Free to get started; paid rates not confirmed from Snagajob directly, so none is quoted hereAudience: Hourly workers in restaurants, retail, hospitality, and warehousingBest for: Shift-based hiring where speed matters more than resume depth

Snagajob is the specialist for hourly and shift work. It now sits inside JobGet alongside Seasoned, a restaurant and hospitality network, and JobGet says the combined network reaches more than 100 million everyday workers. JobGet pitches that combined offer at employers with 50 or more open roles who hire at high volume.

Before you buy, check which hiring tools your plan includes, such as applicant tracking, interview scheduling, onboarding, and employment verification, since JobGet now markets the three brands as a single employer solution. We could not confirm current paid rates from Snagajob directly, so none is quoted here. Sign-up is free, which lets you check the rate inside the account before committing.

Snagajob is narrow by design: posting a salaried professional role here wastes the fee. Reach is also concentrated in the sectors it serves, so an hourly role outside restaurants, retail, or warehousing gets less benefit.

Pros
Purpose-built for hourly and shift-based hiring
Restaurant and hospitality reach through sister network Seasoned
Free sign-up to start posting
Now shares a candidate network with JobGet and Seasoned
Cons
The combined JobGet offer targets employers with 50 or more open roles
Wasted spend on salaried or professional roles
Reach concentrated in food service, retail, and hospitality
Less useful for hourly work outside those sectors
FlexJobs
Best board for vetted remote and flexible roles
Pricing: Employer terms not confirmed from FlexJobs directly, so no rate is quoted hereAudience: Candidates specifically seeking remote, part-time, and flexible workBest for: Employers hiring fully remote who want a scam-free candidate pool

FlexJobs has operated since 2007 and its differentiator is hand-screening: every listing is checked for legitimacy before it publishes, which is why candidates pay to use it and why the audience trusts what they find. Everyone there is looking for remote or flexible work, which suits a company hiring several remote positions at once.

Two limits matter. The vetting applies to listings, not candidates: FlexJobs checks that your job is real but does not screen who applies, so screening remains entirely your work. And FlexJobs is not an employer of record, so it handles no payroll or compliance.

Pricing is the open question. We could not confirm FlexJobs' current employer terms, so get the price in writing, and if you hire one remote role a year, compare it with one sponsored post elsewhere.

Pros
Hand-screened listings give the platform genuine candidate trust
Audience specifically seeking remote and flexible arrangements
Long operating history and strong brand recognition in remote hiring
Cons
Employer pricing could not be confirmed, so get a quote before comparing
Vetting covers listings, not candidates; screening is still your job
Provides no payroll, compliance, or employer of record coverage

Other specialty boards worth knowing

The boards below are named so you can find the right channel for a specific role. They are not individually reviewed here, because for most small employers they are situational rather than part of a standing strategy.

Board or channelAudienceCostUse it when
Built InTechnology professionals by metro areaPaid packages; prices not publishedHiring technical staff in a specific city
We Work RemotelyRemote-only candidates, broad reach$299 per standard post; bulk packs from $179 a postHiring fully remote outside a vetted marketplace
IdealistNonprofit and mission-driven candidates$145 per 30-day job post for US nonprofits, $195 per location for businessesHiring for a nonprofit or social enterprise
LaddersRoles above roughly $100,000No verifiable published pricingSenior hiring, though employer evidence is thin
Executive and director-level boardsCandidates at director level and abovePaid, usually by subscription or search feeSenior hiring, where a retained search firm often replaces the board entirely
USAJOBSFederal government applicantsFree, federal agencies onlyNot applicable to private employers
Your state job bankStatewide candidates through the workforce agencyFreeAlways; this is the free layer most teams never switch on
American Job Center veteran servicesVeteran candidates via local referralFreeActively recruiting veterans
Industry association boardsMembers of a professional bodyVaries, often lowLicensed or credentialed roles
HR and people operations boardsHR, recruiting, and people operations candidates, including the SHRM job boardPaid per post, published pricingHiring your first HR person, a recruiter, or a people operations lead
Diversity-focused boardsCandidates from under-represented groupsVariesBroadening a pipeline that keeps returning the same profile
International and regional boardsCandidates in one country: SEEK in Australia and New Zealand, Reed in the UK, StepStone in Germany, Naukri in IndiaVaries by marketHiring outside the US, where the regional board usually beats the global brand

Two of those deserve emphasis. The state job bank costs nothing to use, yet most small employers never touch it. And on diversity boards, the posting language itself is part of the pipeline question: a listing that never addresses diversity commitments keeps returning the profile it always returned.

International job boards raise a bigger question than which site to use. Outside the US the strongest boards are regional rather than global, so the country decides the channel. The harder problem is how you will employ the person: a local entity, a contractor agreement, or an employer of record. Settle that before you advertise.

Job boards that changed status

Two names you will find recommended in older guides are no longer what those guides describe. Both are worth understanding rather than simply avoiding.

Glassdoor
Now an employer branding platform rather than a job board
Status: Job posting now runs through Indeed; Glassdoor's employer site sends hiring thereWhat remains: Company reviews, ratings, salary data, and employer brandingBest for: Managing what candidates read about you, not advertising roles

Glassdoor's employer site now puts it plainly: grow your employer brand with Glassdoor, hire with Indeed. Recruit Holdings, which owns both, cut about 1,300 jobs across its Indeed and Glassdoor segment in July 2025.

Glassdoor continues as an employer branding and review platform, and that role is genuinely important: candidates check it before applying and before accepting, and an unanswered one-star review does more damage than a weak job ad.

What Glassdoor is not anymore is a separate place to post. If a guide tells you to advertise on Glassdoor as a distinct channel from Indeed, it predates the change. Treat Glassdoor as reputation management: claim the profile, respond to reviews, keep the company page current.

Pros
Candidates genuinely check it before applying and before accepting
Salary data and reviews shape employer reputation at no cost
Company profile is free to claim and maintain
Responding to reviews pays off and is widely neglected
Cons
No longer a separate job posting channel from Indeed
Employers cannot delete reviews themselves, only respond to them
Reputation work is ongoing effort rather than a one-time post
Older guides recommending it as a distinct board are out of date
Monster+
Legacy reach under new ownership since the 2025 bankruptcy
Status: CareerBuilder and Monster filed Chapter 11 on June 24, 2025; assets sold in a court-supervised auctionPricing: Standard from $8 per day per job, charged per click; Pro $299 a month with 299 creditsBest for: Employers wanting legacy reach with a cross-post to CareerBuilder

CareerBuilder and Monster merged in September 2024 and filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in Delaware nine months later, on June 24, 2025, estimating liabilities of $100 million to $500 million on the petition. The job board business was sold at the bankruptcy auction to Bold Holdings, and the media properties went to a separate buyer.

CareerBuilder no longer functions as a standalone posting channel. Paid posts on Monster+, the pay-as-you-go plan Monster already offered before the filing, cross-post there automatically. Its rate, from $8 a day per job, is one of the few published paid rates in this comparison, and the legacy audience has not disappeared.

The honest caveat is platform risk: a business that has just been through Chapter 11 and changed ownership is a different proposition from an established one, and traffic stability after a restructuring is not guaranteed. Treat Monster+ as a secondary channel while the new ownership settles.

Pros
Published pay-as-you-go rate from $8 a day per job
Paid posts cross-post to CareerBuilder automatically
Legacy audience still produces applicants in some markets
Pro tier with monthly credits suits steady low-volume hiring
Cons
Sold out of Chapter 11 in 2025 to new ownership
Traffic stability after the restructuring is unproven
CareerBuilder is no longer a separate channel to evaluate
Substantially lower reach than Indeed or LinkedIn
Companies Using FirstHR Onboard 3x Faster
Join hundreds of small businesses who transformed their new hire experience.
See It in Action

What posting a job actually costs

The table below models advertising spend for a small business hiring three roles a year, each advertised for 30 days. It covers the board fee only, which is the smaller half of what hiring costs.

OptionPricing basisOne role, 30 daysThree roles a yearNotes
Google for JobsFree with structured data$0$0Requires a career page publishing JobPosting markup
Indeed free tierThree direct posts monthly, 30 days$0$0Only works if you post three or fewer roles a month
LinkedIn freeOne live post at a time$0$0Second concurrent role requires promotion
Indeed sponsoredPer-job minimum set by IndeedBudget you setBudget you setNo published floor; billed per click or started application
LinkedIn promotedDaily or total budget you set$300 or less at $10 a day$900 or lessLinkedIn’s own example; the minimum varies by role
Monster+ StandardFrom $8 daily per job$240$720Cross-posts to CareerBuilder automatically
Dice single slot$399 per 30-day job slot$399$1,197Technology roles only
ZipRecruiterFlat-rate or per-click plansNot confirmedNot confirmedNo current rate confirmed from the company
Craigslist$10 to $75 flat per post$10 to $75$30 to $225Local reach only, no syndication
Modeled on a small business hiring three roles a year, each run for 30 days, verified September 2026 against each vendor's own pricing pages. Advertising spend only: this excludes the far larger cost of the hiring process itself, which industry benchmarks put in the thousands of dollars per hire once time, screening, and onboarding are counted. Indeed and LinkedIn publish no flat floor for paid placement and set the minimum per job when you sponsor or promote it. ZipRecruiter is listed without a figure because we could not confirm a current rate from the company.

Two things stand out. Free is still achievable if your hiring is low volume and you have a career page publishing structured data. In that case, Google for Jobs plus the Indeed free tier plus one LinkedIn post covers three roles a year at no advertising cost at all.

Paid reach, on the other hand, is harder to budget than it looks. Indeed and LinkedIn both set their minimums per job rather than publishing a floor, so the only fixed paid prices in the table are Monster+ at $8 a day, Dice at $399 a slot, and the Craigslist flat fee.

Advertising is the cheap part of hiring
According to SHRM benchmarking data (2025), average cost per hire for nonexecutive roles was $5,475. Talent-management consultant Edie Goldberg, quoted in a 2022 SHRM article, estimates that hard costs are only 30 to 40 percent of the total cost to hire. Against that, the difference between a $0 and a $300 job ad is not the number that decides your hiring cost. The number that decides it is how long the role stays open and how much of your week the process consumes, which is why time to fill is worth tracking per board.

Working out which board actually produced the hire

The only way to know which board produced a hire is to track the source yourself, because the boards cannot: they report clicks and applications, not which channel produced the person you hired six weeks later. Almost nobody does this, and it is the reason subscriptions renew for years without evidence.

MetricWhat it tells youHow to capture it without software
Source of hireWhich board produced people you actually hiredAsk on the application and record it when you make an offer
Applications per boardWhich channel produces volumeCount them in a spreadsheet per role
Qualified rate per boardWhich channel produces people worth interviewingMark each application as screened in or out
Cost per applicantWhether a paid board is competitive on volumeBoard spend divided by applications from that board
Cost per hireThe only number that decides renewalTotal spend divided by hires from that channel
Time to fillWhether the channel is fast enough for the roleDays from posting to accepted offer

The minimum viable version is one spreadsheet column: where did you see this role. Ask it on every application, record the answer at offer stage, and after three or four hires you will know which board to keep paying for. Without it, the renewal decision is made on brand recognition, which is exactly what the boards are counting on.

This matters more with per-post and subscription pricing than with pay-per-click. A $400 monthly subscription that produced no hires in a year is a $4,800 mistake nobody noticed, while a sponsored campaign that produced nothing is at least visible in the spend report.

Ghost jobs and why your postings might look like them

A ghost job is a listing kept live with no real intent to hire, and it has become common enough that candidates now assume it. That assumption affects your postings whether or not you have ever posted one deliberately.

The scale is genuinely contested. The Congressional Research Service put it plainly in April 2025: there are no official statistics on the magnitude of ghost jobs (CRS In Focus IF12977). Every published estimate comes from one platform counting its own listings, which is why the numbers in circulation disagree and none of them can be checked against an official source.

Most accidental ghost jobs are integration failures
You do not have to intend it. When a role is closed in an applicant tracking system, the career page updates immediately, but board feeds can lag by a day or more and sometimes never update at all if the integration is stale. The result is a filled role sitting live on Indeed with candidates still applying. The Congressional Research Service names the same mechanism: job boards automatically copying postings from other websites, so a role closed at the source stays live in the copy. Check that closures propagate everywhere, not just where you clicked close.

Three practical consequences follow for an employer acting in good faith. Close postings promptly and verify the closure reached every board. Do not leave evergreen listings live for pipeline building without saying so, since that is exactly the behavior candidates now penalize. And watch the state bills rather than Congress.

As of the April 2025 CRS brief, no bill explicitly addressing ghost postings had been introduced in Congress. Legislators in New Jersey, Kentucky, and California, by contrast, had introduced measures that would make employers disclose whether a posting is for a real vacancy.

New York has since gone further. In June 2026 its legislature passed S8877, which would require employers with at least 100 employees, and third-party job posting sites, to state on each ad whether it is for a current vacancy. The bill had not become law by late September 2026.

The job posting itself is now a regulated document in a growing number of states, and getting it wrong is a compliance issue rather than a marketing one.

RequirementWhere it appliesWhat to do
Salary range in the posting14 states plus DC (Connecticut from October 1, 2026): California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Vermont, Virginia, and WashingtonInclude a good-faith range; more states are adding requirements each year
Remote role complicationsAny state where the work could be performedMany employers now post a range on every listing as policy
Equal opportunity languageFederal contractors and many state jurisdictionsInclude a standard EEO statement in the posting
Ban-the-box timingMany states and citiesDo not ask about criminal history in the application itself
Accurate job descriptionEverywhere, as a practical matterA posting that misstates duties or pay creates a dispute later

Published counts of pay transparency laws disagree with each other, because some sources fold in salary history bans, city ordinances, and laws that have passed but are not yet in force. The narrower list is the one that governs a posting: 14 states and the District of Columbia require the range in the advertisement itself, counting Connecticut from October 1, 2026.

Nevada and Rhode Island instead hand the range to the applicant during the process: after a completed interview in Nevada, and on request in Rhode Island.

Three of the fourteen have 2026 start dates: Virginia from July 1, Maine from July 29 for employers with 10 or more employees, and Connecticut from October 1. Connecticut's new rule adds the range and a general description of benefits to every internal and public job advertisement, on top of its existing rule of giving applicants the range on request.

Two thresholds are worth knowing by name. California applies at 15 or more employees, while Virginia and Maryland set no headcount threshold at all, so a three-person company advertising a role performed in either state is covered.

The safest operating position for a small employer hiring across state lines is to include a range on every posting, because working out which rule applies to a remote role is harder than simply complying everywhere. This is general information rather than legal advice; confirm with employment counsel.

Job boards vs hiring platforms and recruiting sites

Searches for hiring platforms, hiring websites, best hiring websites, recruiting sites, and best recruiting websites return a mixture of job boards and software, because the categories genuinely overlap. Separating them clarifies what you are buying.

Job boardHiring platform or ATS
What it doesAdvertises the role to candidatesManages candidates and the process around them
What you getApplications, usually by email or a basic inboxA pipeline, screening, scheduling, and status tracking
Priced byPer post, per click, or per subscription slotPer user or per employee, monthly
ExamplesIndeed, LinkedIn, ZipRecruiter, WellfoundApplicant tracking systems and recruiting software
You need it whenYou have a role to fillMore than one person reviews candidates, or hiring is continuous

The two are complementary rather than alternatives: platforms distribute to boards, and boards feed platforms. For a company hiring a handful of people a year, posting directly on two or three boards and tracking candidates in a spreadsheet works perfectly well.

Indeed's March 2026 feed policy changes that only for employers already on an integrated system: jobs they push through a single-source feed now show only when sponsored, so posting through the integration becomes the free route.

Two adjacent categories are worth separating from the boards themselves. Job posting services distribute one ad to several boards for a single fee, which saves setup time and hides which channel actually worked unless you insist on per-board tracking. Job posting apps, where a board offers one, are a convenience layer on the same listing rather than a separate market.

A note if you are searching rather than hiring

Searches for company hiring, companies hiring near me, and online job postings mostly come from candidates rather than employers, and this page will not help with those directly. The short version for anyone who landed here looking for work: the boards above are where the listings are, Indeed and LinkedIn carry the most, and niche boards carry the best-matched roles for your field.

There is an employer-side lesson in that traffic, though, and it is worth taking. Candidates searching company hiring and browsing online job postings are looking at your company page, your reviews, and your salary range before they apply. A posting with no range, on an unclaimed employer profile, next to unanswered negative reviews, competes badly against one that has all three sorted, regardless of which board it sits on.

What happens after the hire

Every board on this page stops working the moment a candidate accepts. What starts at that point is a separate process with federal deadlines attached, and it is where small employers most often lose the time they saved on advertising.

StepDeadlineWho owns it
Offer letter signed and storedBefore the start dateYou
Form I-9 employee sectionBy the first day of workThe employee, verified by you
Form I-9 employer sectionWithin three business days of startingYou
Form W-4 and state equivalentsBefore the first payroll runYou
Policy and handbook acknowledgementsTypically the first weekYou
Access, equipment, and trainingFirst day and first weekYou

Form I-9 is the one that carries real exposure. It applies to every new hire regardless of company size, the employer section is due within three business days of the start date, and civil penalties for paperwork violations run from $288 to $2,861 for each individual the violation involves.

This form is entirely routine to get right if there is a process, and entirely easy to miss if the start date arrives while everyone is still celebrating the hire.

Where FirstHR fits, and where it does not
FirstHR is not a job board and does not post jobs. For advertising a role, everything above is the answer and nothing here substitutes for it. What it covers is the column on the right of that table: e-signature for the offer letter, I-9 and new hire paperwork collected and stored, policy acknowledgements, onboarding task workflows, training with completion tracking, and employee records, at a flat $98 to $198 per month. The board brings you a candidate; this is the part that turns them into an employee who is properly set up by their first Friday.

How to choose where to post

Five questions settle this faster than reading another ranked list, and the first one matters more than which board tops anyone's chart.

What kind of role is it?
This decides the board, not brand recognition. Salaried and professional goes to LinkedIn. Hourly and shift goes to Snagajob or Craigslist. Technical goes to Dice or Wellfound. Interns and graduates go to Handshake. General roles with a wide candidate pool go to Indeed. Posting a warehouse role on LinkedIn or an engineering role on Craigslist wastes the budget and the two weeks.
Does your career page publish structured data?
If yes, Google for Jobs is free permanent distribution and should be running before you pay for anything. If no, that is the highest-return hour of setup work available in this whole comparison, and most applicant tracking systems do it automatically. Check by searching your own open role in Google and seeing whether it appears.
How many roles are you filling this month?
Three or fewer and the Indeed free tier still covers you, subject to the 30-day window. Four or more in one month and you are paying, so plan which roles get the free slots and which get sponsored rather than discovering the cap mid-week. Staffing agencies are excluded from the free offer entirely.
Does the posting comply where the role is based?
Include a salary range if any state involved requires one, and remember that a remote role may implicate several. Add standard equal opportunity language. Do not ask about criminal history in the application where ban-the-box rules apply. The posting is a regulated document in a growing number of jurisdictions, and fixing it after publication is harder than getting it right once.
What is your process for the week after they accept?
Write it down before you post, not after someone says yes. Offer letter, I-9 with its three-business-day employer deadline, W-4, policy acknowledgements, access and equipment. Hiring feels finished when the offer is accepted and is actually about half done, and the second half has statutory deadlines that the first half does not.

A closing note on strategy: post to fewer boards and put the saved effort into the job description itself. Every board in this comparison shows candidates the same text, and a clear, specific, honest description outperforms a vague one on every channel simultaneously.

Key Takeaways
Indeed allows three free direct posts per company each calendar month, each visible for up to 30 days, and since March 31, 2026, has shown single-source feed jobs only when sponsored if an integrated ATS could have posted them.
Indeed publishes no flat minimum for sponsored jobs: the floor is set per job from local demand and competing bids, so budget from the price shown when you sponsor.
Glassdoor is no longer a separate job board: its employer site now sends hiring to Indeed, so employer branding and reviews are what it does now.
Google for Jobs is the strongest genuinely free option, with no post limits or visibility windows, provided your career page publishes valid JobPosting structured data.
Match the board to the role rather than posting everywhere, since a niche board delivers fewer applicants who fit better.
The job posting is a regulated document: 14 states and the District of Columbia, counting Connecticut from October 1, 2026, require a pay range in the listing itself, and a remote role can trigger more than one of them at once.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a job board?

A website where employers post open roles and candidates search and apply. Employers pay for placement; candidates use it free. Two things are often confused with it: a job search engine such as Google for Jobs indexes listings from career pages rather than hosting them, and an applicant tracking system manages candidates after they apply and usually distributes postings to several boards. Boards bring you applicants; the ATS organizes them.

What are the best job boards for employers?

For most US small businesses the shortlist is Indeed for volume, LinkedIn for salaried and professional roles, and Google for Jobs, which is free if your career page publishes structured data. Beyond that, match the board to the role: Wellfound for startups, Dice for engineering, Handshake for graduates, Snagajob for hourly, FlexJobs for remote. Posting everywhere is not a strategy, since a role that fits a niche board reaches better candidates there than buried in a general feed.

Are job boards still free?

Partly, with conditions. Indeed allows three free direct posts per company each calendar month, each live for up to 30 days, and since March 31, 2026, jobs sent by feed appear only when sponsored if the employer's applicant tracking system has an Indeed integration. LinkedIn allows one free live post at a time. Google for Jobs stays free with valid structured data, and Wellfound, SimplyHired, Handshake, and Snagajob keep free entry points.

How much does it cost to post a job?

Free options exist, but paid reach has no single price anymore. Indeed and LinkedIn set paid minimums per job; LinkedIn's own example puts a $10 daily budget at $300 or less for 30 days. Monster+ starts at $8 a day, Dice charges $399 per 30-day slot, and Craigslist charges a flat $10 to $75 by area. Three roles a year can cost anywhere from nothing to over a thousand dollars.

What is the difference between a job board and a hiring platform?

A job board is a marketplace for listings; a hiring platform is software that manages the process around them, including distribution, applications, screening, scheduling, and tracking to offer. The overlap comes from boards adding platform features and platforms adding board distribution, which is why searches for hiring platforms and recruiting sites return both. A board answers where do I advertise; a platform answers how do I run the process.

Do I need an applicant tracking system to post jobs?

No. Indeed's free allowance covers jobs posted directly on the site, and its March 2026 feed change only affects employers who send single-source feeds while their applicant tracking system has an Indeed integration: they must post through the integration or sponsor. For a company hiring a handful of people a year, posting directly on each board is practical. Past roughly a dozen hires a year, or once more than one person reviews candidates, coordination cost usually exceeds the cost of software.

Do I have to include a salary range in the job posting?

It depends where the role is based. The range belongs in the advertisement itself across 14 states and the District of Columbia, with Connecticut joining on October 1, 2026: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington. Washington backs its rule with statutory damages of $100 to $5,000 per violation, which is the sort of number that settles the argument. Because a remote role can trigger obligations in any state where work may be performed, many employers now include a range on every posting as policy. This is general information, not legal advice.

What happens after a candidate accepts the offer?

Federal paperwork begins immediately. Form I-9 is required for every new hire regardless of company size, with the employee section completed by their first day and the employer section within three business days of them starting. Form W-4 is required for withholding, and state equivalents may apply. The offer letter needs signing and storing, policies need acknowledging, and access and training have to be arranged. The board delivered a candidate; converting them into an employee is a separate process with its own deadlines.

Make HR the easy part of running your business

Onboarding, e-signatures, training and core HR in one place. Up and running in 5 minutes.

  • 7-day free trial
  • No credit card required
  • Cancel anytime
4.7 on G2300+ companies trust FirstHR