Recruiting Software for Small Business: 10 Compared
Recruiting software for small business compared: what 6 of 10 tools cost at 15 employees, which 4 hide prices, and which pricing model fits how you hire.
I run a small company, and if another founder asked me which recruiting software to buy, my first question would be how they hire, not which features they want. This comparison applies that question to ten products a US small business can realistically buy: what each one with a published price bills at a concrete headcount, and which pricing model rewards which hiring pattern.
Between them, those ten use six different pricing models: a flat fee, per user, per employee whether or not you are hiring, per location, recruiting sold only on top of the vendor's own platform, and quote only, where you learn nothing until you take a call. That is why every starting price you see in this market is close to useless on its own.
Run the same company through the six that publish a recruiting price and the spread is enormous. A 15-employee business with four roles open pays about $540 a year on one option and about $3,600 on another at published rates, for products that do broadly the same job: post a role, collect applications in one place, move people through stages, and stop losing candidates in an inbox.
The verdict at the end is an honest one, split by how you hire rather than a single ranking that pretends every small business is the same.
- Sign the offer letter
- Sign the employee handbook
- Workplace Safety course
What recruiting software for small business covers
The core product is an applicant tracking system (ATS), and the terms recruiting software, hiring software, and recruitment software are used interchangeably for it. What separates products is less what they do than how deep they go on two things: sourcing candidates who have not applied, and everything that happens after an offer is accepted.
| Capability | What it does | Where products differ |
|---|---|---|
| Job posting and syndication | Publishes a role to free and paid job boards in one action | Almost nowhere; every product here does this |
| Branded careers page | A hosted page listing your open roles | Included even on most free tiers |
| Pipeline and stages | Moves candidates through screening, interview, and offer | The commodity core of the category |
| Collaboration and feedback | Hiring managers score candidates in one place | Gated behind user limits on some per-seat plans |
| Sourcing | Proactive search for candidates who have not applied | The biggest real gap; several affordable systems track inbound only |
| Assessments and video | Screening tests and one-way interviews | Paid add-ons on Workable Standard; JazzHR includes assessments from Plus |
| Reporting | Time to hire, source of hire, pipeline conversion | Basic reports early; advanced reporting a tier or two up |
| Offer and onboarding handoff | Getting an accepted candidate into an employee record | Built into the HR platforms; an add-on or extra tier on most trackers |
For a small business, the pipeline and the careers page are the parts that get used every day, and both are effectively identical across the field. That is worth saying plainly, because it means the buying decision is mostly a commercial one. If you are choosing between two products on features, you are probably choosing between two tiers of the same product.
Examples of recruiting software by type
The clearest way to read this category is by what a product is built around rather than by brand. Four of the ten here are plain applicant tracking systems sized for a small team: JazzHR, Breezy HR, Manatal, and Zoho Recruit. Each does the same core job and differs mainly in what it meters.
The rest sit around that core. Workable adds sourcing, assessments, and video to the tracker. BambooHR and Rippling put recruiting inside a wider HR platform. CareerPlug is built for hiring across locations. Lever and Greenhouse pair applicant tracking with candidate relationship management (CRM) and structured interviewing for companies past this stage.
What recruiting technology covers beyond the tracker
Recruiting technology is the whole stack rather than the pipeline alone: job boards and syndication at the front, the applicant tracking system in the middle, and optional layers above it for sourcing, assessments, video interviews, and AI screening. A small business buys the middle and gets the front bundled with it.
The layers above the tracker only earn their cost at volume. Sourcing tools matter when nobody applies to your postings, and skills assessments matter when one role produces more applications than anyone can read properly. At three hires a year, neither does.
The same logic covers AI screening and a recruitment CRM for nurturing people over months: real capabilities that assume somebody owns recruiting as a job. Where hiring is the fifth item on a founder's list, the working stack is a careers page, one tracker, and a decision about who sends the paperwork.
Six pricing models for one product category
Recruiting software vendors charge in six different ways, and the model you end up on decides your bill more than any feature comparison. They are not competing on price so much as on what they meter, and each meter suits a different kind of company. This is the part every listicle in this category skips.
| Pricing model | Who uses it | When it works for you | Where it turns against you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flat fee per tier | JazzHR, Breezy HR | Cost does not move when you hire or add users | Job-count caps replace the meter; JazzHR Hero starts at 3 job postings a month |
| Per user | Manatal, Zoho Recruit | Cheap with two or three people in the system | Every recruiter seat is a line item, and Zoho Recruit sells hiring manager licenses on top |
| Per employee | Workable, BambooHR | Predictable if headcount is stable | You pay more for hiring software as you hire, even in a quiet year |
| Per location | CareerPlug | Scales with sites rather than people | Sensible for franchise and multi-site, odd for a single office |
| Modular add-on | Rippling | One vendor for HR, IT, and payroll | Recruiting cannot be bought on its own; you buy the platform first |
| Quote only | Greenhouse, Lever | Negotiable at scale | You cannot compare it against anything until you sit through a call |
10 recruiting software products at a glance
The table covers pricing model, the lowest paid tier, free tiers, and the cap that most often forces an upgrade. The last column is the one to read twice: on half these products the constraint is not price but a hard limit written into the entry plan.
| Product | Pricing model | Entry price | Free tier | Unlimited users | Published price | Main cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JazzHR | Flat per tier | $1,000/yr | 3 job postings/mo | |||
| Breezy HR | Flat per tier | $157/mo | 1 job on free | |||
| Manatal | Per user | $15/user/mo | 15 jobs | |||
| Zoho Recruit | Per user | $25/user/mo | 1 job on free | |||
| Workable | Headcount band | $299/mo | 20-employee band | |||
| BambooHR | Per employee | $250/mo | 5 jobs on Core | |||
| Rippling | Modular per employee | Quote | No standalone ATS | |||
| CareerPlug | Per location | Quote | Per location | |||
| Lever | Quote only | Quote | Not published | Not published | ||
| Greenhouse | Quote only | Quote | Not published | Not published |
How we evaluated these products
We evaluated for a US small business making roughly 3 to 20 hires a year, where hiring is run by a founder, office manager, or operations lead rather than a recruiter. Four tests, applied identically to all ten.
Published pricing, built for small teams
These five publish rates you can act on without a call. For most small businesses, the right answer is on this list.
JazzHR charges a flat fee per tier regardless of company headcount and includes unlimited users on every plan, which is the strongest pricing argument in this comparison for a small business. Adding a reviewer costs nothing extra, and the bill does not move when you grow from 12 people to 30. JazzHR announced in January 2022 that 10,000 small and mid-sized businesses use it to hire, and it rates 4.3 on Capterra across nearly 500 reviews.
The constraint is the job allowance rather than the price. Hero's allowance starts at three job postings a month, and JazzHR publishes no price for more, so a team posting four or five roles in a month either pays for extra postings or jumps to Plus at $3,480 a year, three and a half times the Hero price.
Two JazzHR features skip Hero entirely, cost extra on Plus, and come included only on Pro: offer letters with e-signature and advanced visual reporting. JazzHR is also an applicant tracking system rather than a sourcing tool: it tracks and searches the candidates who come to you, and outbound search runs through its LinkedIn Recruiter integration.
At $15 per user per month, Manatal produces the lowest total bill on this page for a company where hiring sits with one or two people. A single-seat account is $180 a year, less than Workable or BambooHR charge for a single month, and the Professional tier still includes 15 jobs, 10,000 candidates, AI candidate scoring, and integration with a large number of job boards.
The model inverts as the recruiting team grows. Every plan includes unlimited hiring manager accounts, but every recruiter who works the pipeline is another $15 a month, so a company where six people recruit pays $1,080 a year against JazzHR's flat $1,000 at Hero with no per-seat charge.
Manatal has no free tier, only a 14-day trial. API access, which lets you connect it to your other software, starts at Enterprise Plus at $55 per user a month. The product is also lighter than the incumbents on structured interviewing, compliance reporting, and complex approval workflows, which matters more to a mid-size company than to a small one.
The Bootstrap free plan is the most complete zero-cost option in this comparison. It includes one active job with unlimited users, unlimited candidates, a branded careers page, and distribution to more than 50 job boards, which is a working hiring process rather than a demo. For a company filling one role at a time, that is genuinely the whole product.
Paid tiers are priced above the market. Startup at $157 a month is nearly double JazzHR's Hero, and the features many teams want next, including e-signatures, scorecards, and interview guides, sit on Growth at $273.
The single-active-job limit on the free plan is strict rather than soft: a second open role means paying, which is the moment most companies discover the pricing gap. If you hire one role at a time and expect that to continue, Breezy is excellent value; if you expect two or three concurrent openings, compare it against the flat-fee and per-seat options first.
Zoho Recruit rates 4.5 on Capterra across more than 1,200 reviews. Its real advantage is contextual: if your company already runs Zoho CRM, Books, or People, recruiting data lands in a system your team already knows, which removes a category of friction that no feature list captures.
Two things to know before assuming the free tier solves your problem. It allows one active job and omits resume parsing and sourcing, so it is functional for a solo recruiter filling one position and not much beyond.
Zoho Recruit also ships as two separate editions, Corporate HR and Staffing Agency, with different plan structures and job limits at the same price point, which catches buyers who compare the wrong one. Outside the Zoho ecosystem the case is decent rather than compelling.
Workable bundles more sourcing into the base product than anything else at this price level: every plan includes a candidate sourcing suite with more than 400 million passive profiles, while one-way video interviews and skills assessments are add-ons on Standard and included from Premier.
Workable's distribution reaches more than 200 job boards, and its interface is the most polished in this group. For a company that would otherwise buy an ATS plus a separate assessment tool, the consolidated bill can be competitive.
For a small business, the pricing model is the problem. Workable scales by total employee headcount rather than by recruiter seats, which means a company of 40 people making two hires a year pays more than a company of 12 making ten.
Workable's published rate is a band: $299 a month covers 1 to 20 employees, and the price steps up with each band above that. On Standard, texting, video interviews, and assessments add $89, $109, and $59 a month, respectively.
Recruiting inside a broader HR platform
These two sell recruiting as part of something larger, a human resources information system (HRIS) that manages employees once they are hired. The question is not whether the recruiting module is good but whether you want the platform it comes attached to.
BambooHR is a well-regarded core HR system, and its applicant tracking module has the advantage that a hired candidate becomes an employee record without a handoff. For a company that needs an HRIS anyway, running recruiting in it removes an integration and a second vendor relationship, which is worth real money in administrative time.
Two caveats for this audience. The flat $250 a month on Core applies to any company with 25 or fewer employees, so a 12-person company pays the same as a 25-person one. And recruiting is not the product: Core caps applicant tracking at five open jobs, and sourcing and AI capability are limited compared with the specialists. If recruiting is your primary problem, you are buying a lot of HRIS to solve it.
Rippling is the deepest consolidation play in this comparison: hire someone in the recruiting module and the platform can provision their payroll, benefits, laptop, and application accounts from the same action. For a technology company that would otherwise coordinate four systems on every start date, that removes genuine operational overhead.
The structural point for this page is that recruiting cannot be bought on its own. Rippling sells each product alongside its required core platform, so evaluating the recruiting module means evaluating the whole stack. Recruiting has no published price: the pricing page is a quote request form, and the starting price Rippling publishes, on its small-business page, is a payroll start of $8 per user per month plus a $40 monthly base fee. If you want the platform, the recruiting module is a reasonable addition. If you want recruiting software, this is the wrong entry point.
Quote-only platforms
These three publish nothing. Two of them are built for a stage most readers of this page have not reached; one focuses on small businesses but still makes you ask.
CareerPlug is the only product here designed around the multi-location problem, where hiring happens at each site and the owner needs visibility across all of them without giving every store manager access to every pipeline. CareerPlug says it helps more than 60,000 businesses, including more than 400 franchise brands, and its per-location billing matches how franchise and multi-site groups actually think about cost.
For a single-office company the model is simply the wrong shape. CareerPlug publishes no rate for any plan, so a single-site business cannot even check what one location costs without a call. If you run one location, start with the published-price options above.
Lever combines applicant tracking with candidate relationship management, which is the right architecture once you are building a talent pipeline over time rather than filling roles reactively. It is a capable platform that pitches itself to teams of all sizes, which is why it turns up in comparisons like this one.
The gap between that pitch and the product is worth naming. Nothing is published, every plan includes the CRM whether or not you use it, and Lever's own parent company, Employ, positions it for scalable hiring while selling JazzHR for foundational hiring.
The features that justify Lever's price, nurture campaigns and long-horizon pipeline building, assume someone owns recruiting as a job. If nobody at your company does, you are paying for capability that will sit unused.
Greenhouse is the strongest product in this comparison on hiring rigor: structured interview kits, scorecards, approval workflows, and reporting depth. Companies that outgrow a simple pipeline tool frequently land here, and for good reason.
According to the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, interviews with more structure predict job performance better, produce more consistent ratings and closer agreement between interviewers, and show less adverse impact, meaning selection rates are less likely to work against members of a race, sex, or ethnic group.
Still, Greenhouse is on this page so you can recognize it and stop evaluating it. It publishes no figure for any plan and says cost tracks hiring volume and organizational complexity, which tells you the price is built for companies with plenty of both.
The rigor that justifies the price also requires process discipline that a founder hiring four people a year will not maintain. That is a fit problem, not a quality one.
What it actually costs at 15 employees
At published rates, the same 15-employee company can pay several times more on one product than on another. The model below is that business, with four roles open at once and three people needing pipeline access, on annual billing. Every listicle in this category lists starting prices; almost none of them does this.
| Product | How the bill is built | Annual cost | What the number hides |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manatal Professional | 3 users at $15 each | $540 | Caps at 15 jobs and 10,000 candidates; no free tier |
| Zoho Recruit Standard | 3 recruiter licenses at $25 each | $900 | Free tier exists but allows only 1 active job |
| JazzHR Hero | $1,000 a year flat | $1,000+ | Postings start at 3 a month and JazzHR lists no price for more; no per-user price |
| Breezy HR Startup | $157 a month flat | $1,884 | Free Bootstrap tier allows 1 active job, so not viable at four |
| BambooHR Core | Flat $250 a month at 25 employees or fewer | $3,000 | Applicant tracking capped at 5 job openings; payroll and benefits cost extra |
| JazzHR Plus | $3,480 a year flat | $3,480 | Up to 200 active jobs; the tier a team outgrowing Hero lands on |
| Workable Standard | 1-20 employee band at $299 a month | $3,588 | Texting, video interviews, and assessments cost $59 to $109 a month each |
| Rippling | Platform plus per-employee modules | Not published | Recruiting is quoted and cannot be bought standalone; the published $8 per user plus $40 monthly start is for payroll |
| Lever | Quote only | Not published | Pricing tailored to company size and hiring needs |
| Greenhouse | Quote only | Not published | Cost depends on plan, hiring volume, and complexity |
Two things fall out of the table. First, the range is roughly seven to one across the products that publish a price, and almost all of it comes from the metering rather than from capability.
Second, the ordering is not the ordering you would get from starting prices. Breezy HR looks cheaper than JazzHR at a glance because it has a free tier and JazzHR does not, yet four open roles push you onto its first paid plan, which costs nearly double JazzHR Hero. Model your own numbers before trusting any list, including this one.
The verdict by hiring pattern
A single ranking assumes every small business is the same company. It is not, and the right answer changes three times between the first hire and steady hiring across the team.
| Your situation | What usually fits | What to avoid |
|---|---|---|
| One to three hires a year | A free tier, or nothing yet; Breezy HR Bootstrap or Zoho Recruit free | Any annual subscription; the cost per hire is indefensible |
| One role open at a time, reliably | Manatal at one or two seats, or Breezy HR free while it holds | Per-employee pricing, which charges you for growth not hiring |
| Several roles open at once | JazzHR Hero plus extra postings, or Manatal Professional | Job-capped free tiers; you will hit the wall in week two |
| Hiring steadily, with managers involved | JazzHR Plus or Breezy HR Growth; flat fees with no per-seat charge | Per-seat pricing once six or more people need paid seats |
| Multi-location or franchise | CareerPlug, despite the quote process | Single-pipeline tools that cannot separate sites |
| You need an HRIS anyway | BambooHR or Rippling, accepting a weaker ATS | Buying both separately and maintaining the integration yourself |
The honest summary is that most companies hiring occasionally are better served by a free tier or the cheapest published-price option than by anything pricier on this page. And a product that pitches itself to teams of every size can still be priced for a stage beyond yours.
Recruitment software for startups
Startups differ from other small businesses on one variable: hiring arrives in bursts. Six quiet months, then six roles open the week a round closes. That pattern punishes per-employee pricing, which bills you through the quiet stretch, and rewards flat fees and free tiers you can sit on between bursts.
Two consequences follow. Be careful signing an annual commitment during a burst, because the burst ends and the contract does not. And check the price of one extra active job rather than the price of the plan, since on a job-capped tier that is the number that moves.
Startup hiring also leans on referrals and the careers page more than on job board volume, so check where referral tools sit: on Breezy HR the referral portal starts at Growth, and on Workable referrals start at Premier.
Before you choose
Applicant tracking is coming soon to FirstHR; until it launches, job postings, an applicant pipeline, and candidate sourcing come from one of the products above. What it covers today starts once someone accepts: an HR platform for US small businesses that runs onboarding and holds employee records, at a flat $98 a month for up to 10 people or $198 for 11 to 50.
The platform's built-in e-signature and document management keep the signed offer, the forms, and the policy acknowledgments with that record. That matters here because onboarding is where these products differ most: BambooHR and Rippling carry a hire into an employee record, while most of the trackers stop at the offer or sell onboarding as an add-on, a higher tier, or a separate product.
According to Gallup, about a third of new employees do not last 90 days on the job, so the weeks after an accepted offer determine whether a hire sticks. Decide which tool owns that transition before your next hire rather than during it.
How to choose recruiting software
Five questions settle this, and the first two remove most of the field before you open a trial.
Before you sign anything annual, run one live role through a free tier. Both Breezy HR and Zoho Recruit allow one active job at no cost, which is enough to learn whether your team will actually use a pipeline tool. That question predicts the outcome of the purchase better than any feature comparison, and adoption is where most of these subscriptions quietly fail.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does recruiting software cost for a small business?
For a small business, anywhere from nothing on a free tier to about $3,600 a year at published rates. At 15 employees with four open roles, Manatal comes to about $540, Zoho Recruit $900, JazzHR Hero $1,000 before extra postings, Breezy HR Startup $1,884, and Workable Standard $3,588. Greenhouse, Lever, CareerPlug, and Rippling publish no recruiting price. The spread is pricing model, not capability.
What is the best recruiting software for a small business?
It depends on your hiring pattern. Steady hiring with several people involved favors JazzHR at $1,000 a year flat with no per-user price. One or two people running everything favors Manatal at $15 per seat. Occasional hiring favors a free tier. If you need an HRIS anyway, BambooHR or Rippling bundle recruiting in. Match the pricing model to how you actually hire before comparing features.
Is there free recruiting software for small business?
Yes. Breezy HR Bootstrap is free with one active job, unlimited users and candidates, a branded careers site, and 50-plus job board distribution. Zoho Recruit has a Forever Free plan also capped at one active job. Both stop working with two concurrent openings, which is what pushes companies to paid plans. The big job boards let you post at no cost, but a job board is not an applicant tracking system.
What is an applicant tracking system?
Software that manages the hiring pipeline: publishing jobs to boards, collecting applications in one place, moving candidates through stages, storing resumes and feedback, coordinating interviews, and reporting on source and time to hire. Recruiting software and hiring software are synonyms for it. The distinction that matters more than the label is whether a product also sources candidates who have not applied.
Do I need recruiting software if I only hire a few people a year?
Probably not a paid subscription. At two or three hires a year, an $1,800 plan works out to $600 to $900 per hire before job board spend. The threshold is applicant volume rather than hire count: when one posting produces more applications than you can review by inbox, a pipeline tool pays for itself. A free tier is the sensible middle step.
What is the difference between recruiting software and an HRIS?
Recruiting software manages candidates before hire; an HRIS manages employees after. They meet at exactly one point, when someone accepts and has to become an employee record. Some vendors sell both, but bundling usually means a weaker version of one side. Buying separately gives better tools and one handoff to manage, which for most small companies is the easier trade.
Why do some recruiting software vendors hide their pricing?
Because pricing depends on variables they prefer to discuss, such as plan, company size, hiring volume, and modules. Greenhouse, Lever, CareerPlug, and Rippling all quote their recruiting software, and Rippling's published starting price is for payroll. The consequence is that you cannot compare them against a published-price competitor without spending calls first, and nobody outside the deal sees the rate card.
Should recruiting software integrate with onboarding?
It should at least hand off cleanly. Gallup finds that only 12% of employees strongly agree their organization does a great job onboarding new employees, so a weak handoff is common. Many affordable recruiting tools end at the offer or charge extra for onboarding. Decide in advance which tool owns the transition and when the paperwork goes out, rather than discovering the gap with your first hire.
Make HR the easy part of running your business
Onboarding, e-signatures, training and core HR in one place. Up and running in 5 minutes.
- 7-day free trial
- No credit card required
- Cancel anytime